Cited by 27Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Extendable and explainable deep learning for pan-cancer radiogenomics research

Liu, Qian, Hu, Pingzhao·2022·Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Abstract

Radiogenomics is a field where medical images and genomic profiles are jointly analyzed to answer critical clinical questions. Specifically, people want to identify non-invasive imaging biomarkers that are associated with both genomic features and clinical outcomes. Deep learning is an advanced computer science technique that has been applied in many fields, including medical image and genomic data analysis. This review summarizes the current state of deep learning in pan-cancer radiogenomic research, discusses its limitations, and indicates the potential future directions. Traditional machine learning in radiomics, genomics, and radiogenomics have also been briefly discussed. We also summarize the main pan-cancer radiogenomic research resources. Two characteristics of deep learning are emphasized when discussing its application to pan-cancer radiogenomics, which are extendibility and explainability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.102111

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integration of radiomics and genomics has extended clinical applications of CT/MRI images, allowing prediction of molecular mutation status from images.

    “The integration of radiomics and genomics has extended the clinical applications of these images, allowing for the prediction of molecular mutation status from images [101]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 174 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Q., & Hu, P.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Hu, Pingzhao
Venue
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
66
Pages
102111
ISSN
1367-5931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205914284
Cited by
27
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Manitoba Medical Service Foundation
  • CancerCare Manitoba Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
radiogenomics, pan-cancer, deep learning, explainable AI, extensibility, imaging biomarkers, radiomics, genomic profiles, medical image analysis, clinical outcomes
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Neoplasms, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review