The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines
Open accessAbstract
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Findings from the National Cancer Institute's National Lung Screening Trial established that lung cancer mortality in specific high‐risk groups can be reduced by annual screening with low‐dose computed tomography. These findings indicate that the adoption of lung cancer screening could save many lives. Based on the results of the National Lung Screening Trial, the American Cancer Society is issuing an initial guideline for lung cancer screening. This guideline recommends that clinicians with access to high‐volume, high‐quality lung cancer screening and treatment centers should initiate a discussion about screening with apparently healthy patients aged 55 years to 74 years who have at least a 30–pack‐year smoking history and who currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. A process of informed and shared decision‐making with a clinician related to the potential benefits, limitations, and harms associated with screening for lung cancer with low‐dose computed tomography should occur before any decision is made to initiate lung cancer screening. Smoking cessation counseling remains a high priority for clinical attention in discussions with current smokers, who should be informed of their continuing risk of lung cancer. Screening should not be viewed as an alternative to smoking cessation. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;. © 2013 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102873 · Cited by 11,064
Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors
Doll, R., Peto, R., Boreham, J., & Sutherland, I. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.ae · Cited by 2,920
Anxiety, fear of cancer, and perceived risk of cancer following lung cancer screening
Byrne, M. M., Weissfeld, J., & Roberts, M. S. (2008) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x08322013 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Hecht, H. S., Cronin, P., Blaha, M. J., Budoff, M. J., Kazerooni, E. A., Narula, J., Yankelevitz, D., & Abbara, S. (2017) · Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography · doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2016.11.003 · Cited by 492
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2020
Motzer, R. J., Jonasch, E., Michaelson, M. D., Nandagopal, L., Gore, J. L., George, S., Alva, A., Haas, N., Harrison, M. R., Plimack, E. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0054 · Cited by 287
Hecht, H. S., Cronin, P., Blaha, M. J., Budoff, M. J., Kazerooni, E. A., Narula, J., Yankelevitz, D., & Abbara, S. (2017) · Journal of Thoracic Imaging · doi:10.1097/rti.0000000000000287 · Cited by 127
The smell of lung disease: a review of the current status of electronic nose technology
van der Sar, I. G., Wijbenga, N., Nakshbandi, G., Aerts, J. G. J. V., Manintveld, O. C., Wijsenbeek, M. S., Hellemons, M. E., & Moor, C. C. (2021) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/s12931-021-01835-4 · Cited by 87
Prevalence of major risk factors and use of screening tests for cancer in the United States
Fedewa, S. A., Sauer, A. G., Siegel, R. L., & Jemal, A. (2015) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0134 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Wender, R., Fontham, E. T. H., Barrera, E., Colditz, G. A., Church, T. R., Ettinger, D. S., Etzioni, R., Flowers, C. R., Scott Gazelle, G., Kelsey, D. K., LaMonte, S. J., Michaelson, J. S., Oeffinger, K. C., Shih, Y. T., Sullivan, D. C., Travis, W., Walter, L., Wolf, A. M. D., Brawley, O. W., & Smith, R. A.
- Venue
- CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-11
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 106-117
- ISSN
- 0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-4863
- OpenAlex
- W2166521422
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 66.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.