Cited by 63Digital Mental Health InterventionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

How should a virtual agent present psychoeducation? Influence of verbal and textual presentation on adherence

Open access
Tielman, Myrthe L., Neerincx, Mark A., van Meggelen, Marieke, Franken, Ingmar, Brinkman, Willem-Paul·2018·Technology and Health Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: With the rise of autonomous e-mental health applications, virtual agents can play a major role in improving trustworthiness, therapy outcome and adherence. In these applications, it is important that patients adhere in the sense that they perform the tasks, but also that they adhere to the specific recommendations on how to do them well. One important construct in improving adherence is psychoeducation, information on the why and how of therapeutic interventions. In an e-mental health context, this can be delivered in two different ways: verbally by a (virtual) embodied conversational agent or just via text on the screen. The aim of this research is to study which presentation mode is preferable for improving adherence. METHODS: This study takes the approach of evaluating a specific part of a therapy, namely psychoeducation. This was done in a non-clinical sample, to first test the general constructs of the human-computer interaction. We performed an experimental study on the effect of presentation mode of psychoeducation on adherence. In this study, we took into account the moderating effects of attitude towards the virtual agent and recollection of the information. Within the paradigm of expressive writing, we asked participants (n= 46) to pick one of their worst memories to describe in a digital diary after receiving verbal or textual psychoeducation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We found that both the attitude towards the virtual agent and how well the psychoeducation was recollected were positively related to adherence in the form of task execution. Moreover, after controlling for the attitude to the agent and recollection, presentation of psychoeducation via text resulted in higher adherence than verbal presentation by the virtual agent did.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/thc-170899

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Shumaker SA, Ockene JK, Riekert KA, editors. The handbook of Health Behavior Change: Springer; 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tielman, M. L., Neerincx, M. A., van Meggelen, M., Franken, I., & Brinkman, W.-P.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Tielman, Myrthe L.
Venue
Technology and Health Care
Published
2018-02-06
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
1081-1096
ISSN
  • 0928-7329 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-7401
OpenAlex
W2743183116
Cited by
63
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Technology and Health Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
virtual agents, psychoeducation, medication adherence, e-mental health, embodied conversational agents, expressive writing, digital diaries
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Netherlands, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Telemedicine, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review