Cited by 102Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Internet Addiction Test among college students

Open access
Lee, Kounseok, Lee, Hye-Kyung, Gyeong, Hyunsu, Yu, Byeongkwan, Song, Yul-Mai, Kim, Daeho·2013·Journal of Korean Medical Science

Abstract

We developed a Korean translation of the Internet Addiction Test (KIAT), widely used self-report for internet addiction and tested its reliability and validity in a sample of college students. Two hundred seventy-nine college students at a national university completed the KIAT. Internal consistency and two week test-retest reliability were calculated from the data, and principal component factor analysis was conducted. Participants also completed the Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire (IADQ), the Korea Internet addiction scale (K-scale), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for the criterion validity. Cronbach's alpha of the whole scale was 0.91, and test-retest reliability was also good (r = 0.73). The IADQ, the K-scale, and depressive symptoms were significantly correlated with the KIAT scores, demonstrating concurrent and convergent validity. The factor analysis extracted four factors (Excessive use, Dependence, Withdrawal, and Avoidance of reality) that accounted for 59% of total variance. The KIAT has outstanding internal consistency and high test-retest reliability. Also, the factor structure and validity data show that the KIAT is comparable to the original version. Thus, the KIAT is a psychometrically sound tool for assessing internet addiction in the Korean-speaking population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.5.763

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, K., Lee, H.-K., Gyeong, H., Yu, B., Song, Y.-M., & Kim, D.
Affiliations
  • Gongju National Hospital (KR)
  • Kongju National University (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Daeho
Venue
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Published
2013
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
763
ISSN
  • 1011-8934 (ISSN-L)
  • 1598-6357
OpenAlex
W2165389013
Cited by
102
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
22.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Korean Medical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
Internet Addiction Test, Korean translation, internet addiction, psychometric validation, university students, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, factor structure, depressive symptoms, cross-cultural adaptation
MeSH terms
Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Translating, Universities, Program Evaluation, Behavior, Addictive, Asian People, Young Adult, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review