Cited by 130Digital Mental Health InterventionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIEmotion and Mood Recognition

Chatbots to Support Young Adults’ Mental Health: An Exploratory Study of Acceptability

Open access
Koulouri, Theodora, Macredie, Robert D., Olakitan, David·2022·ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of mental health conditions, stigma, lack of awareness, and limited resources impede access to care, creating a need to improve mental health support. The recent surge in scientific and commercial interest in conversational agents and their potential to improve diagnosis and treatment seems a potentially fruitful area in this respect, particularly for young adults who widely use such systems in other contexts. Yet, there is little research that considers the acceptability of conversational agents in mental health. This study, therefore, presents three research activities that explore whether conversational agents and, in particular, chatbots can be an acceptable solution in mental healthcare for young adults. First, a survey of young adults (in a university setting) provides an understanding of the landscape of mental health in this age group and of their views around mental health technology, including chatbots. Second, a literature review synthesises current evidence relating to the acceptability of mental health conversational agents and points to future research priorities. Third, interviews with counsellors who work with young adults, supported by a chatbot prototype and user-centred design techniques, reveal the perceived benefits and potential roles of mental health chatbots from the perspective of mental health professionals, while suggesting preconditions for the acceptability of the technology. Taken together, these research activities: provide evidence that chatbots are an acceptable solution to offering mental health support for young adults; identify specific challenges relating to both the technology and environment; and argue for the application of user-centred approaches during development of mental health chatbots and more systematic and rigorous evaluations of the resulting solutions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3485874

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Justification for focusing on the young population is rooted in prior research demonstrating distinctive preferences, attitudes, and utilization patterns compared to adults.

    “Justification for focusing on the young population is rooted in prior research demonstrating distinctive preferences, attitudes, and utilization patterns compared to adults17,18.”

    From Use of automated conversational agents in improving young population mental health: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Methods and Results sections describe young adults’ attitudes toward mental-health technology and their patterns of seeking support and using apps. Section 5.2 compares young adults with counsellors, but the paper does not establish that their preferences, attitudes, or utilization patterns differ from those of older adults. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. B. Inkster, S. Sarda, and V. Subramanian. 2018. An empathy-driven, conversational artificial intelligence agent (WYSA) for digital mental well-being: Real-world data evaluation mixed-methods study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 6, 11 (2018), e12106. DOI:10.2196/MHEALTH.12106 · DOI
  2. Michael McTear, Zoraida Callejas, and David Griol. 2016. The Conversational Interface: Talking to Smart Devices (1st ed.). Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
  3. J. Nielsen. 1994. Usability inspection methods. Retrieved from http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/270000/260531/p413- nielsen.pdf?ip=5.70.15.114&id=260531&acc=ACTIVESERVICE&key=BF07A2EE685417C5.E5A0F962EEDC4F14. 4D4702B0C3E38B35.4D4702B0C3E38B35&CFID=1010278983&CFTOKEN=82819229&__acm__=1514071142_ fb60f29883303e8aa93a0cfbb221b0ff. · DOI
  4. J. Preece, Y. Rogers, and H. Sharp. 2015. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-computer Interaction. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Interaction+Design%3A+Beyond+Human+Computer+ Interaction%2C+4th+Edition-p-9781119020752.
  5. S. Suganuma, D. Sakamoto, and H. Shimoyama. 2018. An embodied conversational agent for unguided internet-based cognitive behavior therapy in preventative mental health: Feasibility and acceptability pilot trial'. JMIR Ment. Health 5, 3 (2018), e10454. DOI:10.2196/MENTAL.10454 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koulouri, T., Macredie, R. D., & Olakitan, D.
Affiliations
Brunel University of London (GB)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
Published
2022-06-30
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
1-39
ISSN
  • 2160-6455 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-6463
OpenAlex
W3200630942
Cited by
127
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 1
FWCI
20.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
mental health chatbots, chatbots, young adults, acceptability, mental health technology, user-centered design, chatbot prototype, mental health stigma, access to mental health care, chatbot evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review