Cited by 54Cognitive Abilities and TestingDigital Games and MediaNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Effects of computer gaming on cognition, brain structure, and function: a critical reflection on existing literature

Open access
Kühn, Simone, Gallinat, Jürgen, Mascherek, Anna·2019·Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Video gaming as a popular form of leisure activity and its effect on cognition, brain function, and structure has come into focus in the field of neuroscience. Visuospatial cognition and attention seem to benefit the most, whereas for executive functions, memory, and general cognition, the results are contradictory. The particular characteristics of video games driving these effects remain poorly understood. We critically discuss major challenges for the existing research, namely, the lack of precise definitions of video gaming, the lack of distinct choice of cognitive ability under study, and the lack of standardized study protocols. Less research exists on neural changes in addition to cognitive changes due to video gaming. Existing studies reveal evidence for the involvement of similar brain regions in functional and structural changes. There seems to be a predominance in the hippocampal, prefrontal, and parietal brain regions; however, studies differ immensely, which makes a meta-analytic interpretation vulnerable. We conclude that theoretical work is urgently needed. .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31887/dcns.2019.21.3/skuehn

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kühn, S., Gallinat, J., & Mascherek, A.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Kühn, Simone
Venue
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
319-330
ISSN
  • 1294-8322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1958-5969
OpenAlex
W2989619420
Cited by
54
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Jacobs Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
video gaming, computer gaming, cognition, brain structure, brain function, visuospatial cognition, attention, executive function, memory, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Neuronal Plasticity, Video Games, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review