Cited by 105Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

A Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM)-Based Method for Absolute Quantification of Aβ 38 , Aβ 40 , and Aβ 42 in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Alzheimer's Disease Patients and Healthy Controls

Open access
Pannee, Josef, Portelius, Erik, Oppermann, Madalina, Atkins, Alan, Hornshaw, Martin, Zegers, Ingrid, Höjrup, Peter, Minthon, Lennart +4 more·2013·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are increasingly used in research centers, clinical trials, and clinical settings. However, their broad-scale use is hampered by lack of standardization across analytical platforms and by interference from binding of amyloid-β (Aβ) to matrix proteins as well as self-aggregation. Here, we report on a matrix effect-resistant method for the measurement of the AD-associated 42 amino acid species of Aβ (Aβ 42 ), together with Aβ 40 and Aβ 38 in human CSF based on mass spectrometric quantification using selected reaction monitoring (SRM). Samples were prepared by solid-phase extraction and quantification was performed using stable-isotope labeled Aβ peptides as internal standards. The diagnostic performance of the method was evaluated on two independent clinical materials with research volunteers who were cognitively normal and AD patients with mild to moderate dementia. Analytical characteristics of the method include a lower limit of quantification of 62.5 pg/mL for Aβ 42 and coefficients of variations below 10%. In a pilot study on AD patients and controls, we verified disease-association with decreased levels of Aβ 42 similar to that obtained by ELISA and even better separation was obtained using the Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 ratio. The developed assay is sensitive and is not influenced by matrix effects, enabling absolute quantification of Aβ 42 , Aβ 40 , and Aβ 38 in CSF, while it retains the ability to distinguish AD patients from controls. We suggest this SRM-based method for Aβ peptide quantification in human CSF valuable for clinical research and trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-2012-121471

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have successfully used targeted MS strategies to quantify Aβ, tau, and APOE protein levels in CSF with similar disease-association efficacy to that of traditional ELISA assays.

    “Several studies have successfully used targeted MS strategies to quantify Aβ, tau, and APOE protein levels in CSF with similar disease-association efficacy to that of traditional ELISA assays [189–191].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pannee, J., Portelius, E., Oppermann, M., Atkins, A., Hornshaw, M., Zegers, I., Höjrup, P., Minthon, L., Hansson, O., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., & Gobom, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Thermo Scientific, Kungens Kurva, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Thermo Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK
  • European Commission (BE)
  • Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
  • Lund University (SE)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Pannee, Josef
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2013-01-21
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
1021-1032
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1718599092
Cited by
105
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • Gun och Bertil Stohnes Stiftelse
  • EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research
  • Wolfson Foundation
  • Hjärnfonden
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Emil och Wera Cornells Stiftelse
  • Demensfonden
  • Sahlgrenska Akademin
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Pilot Projects, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Solid Phase Extraction, Chromatography, Reverse-Phase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review