Cited by 533AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

A deep learning model to predict RNA-Seq expression of tumours from whole-slide images

Open access
Schmauch, Benoît, Romagnoni, Alberto, Pronier, Elodie, Saillard, Charlie, Maillé, Pascale, Calderaro, Julien, Kamoun, Aurélie, Sefta, Meriem +6 more·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Deep learning methods for digital pathology analysis are an effective way to address multiple clinical questions, from diagnosis to prediction of treatment outcomes. These methods have also been used to predict gene mutations from pathology images, but no comprehensive evaluation of their potential for extracting molecular features from histology slides has yet been performed. We show that HE2RNA, a model based on the integration of multiple data modes, can be trained to systematically predict RNA-Seq profiles from whole-slide images alone, without expert annotation. Through its interpretable design, HE2RNA provides virtual spatialization of gene expression, as validated by CD3- and CD20-staining on an independent dataset. The transcriptomic representation learned by HE2RNA can also be transferred on other datasets, even of small size, to increase prediction performance for specific molecular phenotypes. We illustrate the use of this approach in clinical diagnosis purposes such as the identification of tumors with microsatellite instability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-17678-4

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A representative line of work predicts gene expression directly from whole-slide histology by modeling higher-order tissue relationships using hypergraph neural networks, enabling gene-level inference from cost-effective imaging while capturing structured dependencies among multi-scale morphological features.

    “A representative line of work predicts gene expression directly from whole-slide histology by modeling higher-order tissue relationships using hypergraph neural networks, enabling gene-level inference from cost-effective imaging while capturing structured dependencies among multi-scale morphological features (13).”

    From The role of multimodality in clinical disease diagnosis: advances, challenges, and opportunities (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]Noorbakhsh, J. et al. Pan-cancer classifications of tumor histological images using deep learning. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/715656v1.full (2020). · DOI
  2. [13]Xu, H., Park, S., Lee, S. H. & Hwang, T. H. Using transfer learning on whole slide images to predict tumor mutational burden in bladder cancer patients. Bioinformatics, 10.1101/554527 (2019). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmauch, B., Romagnoni, A., Pronier, E., Saillard, C., Maillé, P., Calderaro, J., Kamoun, A., Sefta, M., Toldo, S., Zaslavskiy, M., Clozel, T., Moarii, M., Courtiol, P., & Wainrib, G.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Schmauch, Benoît
  • Wainrib, Gilles
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-08-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
3877-3877
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046305306
Cited by
533
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 6
FWCI
23.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
whole slide images, digital pathology, multimodal data integration, spatial gene expression, explainable deep learning, transfer learning, microsatellite instability, cancer diagnosis, histology
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, RNA-Seq, Algorithms, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Genetic, Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Microsatellite Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review