Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: An Overview of Self-Report Measures Used Across 19 International Research Studies

Open access
Rabin, Laura A., the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Smart, Colette M., Crane, Paul K., Amariglio, Rebecca E., Berman, Lorin M., Boada, Mercé, Buckley, Rachel F., Chételat, Gaël, Dubois, Bruno, Ellis, Kathryn A., Gifford, Katherine A., Jefferson, Angela L., Jessen, Frank, Katz, Mindy J., Lipton, Richard B., Luck, Tobias, Maruff, Paul, Mielke, Michelle M., Molinuevo, José Luis, Naeem, Farnia, Perrotin, Audrey, Petersen, Ronald C., Rami, Lorena, Reisberg, Barry, Rentz, Dorene M., Riedel-Heller, Steffi G., Risacher, Shannon L., Rodriguez, Octavio, Sachdev, Perminder S., Saykin, Andrew J., Slavin, Melissa J., Snitz, Beth E., Sperling, Reisa A., Tandetnik, Caroline, van der Flier, Wiesje M., Wagner, Michael, Wolfsgruber, Steffen, Sikkes, Sietske A.M.·2015·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Research increasingly suggests that subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in older adults, in the absence of objective cognitive dysfunction or depression, may be a harbinger of non-normative cognitive decline and eventual progression to dementia. Little is known, however, about the key features of self-report measures currently used to assess SCD. The Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I) Working Group is an international consortium established to develop a conceptual framework and research criteria for SCD (Jessen et al., 2014, Alzheimers Dement 10, 844-852). In the current study we systematically compared cognitive self-report items used by 19 SCD-I Working Group studies, representing 8 countries and 5 languages. We identified 34 self-report measures comprising 640 cognitive self-report items. There was little overlap among measures- approximately 75% of measures were used by only one study. Wide variation existed in response options and item content. Items pertaining to the memory domain predominated, accounting for about 60% of items surveyed, followed by executive function and attention, with 16% and 11% of the items, respectively. Items relating to memory for the names of people and the placement of common objects were represented on the greatest percentage of measures (56% each). Working group members reported that instrument selection decisions were often based on practical considerations beyond the study of SCD specifically, such as availability and brevity of measures. Results document the heterogeneity of approaches across studies to the emerging construct of SCD. We offer preliminary recommendations for instrument selection and future research directions including identifying items and measure formats associated with important clinical outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-150154

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Rabin, L. A., Initiative, T. A. D. N., Smart, C. M., Crane, P. K., Amariglio, R. E., Berman, L. M., Boada, M., Buckley, R. F., Chételat, G., Dubois, B., Ellis, K. A., Gifford, K. A., Jefferson, A. L., Jessen, F., Katz, M. J., Lipton, R. B., Luck, T., Maruff, P., Mielke, M. M., Molinuevo, J. L., Naeem, F., Perrotin, A., Petersen, R. C., Rami, L., Reisberg, B., Rentz, D. M., Riedel-Heller, S. G., Risacher, S. L., Rodriguez, O., Sachdev, P. S., Saykin, A. J., Slavin, M. J., Snitz, B. E., Sperling, R. A., Tandetnik, C., van der Flier, W. M., Wagner, M., Wolfsgruber, S., & Sikkes, S. A. M.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2015-09-24
Volume
48
Issue
s1
Pages
S63-S86
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2210563386
Cited by
462
References
23
FWCI
20.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: An Overview of Self-Report Measures Used Across 19 International Research Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/jad-150154
The paper
Rabin, L. A., Initiative, T. A. D. N., Smart, C. M., Crane, P. K., Amariglio, R. E., Berman, L. M., Boada, M., Buckley, R. F., Chételat, G., Dubois, B., Ellis, K. A., Gifford, K. A., Jefferson, A. L., Jessen, F., Katz, M. J., Lipton, R. B., Luck, T., Maruff, P., Mielke, M. M., . . . Sikkes, S. A. M. (2015). Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: An Overview of Self-Report Measures Used Across 19 International Research Studies. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-150154

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.