The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks Accurately Classify Genetic Mutations in Gliomas
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The World Health Organization has recently placed new emphasis on the integration of genetic information for gliomas. While tissue sampling remains the criterion standard, noninvasive imaging techniques may provide complimentary insight into clinically relevant genetic mutations. Our aim was to train a convolutional neural network to independently predict underlying molecular genetic mutation status in gliomas with high accuracy and identify the most predictive imaging features for each mutation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging data and molecular information were retrospectively obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archives for 259 patients with either low- or high-grade gliomas. A convolutional neural network was trained to classify isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation status, 1p/19q codeletion, and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation status. Principal component analysis of the final convolutional neural network layer was used to extract the key imaging features critical for successful classification. RESULTS: Classification had high accuracy: IDH1 mutation status, 94%; 1p/19q codeletion, 92%; and MGMT promotor methylation status, 83%. Each genetic category was also associated with distinctive imaging features such as definition of tumor margins, T1 and FLAIR suppression, extent of edema, extent of necrosis, and textural features. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that for The Cancer Imaging Archives dataset, machine-learning approaches allow classification of individual genetic mutations of both low- and high-grade gliomas. We show that relevant MR imaging features acquired from an added dimensionality-reduction technique demonstrate that neural networks are capable of learning key imaging components without prior feature selection or human-directed training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · Cited by 11,888
IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations in Gliomas
Yan, H., Parsons, D. W., Jin, G., McLendon, R., Rasheed, B. A., Yuan, W., Kos, I., Batinic-Haberle, I., Jones, S., Riggins, G. J., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0808710 · Cited by 5,847
Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034 · Cited by 5,370
The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
Clark, K., Vendt, B., Smith, K., Freymann, J., Kirby, J., Koppel, P., Moore, S., Phillips, S., Maffitt, D., Pringle, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 · Cited by 4,599
Lakhani, P., & Sundaram, B. (2017) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162326 · Cited by 1,775
Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Litjens, G., Gerke, P., Jacobs, C., van Riel, S. J., Wille, M. M. W., Naqibullah, M., Sanchez, C. I., & van Ginneken, B. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2536809 · Cited by 1,258
Cited by
Kather, J. N., Pearson, A. T., Halama, N., Jäger, D., Krause, J., Loosen, S. H., Marx, A., Boor, P., Tacke, F., Neumann, U. P., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0462-y · Cited by 1,458
A deep learning model to predict RNA-Seq expression of tumours from whole-slide images
Schmauch, B., Romagnoni, A., Pronier, E., Saillard, C., Maillé, P., Calderaro, J., Kamoun, A., Sefta, M., Toldo, S., Zaslavskiy, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17678-4 · Cited by 533
Machine Learning Methods in Drug Discovery
Patel, L., Shukla, T., Huang, X., Ussery, D. W., & Wang, S. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25225277 · Cited by 460
Su, J.-R., Li, Z., Shao, X.-J., Ji, C.-R., Ji, R., Zhou, R.-C., Li, G.-C., Liu, G.-Q., He, Y.-S., Zuo, X.-L., et al. (2020) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.026 · Cited by 286
The Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice
Karalis, V. D. (2024) · Applied Biosciences · doi:10.3390/applbiosci3010002 · Cited by 255
Deep learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: current applications and future directions
Yasaka, K., & Abe, O. (2018) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002707 · Cited by 238
Hoang, D.-T., Dinstag, G., Shulman, E. D., Hermida, L. C., Ben-Zvi, D. S., Elis, E., Caley, K., Sammut, S.-J., Sinha, S., Sinha, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-024-00793-2 · Cited by 157
Technical and clinical overview of deep learning in radiology
Ueda, D., Shimazaki, A., & Miki, Y. (2019) · Japanese Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1007/s11604-018-0795-3 · Cited by 100
ContIG: Self-supervised Multimodal Contrastive Learning for Medical Imaging with Genetics
Taleb, A., Kirchler, M., Monti, R., & Lippert, C. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.02024 · Cited by 83
Artificial intelligence in glioma imaging: Challenges and advances
Jin, W., Fatehi, M., Abhishek, K., Mallya, M., Toyota, B., & Hamarneh, G. (2020) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab8131 · Cited by 55
Extendable and explainable deep learning for pan-cancer radiogenomics research
Liu, Q., & Hu, P. (2022) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.102111 · Cited by 27
Wang, Y., Tu, D., Du, J., Han, X., Sun, Y., Xu, Q., Zhai, G., & Zhou, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00627 · Cited by 25
“With the rapid progress of this field, convolutional neural network (CNN) has been utilized in many medical fields, such as in the classification of Alzheimer’s brains and healthy brains and the prediction of underlying molecular genetic mutation status in gliomas (Sarraf and Tofighi, 2016; Chang et al., 2018), which…”
MethodBeyond Medical Imaging - A Review of Multimodal Deep Learning in Radiology
Heiliger, L., Sekuboyina, A., Menze, B., Egger, J., & Kleesiek, J. (2022) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.19103432 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, P., Grinband, J., Weinberg, B. D., Bardis, M., Khy, M., Cadena, G., Su, M.-Y., Cha, S., Filippi, C. G., Bota, D., Baldi, P., Poisson, L. M., Jain, R., & Chow, D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Neuroradiology
- Published
- 2018-05-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1201-1207
- ISSN
- 0195-6108 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-959X
- OpenAlex
- W2802159733
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 31.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
