Cited by 597Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dopamine reward prediction error coding

Open access
Schultz, Wolfram·2016·Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Reward prediction errors consist of the differences between received and predicted rewards. They are crucial for basic forms of learning about rewards and make us strive for more rewards-an evolutionary beneficial trait. Most dopamine neurons in the midbrain of humans, monkeys, and rodents signal a reward prediction error; they are activated by more reward than predicted (positive prediction error), remain at baseline activity for fully predicted rewards, and show depressed activity with less reward than predicted (negative prediction error). The dopamine signal increases nonlinearly with reward value and codes formal economic utility. Drugs of addiction generate, hijack, and amplify the dopamine reward signal and induce exaggerated, uncontrolled dopamine effects on neuronal plasticity. The striatum, amygdala, and frontal cortex also show reward prediction error coding, but only in subpopulations of neurons. Thus, the important concept of reward prediction errors is implemented in neuronal hardware.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31887/dcns.2016.18.1/wschultz

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Pavlov PI., 1927, Conditioned Reflexes. London, UK: Oxford University Press:
  2. Rescorla RA., 1972, Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory. New York, NY: Appleton Century Crofts:, 64
  3. von Neumann J., 1944, The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press:

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 595

Metadata

Authors
Schultz, W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Schultz, Wolfram
Venue
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2016-03-31
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
23-32
ISSN
  • 1294-8322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1958-5969
OpenAlex
W2419438565
Cited by
597
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 4
FWCI
24.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (093875)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
dopamine, reward prediction error, midbrain dopaminergic neurons, reward learning, drug addiction, neuroplasticity, striatum, amygdala, frontal cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Dopamine, Forecasting, Humans, Learning, Nerve Net, Neuronal Plasticity, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review