Cited by 42Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsElectronic Health Records Systems

Are Clinicians Correct When They Believe They Are Correct? Implications for Medical Decision Support

Friedman Charles, Gatti Guido, Elstein Arthur, Franz Timothy, Murphy Gwendolyn, Wolf Fredric·2001·Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Abstract

The process of clinical decision support is linked to the validity of clinicians’ confidence in their judgments. Clinicians who are appropriately confident—highly confident when they are correct and less confident when they are incorrect—will access computer-based and other information resources only when they are needed. Clinicians who are consistently underconfident will rely on external resources when they are not needed. Those who are overconfident, who believe they are correct when in fact they are not, will be prone to medical errors. An extensive literature indicates a general tendency toward overconfidence in human judgment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-454

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Underconfident clinicians are likely to seek external information to validate and ensure their diagnostic accuracy, resulting in over testing and delays in decision making.

    “underconfident clinicians are likely to seek external information to validate and ensure their diagnostic accuracy [106,107], resulting in over testing and delays in decision making [108].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charles, F., Guido, G., Arthur, E., Timothy, F., Gwendolyn, M., & Fredric, W.
Venue
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Publisher
IOS Press
Published
2001
Volume
84
Issue
Pt 1
Pages
454-8
ISSN
0926-9630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2255803544
Cited by
41
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.59
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies in health technology and informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01lm005630-06)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01-LM-05630)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
clinical decision support, overconfidence, confidence judgments, diagnostic accuracy, underconfidence, medical errors, differential diagnosis, internal medicine diagnosis, clinical experience, medical students, medical residents, information needs, medical informatics research
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Diagnosis, Internship and Residency, Judgment, Medical Staff, Hospital, Students, Medical, Clinical Medicine, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review