CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

ChatGPT in Research and Education: A SWOT Analysis of Its Academic Impact

Open access
Miah, Abu Saleh Musa, Tusher, Md Mahbubur Rahman, Hossain, Md. Moazzem, Hossain, Md Mamun, Rahim, Md Abdur, Hamid, Md Ekramul, Islam, Md. Saiful, Shin, Jungpil·2025·Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences
DOI 10.32604/cmes.2025.064168
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Advanced artificial intelligence technologies such as ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) have significantly impacted fields such as education and research in recent years. ChatGPT benefits students and educators b... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on Tech Science Press

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32604/cmes.2025.064168

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Forest plot analyses indicated standardized mean differences where AI-supported learning was dominant in experimental and quasi-experimental studies.

    “The forest plot analyses indicated the standardized mean differences where AI-supported learning was dominant in all kinds of experiment and quasi-experimental researches [25].”

    From HOW AI TOOLS (LIKE CHATGPT/GEMINI) AFFECT CRITICAL THINKING IN NURSING STUDENTS. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    Section 4.4 describes descriptive statistics, comparative analysis, and thematic analysis, but does not report forest plots or standardized mean differences. I searched for those terms and for AI-supported learning in experimental and quasi-experimental studies; no passage in our copy addresses the claimed result. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. Cong-Lem N, Soyoof A, Tsering D. A systematic review of the limitations and associated opportunities of ChatGPT. Int J Hum. 2024;1-16. doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2344142. · DOI
  2. Motlagh NY, Khajavi M, Sharifi A, Ahmadi M. The impact of artificial intelligence on the evolution of digital education: a comparative study of OpenAI text generation tools including ChatGPT, Bing chat, bard, and ernie. arXiv:2309.02029v1. 2023. · arXiv
  3. Sain ZH, Serban R, Abdullah NB, Thelma CC. Benefits and drawbacks of leveraging ChatGPT to enhance writing skills in secondary education. At-Tadzkir: Islam Educ J. 2024;4(1):40-52. doi:10.59373/attadzkir.v4i1.79. · DOI
  4. Allam H, Dempere J, Lazaros E, Davison C, Kalota F, Hua D. Unleashing educational potential: Integrating ChatGPT in the classroom. In: HCT International General Education Conference (HCTIGEC 2024). Paris, France: Atlantis Press; 2025. p. 164-73.
  5. Kétyi A, Géring Z, Dén-Nagy I. ChatGPT from the students' point of view-Lessons from a pilot study using ChatGPT in business higher education. Soc Econ. 2025;47(1):1-21. doi:10.1556/204.2024.00007. · DOI
  6. Nikolopoulou K. Generative artificial intelligence and sustainable higher education: mapping the potential. J Digit Educ Technol. 2025;5(1):ep2506. doi:10.30935/jdet/15860. · DOI
  7. García-López IM, González González CS, Ramírez-Montoya MS, Molina-Espinosa JM. Challenges of implement- ing ChatGPT on education: systematic literature review. Int J Educ Res Open. 2025;8(5):100401. doi:10.1016/j.ijedro. 2024.100401. · DOI
  8. Jauhiainen JS, Bernardo Garagorry Guerra A. Educational evaluation with large language models (LLMs): ChatGPT-4 in recalling and evaluating students' written responses. J Inf Technol Educ Innov Pract. 2025;24:2. doi:10.28945/5433. · DOI
  9. Liu Y, Kong W, Merve K. ChatGPT applications in academic writing: a review of potential, limitations, and ethical challenges. Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmol. 2025;88(3):1-9. doi:10.5935/0004-2749.2024-0269. · DOI
  10. Stan MM, Dumitru C, Bucuroiu F. Investigating teachers' attitude toward integration of ChatGPT in language teaching and learning in higher education. Educ Inf Technol. 2025. doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13396-w. · DOI
  11. Davar NF, Ali Akber Dewan M, Zhang X. AI chatbots in education: challenges and opportunities. Information. 2025;16(3):235. doi:10.3390/info16030235. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Adarkwah MA, Badu SA, Osei EA, Adu-Gyamfi E, Odame J, Schneider K. ChatGPT in healthcare education: a double-edged sword of trends, challenges, and opportunities. Discov Educ. 2025;4(1):14. doi:10.1007/s44217-024- 00393-3. · DOI
  13. Oates A, Johnson D. ChatGPT in the classroom: evaluating its role in fostering critical evaluation skills. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2025;1-32. doi:10.1007/s40593-024-00452-8. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Zeb A, Rehman FU, Bin Othayman M, Rabnawaz M. Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT are fostering knowledge sharing, ethics, academia and libraries. Int J Inf Learn Technol. 2025;42(1):67-83. doi:10.1108/ijilt-03-2024-0046. · DOI
  15. Benboujja F, Hartnick E, Zablah E, Hersh C, Callans K, Villamor P, et al. Overcoming language barriers in pediatric care: a multilingual, AI-driven curriculum for global healthcare education. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1337395. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1337395. · DOI
  16. Busuttil L, Calleja J. Teachers' beliefs and practices about the potential of ChatGPT in teaching mathematics in secondary schools. Digit Exp Math Educ. 2025;11(1):140-66. doi:10.1007/s40751-024-00168-3. · DOI
  17. Engelbrecht J, Oates G, de Carvalho Borba M. Artificial intelligence and social media in mathematics education. In: Social media in the changing mathematics classroom. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025. p. 43-65. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-82837-9_3. · DOI
  18. Li M. The impact of ChatGPT on teaching and learning in higher education: challenges, opportunities, and future scope. In: Encyclopedia of information science and technology. 6th ed. Massey University, New Zealand: IGI Global; 2024. p. 1-20. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch079. · DOI
  19. Toma RB, Yánez-Pérez I. Factors influencing undergraduates' ethical use of ChatGPT: a reasoned goal pursuit approach. Interact Learn Environ. 2025;1-20. doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2457349. · DOI
  20. Allam H, Dempere J, Akre V, Parakash D, Mazher N, Ahamed J. Artificial intelligence in education: an argument of chat-GPT use in education. In: 2023 9th International Conference on Information Technology Trends (ITT); 2023 May 24-25; Dubai, United Arab Emirates: IEEE; 2023. p. 151-6. doi:10.1109/ITT59889.2023.10184267. · DOI
  21. Choi WC, Chang CI. Advantages and limitations of open-source versus commercial large language models (LLMs): a comparative study of deepseek and OpenAI's ChatGPT. 2025. doi:10.20944/preprints202503.1081.v2. · DOI
  22. Hossain MK, Al Younus MA. Teachers' perspectives on integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction. TESOL Commun. 2025;4(1):41-60. doi:10.58304/tc.20250103. · DOI
  23. Dimitriadou E, Lanitis A. A critical evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives of using artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in smart classrooms. Smart Learn Environ. 2023;10(1):12. doi:10.1186/s40561-023- 00231-3. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Cao J, Li M, Wen M, Cheung SC. A study on prompt design, advantages and limitations of ChatGPT for deep learning program repair. Autom Softw Eng. 2025;32(1):30. doi:10.1007/s10515-025-00492-x. · DOI
  25. Rudolph J, Tan S, Tan S. ChatGPT: bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? J Appl Learn Teach. 2023;6(1):342-63. doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Fijačko N, Gosak L, Štiglic G, Picard CT, Douma MJ. Can ChatGPT pass the life support exams without entering the American heart association course? Resuscitation. 2023;185(1):109732. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109732. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hargreaves S. Words are flowing out like endless rain into a paper cup': ChatGPT & law school assessments. SSRN. 2023. [cited 2023 Mar 10]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4359407.
  28. Topsakal O, Topsakal E. Framework for a foreign language teaching software for children utilizing AR, voicebots and ChatGPT (large language models). J Cogn Syst. 2022;7(2):33-8. doi:10.52876/jcs.1227392. · DOI
  29. Zhai X. ChatGPT for next generation science learning. SSRN J. 2023. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4331313. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Baidoo-Anu D, Owusu Ansah L. Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN J. 2023. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4337484. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Wang X, Gong Z, Wang G, Jia J, Xu Y, Zhao J, et al. ChatGPT performs on the Chinese national medical licensing examination. J Med Syst. 2023;47(1):86. doi:10.1007/s10916-023-01961-0. · DOI
  32. Susnjak T. ChatGPT: the end of online exam integrity? arXiv:2212.09292v1. 2022. · arXiv
  33. Choi JH, Hickman KE, Monahan A, Schwarcz D. ChatGPT goes to law school. SSRN. 2023. [cited 2023 Mar 10]. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4335905.
  34. Perkins M. Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. J Univ Teach Learn Pract. 2023;20(2). doi:10.53761/1.20.02.07. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Geerling W, Mateer GD, Wooten J, Damodaran N. ChatGPT has mastered the principles of economics: now what? SSRN J. 2023. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4356034. · DOI
  36. de Winter JCF. Can ChatGPT pass high school exams on English language comprehension? 2023. [cited 2023 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366659237_Can_ChatGPT_pass_high_school_ exams_on_English_Language_Comprehension.
  37. Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, Sillos C, De Leon L, Elepaño C, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS Digit Health. 2023;2(2):e0000198. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Abouammoh N, Alhasan K, Aljamaan F, Raina R, Malki KH, Altamimi I, et al. Perceptions and earliest experi- ences of medical students and faculty with ChatGPT in medical education: qualitative study. JMIR Med Educ. 2025;11:e63400. doi:10.2196/63400. · DOI
  39. Görgülü D, Coşkun F, Demir M, Sipahioglu M. A psychometric analysis of the artificial intelligence skills scale developed through ChatGPT. Educ Inf Technol. 2025. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13294-7. · DOI
  40. Frieder S, Pinchetti L, Chevalier A, Griffiths RR, Salvatori T, Lukasiewicz T, et al. Mathematical capabilities of ChatGPT. arXiv:2301.13867v2. 2023. · arXiv
  41. Pepin B, Buchholtz N, Salinas-Hernández U. Mathematics education in the era of ChatGPT: investigating its mean- ing and use for school and university education-editorial to special issue. Digit Exp Math Educ. 2025;11(1):1-8. doi:10.1007/s40751-025-00173-0. · DOI
  42. Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, Socrates V, Chi L, Taylor RA, et al. How does ChatGPT perform on the United States medical licensing examination (USMLE)? the implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9(4):e45312. doi:10.2196/45312. · DOI · Paper page
  43. De Leon Evangelista E. Ensuring academic integrity in the age of ChatGPT: rethinking exam design, assessment strategies, and ethical AI policies in higher education. Contemp Educ Technol. 2025;17(1):ep559. doi:10.30935/ cedtech/15775. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Mogali SR. Initial impressions of ChatGPT for anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2024;17(2):444-7. doi:10.1002/ ase.2261. · DOI · Paper page
  45. Megahed FM, Chen YJ, Ferris JA, Knoth S, Jones-Farmer LA. How generative AI models such as ChatGPT can be (mis)used in SPC practice, education, and research? an exploratory study. arXiv:2302.10916v1. 2023. · arXiv
  46. Bishop L. A computer wrote this paper: what ChatGPT means for education, research, and writing. SSRN J. 2023. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4338981. · DOI
  47. Ventayen RJM. OpenAI ChatGPT-generated results: similarity index of artificial intelligence-based contents. In: Soft computing for security applications. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 215-26. doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3608-3_15. · DOI
  48. Stutz P, Elixhauser M, Grubinger-Preiner J, Linner V, Reibersdorfer-Adelsberger E, Traun C, et al. Ch(e)atGPT? an anecdotal approach addressing the impact of ChatGPT on teaching and learning GIScience. GI_Forum. 2023;1:140-7. doi:10.1553/giscience2023_01_s140. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Qadir J. Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. In: 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2023 May 1-4; Kuwait, Kuwait: IEEE; 2023. p. 1-9. doi:10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Al-Naser Y, Halka F, Ng B, Mountford D, Sharma S, Ken N, et al. Evaluating artificial intelligence competency in education: performance of ChatGPT-4 in the American registry of radiologic technologists (ARRT) radiography certification exam. Acad Radiol. 2025;32(2):597-603. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.009. · DOI
  51. Han Z, Battaglia F, Udaiyar A, Fooks A, Terlecky SR. An explorative assessment of ChatGPT as an aid in medical education: use it with caution. Med Teach. 2024;46(5):657-64. doi:10.1080/0142159x.2023.2271159. · DOI
  52. Burisch C, Bellary A, Breuckmann F, Ehlers J, Thal SC, Sellmann T, et al. ChatGPT-4 performance on German continuing medical education-friend or foe (trick or treat)? protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025;14:e63887. doi:10.2196/63887. · DOI
  53. Zeng H, Zhu Z, Hu J, Cui Y. Application of ChatGPT-assisted problem-based learning teaching method in clinical medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):50. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06321-1. · DOI
  54. Yu H, Guo Y, Yang H, Zhang W, Dong Y. Can ChatGPT revolutionize language learning? unveiling the power of AI in multilingual education through user insights and pedagogical impact. Eur J Educ. 2025;60(1):e12749. doi:10. 1111/ejed.12749. · DOI
  55. Luu DKC, Bui DBH. The utilization of chat-GPT 3.5 for vocabulary learning: a study on students' perceptions. Acoj. 2025;16(1):226-52. doi:10.54855/acoj.2516111. · DOI
  56. Newton PM. ChatGPT performance on MCQ-based exams. 2023. doi:10.35542/osf.io/sytu3. · DOI
  57. Sun H. Are ChatGPT's knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: a descriptive study. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:1. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2023. 20.1. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Khairatun Hisan U, Miftahul Amri M. ChatGPT and medical education: a double-edged sword. J Pedagogy Educ Sci. 2023;2(1):71-89. doi:10.56741/jpes.v2i01.302. · DOI · Paper page
  59. Vebibina A, Rusijono R, Mariono A, Muafa A, Kurniawan D, Sugeng Dewantoro R, et al. 11 key strategies in using AI chatGPT to develop HOTS-based entrepreneurship questionnaires. Qubahan Acad J. 2025;5(1):33-62. doi:10. 48161/qaj.v5n1a1134. · DOI
  60. Songsiengchai S. Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI): ChatGPT for effective English language learning among Thai students in higher education. Int J Educ Lit Stud. 2025;13(1):302-12. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.13n.1p.302. · DOI
  61. Karafil B, Uyar A. Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices of academics in the field of educational sciences towards using ChatGPT. Educ Inf Technol. 2025. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13291-w. · DOI
  62. Ali F, OpenAI Inc C. Let the devil speak for itself: should ChatGPT be allowed or banned in hospitality and tourism schools? J Glob Hosp Tour. 2023;2(1):1-6. doi:10.5038/2771-5957.2.1.1016. · DOI
  63. Khan RA, Jawaid M, Khan AR, Sajjad M. ChatGPT-Reshaping medical education and clinical management. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(2). doi:10.12669/pjms.39.2.7653. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Al-Worafi YM, Hermansyah A, Goh KW, Ming LC. Artificial intelligence use in university: should we ban ChatGPT? 2023. [cited 2023 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202302.0400/v1.
  65. Chang CC, Hwang GJ. ChatGPT-facilitated professional development: evidence from professional trainers' learning achievements, self-worth, and self-confidence. Interact Learn Environ. 2025;33(1):883-900. doi:10.1080/ 10494820.2024.2362798. · DOI
  66. Schulze Balhorn L, Weber JM, Buijsman S, Hildebrandt JR, Ziefle M, Schweidtmann AM. Empirical assessment of ChatGPT's answering capabilities in natural science and engineering. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):4998. doi:10.1038/s41598- 024-54936-7. · DOI
  67. King MR, chatGPT. A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2023;16(1):1-2. doi:10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8. · DOI · Paper page
  68. Willems J. Chatgpt at universities-the least of our concerns; 2023. [cited 2023 Mar 1]. Available from: https://ssrn. com/abstract=4334162.
  69. Fareed MW. Introducing ChatGPT to education in science museums: a conceptual framework. J Mus Educ. 2025. doi:10.1080/10598650.2024.2440287. · DOI
  70. Fotaris P, Mastoras T, Lameras P. Designing educational escape rooms with generative AI: a framework and ChatGPT prompt engineering guide. Eur Conf Games Based Learn. 2023;17(1):180-9. doi:10.34190/ecgbl.17.1.1870. · DOI
  71. Sánchez-Ruiz LM, Moll-López S, Nuñez-Pérez A, Moraño-Fernández JA, Vega-Fleitas E. ChatGPT challenges blended learning methodologies in engineering education: a case study in mathematics. Appl Sci. 2023;13(10):6039. doi:10.3390/app13106039. · DOI
  72. Plevris V, Papazafeiropoulos G, Jiménez Rios A. Chatbots put to the test in math and logic problems: a comparison and assessment of ChatGPT-3. 5, ChatGPT-4, and google bard. AI. 2023;4(4):949-69. doi:10.3390/ai4040048. · DOI
  73. Bouriami A, Takhdat K, Barkatou S, Chiki H, Boussaa S, El Adib AR. Insights into nurse educators' use of ChatGPT in active teaching methods: a cross-sectional pilot study. Educ Médica. 2025;26(2):101006. doi:10.1016/j.edumed. 2024.101006. · DOI
  74. Ugraş H, Ugraş M. ChatGPT in early childhood STEM education: can it be an innovative tool to overcome challenges? Educ Inf Technol. 2025;30(4):4277-305. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12960-0. 100. · DOI
  75. Valeri F, Nilsson P, Cederqvist AM. Exploring students' experience of ChatGPT in STEM education. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2025;8(1):100360. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100360. 101. Tan AA, Huda M, Rohim MA, Hassan TRR, Ismail A, Siregar M. ChatGPT in supporting education instruction sector: An empirical. In: Proceedings of Ninth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology: ICICT 2024; 2025; London: Springer Nature. Vol. 9, 13 p. 102. Feng Z, Hu G, Li B, Wang J. Unleashing the power of ChatGPT in finance research: opportunities and challenges. Financ Innov. 2025;11(1):93. doi:10.1186/s40854-025-00770-3. 103. Piszcz A, Rojek I, Mikołajewski D. Impact of virtual reality on brain-computer interface performance in IoT control-review of current state of knowledge. Appl Sci. 2024;14(22):10541. doi:10.3390/app142210541. 104. · DOI
  76. Luzzi M, Guerriero F, Maratea M, Greco G, Garofalo M. ChatGPT and operations research: evaluation on the shortest path problem. Soft Comput. 2025;29(3):1407-18. doi:10.1007/s00500-025-10505-2. 119. Ay BT, Mercan ÖB, Helli SS, Tanberk S. Data augmentation with ChatGPT for text to sign language gloss translation. In: 2024 International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA); 2024 Oct 24-25; Stary Smokovec, Slovakia: IEEE; 2024. p. 14-21. doi:10.1109/ICETA63795.2024.10850860. 120. Xie E, Xiong G, Yang H, Coleman O, Kennedy M, Zhang A. Leveraging grounded large language models to auto- mate educational presentation generation. In: Large foundation models for educational assessment. Vancouver, BC, Canada: PMLR; 2025. p. 207-20. 121. Koubaa A, Boulila W, Ghouti L, Alzahem A, Latif S. Exploring ChatGPT capabilities and limitations: a survey. IEEE Access. 2023;11:118698-721. doi:10.1109/access.2023.3326474. 122. Reyes Palomino SE. AI-enhanced language design -ChatGPT: bibliometric analysis and potential uses in the conservation and restoration of tropical ecosystems. Rev Kawsaypacha Soc Y Medio Ambiente. 2025;2025(15):D-7. doi:10.18800/kawsaypacha.202501.d007. 123. Miah ASM, Shin J, Islam MM, Abdullah, Molla MKI. Natural human emotion recognition based on various mixed reality (MR) games and electroencephalography (EEG) signals. In: 2022 IEEE 5th Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation (ECEI); 2022 Feb 10-12; Taipei, Taiwan: IEEE. p. 408-11. doi:10.1109/ECEI53102.2022. 9829482. 124. Lin CCJ, Krzyz EZ, Tsai SHL, Wang YC, Chang CW, Lin TY, et al. A comparative analysis between ChatGPT versus NASS clinical guidelines for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. NASSJ. 2025;22(4):100599. doi:10.1016/j.xnsj. 2025.100599. 125. Almanasra S, Suwais K. Analysis of ChatGPT-generated codes across multiple programming languages. IEEE Access. 2025;13:23580-96. doi:10.1109/access.2025.3538050. 126. Taktak F. AI-enhanced geomatics engineering: innovative solutions and applications using ChatGPT, an advanced AI language model. Int J Eng Geosci. 2025;10(1):36-45. doi:10.26833/ijeg.1510209. 127. Saparamadu PVIN, Sepasgozar S, Guruge RND, Jayasena HS, Darejeh A, Ebrahimzadeh SM, et al. Optimising contract interpretations with large language models: a comparative evaluation of a vector database-powered chatbot vs. ChatGPT Buildings. 2025;15(7):1144. doi:10.3390/buildings15071144. 128. · DOI
  77. Tian F, Lu Y, Liu F, Ma G, Zong N, Wang X, et al. Supervised abnormal event detection based on ChatGPT attention mechanism. Multimed Tools Appl. 2024;83(41):89501-19. doi:10.1007/s11042-024-18551-y. 129. Sufi F. Just-in-time news: an AI chatbot for the modern information age. AI. 2025;6(2):22. doi:10.3390/ai6020022. 130. Amin MM, Mao R, Cambria E, Schuller BW. A wide evaluation of ChatGPT on affective computing tasks. IEEE Trans Affect Comput. 2024;15(4):2204-12. doi:10.1109/TAFFC.2024.3419593. 131. Kowalchuk P, Grotte A, Brandsberg-Dahl S, Sabharwal V, Jensen UV. Large language model-based workflow for optimizing offset well data analysis and generating well design risk profiles. In: Offshore Technology Conference; 2025 May 5-8; Houston, TX, USA: OTC; 2025. doi:10.4043/35607-ms. 132. Wu X, Whittington D, Chen YJ, Zuo R. The role of generative AI in navigating trade-offs in policy research design: balancing validity, rigour, and innovation. J Asian Public Policy. 2024. doi:10.1080/17516234.2024.2425874. 133. Blake J, Miah ASM, Kredens K, Shin J. Detection of AI-generated texts: a Bi-LSTM and attention-based approach. IEEE Access. 2025;13(8):71563-76. doi:10.1109/access.2025.3562750. 134 · DOI
  78. Rashid Z, Ahmed H, Nadeem N, Zafar SB, Yousaf MZ. The paradigm of digital health: AI applications and transformative trends. Neural Comput Appl. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00521-025-11081-0. 135. Zhang H, Shao H. Exploring the latest applications of OpenAI and ChatGPT: an in-depth survey. Comput Model Eng Sci. 2024;138(3):2061-102. doi:10.32604/cmes.2023.030649. 136. Kayalı B, Yavuz M, Balat Ş, Çalışan M. Investigation of student experiences with ChatGPT-supported online learning applications in higher education. Australas J Educ Technol. 2023;39(5):20-39. doi:10.14742/ajet.8915. 137. Jamil Uddin SM, Albert A, Tamanna M, Ovid A, Alsharef A. ChatGPT as an educational resource for civil engineering students. Comp Applic Engineering. 2024;32(4):e22747. doi:10.1002/cae.22747. 138. Prakasha GS. User experiences of ChatGPT among engineering students, teachers and working professionals in India. J Educ Online. 2024;21(2). doi:10.9743/jeo.2024.21.2.12. 139. ChatGPT User Reviews-kaggle.com. [cited 2025 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ bhavikjikadara/chatgpt-user-feedback. 140. · DOI
  79. Team G, Georgiev P, Lei VI, Burnell R, Bai R, Gulati L, et al. Gemini 1.5: unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context. arXiv:2403.05530v5. 2024. 155. Kuo M, Zhang J, Ding A, Wang Q, DiValentin L, Bao Y, et al. H-CoT: hijacking the chain-of-thought safety reasoning mechanism to jailbreak large reasoning models, including OpenAI o1/o3, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemini 2.0 flash thinking. arXiv:2502.12893. 2025. 156. Menendez HD, Bello-Orgaz G, Atencia CR. DeepStableYolo: DeepSeek-driven prompt engineering and search- based optimization for AI image generation. In: XVI Congreso Espanol de Metaheuristicas, Algoritmos Evolutivos y Bioinspirados. Donostia-San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain; 2025. 157. Kim D, Kim T, Kim Y, Byun YH, Yun TS. A ChatGPT-MATLAB framework for numerical modeling in geotechnical engineering applications. Comput Geotech. 2024;169(6):106237. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106237. 158. Lee G, Latif E, Shi L, and Zhai X. Gemini pro defeated by GPT-4V: Evidence from education. arXiv:2401.08660. 2023. 159. Gao T, Jin J, Ke ZT, Moryoussef GA. A comparison of DeepSeek and other LLMs. arXiv:2502.03688. 2025. 160. Mondillo G, Colosimo S, Perrotta A, Frattolillo V, Masino M. Comparative evaluation of advanced AI reasoning models in pediatric clinical decision support: ChatGPT O1 vs. DeepSeek-R1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2025. 161. Belaroussi R. Subjective assessment of a built environment by ChatGPT, Gemini and Grok: comparison with architecture, engineering and construction expert perception. Big Data Cogn Comput. 2025;9(4):100. doi:10.3390/ bdcc9040100. 162. Jiang Q, Gao Z, Karniadakis GE. DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT vs. Claude: a comparative study for scientific computing and scientific machine learning tasks. Theoreti Applied Mechanic Letter. 2025;15(3):100583. 163. Rakhmatulla N, Iroda N, Kakhramonjon A, Rustambek R, Bekhzodbek R, Ruziev S. AI-powered orthodontics: revolutionizing diagnosis, planning, and education with DeepSeek, Grok 3, and ChatGPT. 2025. doi:10.20944/ preprints202503.1686.v1. 164. Kotsis KT. ChatGPT and DeepSeek evaluate one another for science education. EIKI J Eff Teach Meth. 2025;3(1). doi:10.59652/jetm.v3i1.439. 165. Maiti A, Adewumi S, Tikure TA, Wang Z, Sengupta N, Sukhanova A, et al. Comparative analysis of OpenAI GPT-4o and DeepSeek R1 for scientific text categorization using prompt engineering. arXiv:2503.02032v1. 2025. 166. AlSagri HS, Farhat F, Sohail SS, Saudagar AKJ. ChatGPT or Gemini: who makes the better scientific writing assistant? J Acad Ethics. 2024;1-15. doi:10.1007/s10805-024-09549-0. 167. Rahman A, Mahir SH, Tashrif MTA, Aishi AA, Karim MA, Kundu D, et al. Comparative analysis based on DeepSeek, ChatGPT, and Google Gemini: features, techniques, performance, future prospects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.04783. 2025. 168. Xu P, Wu Y, Jin K, Chen X, He M, Shi D. DeepSeek-R1 outperforms Gemini 2.0 Pro, OpenAI o1, and o3-mini in bilingual complex ophthalmology reasoning. arXiv:2502.17947v1. 2025. 169. · DOI
  80. Marcaccini G, Seth I, Xie Y, Susini P, Pozzi M, Cuomo R, et al. Breaking bones, breaking barriers: ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini in hand fracture management. J Clin Med. 2025;14(6):1983. doi:10.3390/jcm14061983. 170. Özcivelek T, Özcan B. Comparative evaluation of responses from DeepSeek-R1, ChatGPT-o1, ChatGPT-4, and den- tal GPT chatbots to patient inquiries about dental and maxillofacial prostheses. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):871. doi:10.1186/s12903-025-06267-w. 171. · DOI
  81. Recinella G, Altini C, Cupardo M, Cricelli I, Maestri L. Comparative accuracy of ChatGPT-o1, DeepSeek R1, and Gemini 2.0 in answering general primary care questions. medRxiv. 2025. doi:10.1101/2025.04.15.25325518. 172. Gupta R. Comparative analysis of deepseek R1, ChatGPT, Gemini, Alibaba, and LLaMA: performance, reasoning capabilities, and political bias. Authorea Preprints. 2025;1-30. doi:10.22541/au.173921625.50315230/v1. 173. Shakya R, Vadiee F, Khalil M. A showdown of ChatGPT vs DeepSeek in solving programming tasks. arXiv:2503.13549v1. 2025. 174. Fernandes D, Matos-Carvalho JP, Fernandes CM, Fachada N. DeepSeek-V3, GPT-4, Phi-4, and LLaMA-3. · DOI
  82. generate correct code for LoRaWAN-related engineering tasks. arXiv:2502.14926v3. 2025. 175. Manik MMH. ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek: a comparative study on AI-based code generation. arXiv:2502.18467v1. 2025. 176. Albuhairy MM, Algaraady J. ChatGPT: comparative efficacy in reasoning for adults' second language acquisition analysis. Hesj. 2025;2025(44):864-83. doi:10.55074/hesj.vi44.1313. 177. Alhur A. Redefining healthcare with artificial intelligence (AI): the contributions of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Co- pilot. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e57795. doi:10.7759/cureus.57795. 178. · DOI · Paper page
  83. Rane N, Choudhary S, Rane J. Gemini versus ChatGPT: applications, performance, architecture, capabilities, and implementation. J Appl Artif Intell. 2024;5(1):69-93. doi:10.48185/jaai.v5i1.1052. 179. Aydin O, Karaarslan E, Erenay FS, Bacanin N. Generative AI in academic writing: a comparison of DeepSeek, Qwen, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, and Gemma. arXiv:2503.04765v2. 2025. 180. de Carvalho Souza ME, Li WG. Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT and DeepSeek: comparison and applications in conversational artificial intelligence. Inteligencia Artif. 2025;2(1):1-8. 181. Jegham N, Abdelatti M, Hendawi A. Visual reasoning evaluation of Grok, Deepseek Janus, Gemini, Qwen, Mistral, and ChatGPT. arXiv:2502.16428v1. 2025. 182. Adinath DR, Smiju IS. Advancements in AI-powered NLP models: a critical analysis of manus AI, Gemini, Grok AI, DeepSeek, and ChatGPT. 2025. doi:10.2139/ssrn.5125445. 183. Tangsrivimol JA, Darzidehkalani E, Virk HUH, Wang Z, Egger J, Wang M, et al. Benefits, limits, and risks of ChatGPT in medicine. Front Artif Intell. 2025;8:1518049. doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1518049. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miah, A. S. M., Tusher, M. M. R., Hossain, M. M., Hossain, M. M., Rahim, M. A., Hamid, M. E., Islam, M. S., & Shin, J.
Affiliations
University of Aizu (JP)
ORCID
Venue
Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences
Publisher
Tech Science Press
Published
2025
Volume
143
Issue
3
Pages
2573-2614
ISSN
  • 1526-1492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-1506
DOI
10.32604/cmes.2025.064168
OpenAlex
W4411216727
Cited by
11
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Aizu
  • Rajshahi University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, research impact, artificial intelligence in education, SWOT analysis, generative AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review