Cited by 136Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAutophagy in Disease and TherapyNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Impaired Autophagy in APOE4 Astrocytes

Simonovitch, Shira, Schmukler, Eran, Bespalko, Alina, Iram, Tal, Frenkel, Dan, Holtzman, David M., Masliah, Eliezer, Michaelson, Danny M. +1 more·2016·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent form of dementia in elderly. Genetic studies revealed allelic segregation of the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) gene in sporadic AD and in families with higher risk of AD. The mechanisms underlying the pathological effects of ApoE4 are not yet entirely clear. Several studies indicate that autophagy, which plays an important role in degradation pathways of proteins, organelles and protein aggregates, may be impaired in AD. In the present study, we investigated the effects of ApoE4 versus the ApoE3 isoform on the process of autophagy in mouse-derived astrocytes. The results obtained reveal that under several autophagy-inducing conditions, astrocytes expressing ApoE4 exhibit lower autophagic flux compared to astrocytes expressing ApoE3. Using an in situ model, we examined the role of autophagy and the effects thereon of ApoE4 in the elimination of Aβ plaques from isolated brain sections of transgenic 5xFAD mice. This revealed that ApoE4 astrocytes eliminate Aβ plaques less effectively than the corresponding ApoE3 astrocytes. Additional experiments showed that the autophagy inducer, rapamycin, enhances Aβ plaque degradation by ApoE4 astrocytes whereas the autophagy inhibitor, chloroquine, blocks Aβ plaque degradation by ApoE3 astrocytes. Taken together, these findings show that ApoE4 impairs autophagy in astrocyte cultures and that this effect is associated with reduced capacity to clear Aβ plaques. This suggests that impaired autophagy may…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-151101

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simonovitch, S., Schmukler, E., Bespalko, A., Iram, T., Frenkel, D., Holtzman, D. M., Masliah, E., Michaelson, D. M., & Pinkas-Kramarski, R.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Department of Neurobiology, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel
Corresponding author
Michaelson, Danny M.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2016-03-30
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
915-927
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2291070922
Cited by
136
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε4
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Autophagy, Brain, Cells, Cultured, Central Nervous System Agents, Chloroquine, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Time Factors, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Sirolimus, Apolipoprotein E3, Apolipoprotein E4, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review