Cited by 898Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use

Shapira, Nathan A., Goldsmith, Toby D., Keck, Paul E., Khosla, Uday M., McElroy, Susan L.·2000·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Problematic internet use has been described in the psychological literature as 'internet addiction' and 'pathological internet use'. However, there are no studies using face-to-face standardized psychiatric evaluations to identify behavioral characteristics, psychiatric comorbidity or family psychiatric history of individuals with this behavior. Methods Twenty individuals with problematic internet use were evaluated. Problematic internet use was defined as (1) uncontrollable, (2) markedly distressing, time-consuming or resulting in social, occupational or financial difficulties and (3) not solely present during hypomanic or manic symptoms. Evaluations included a semistructured interview about subjects' internet use, the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (SCID-IV), family psychiatric history and the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) modified for internet use. Results All (100%) subjects' problematic internet use met DSM-IV criteria for an impulse control disorder (ICD) not otherwise specified (NOS). All 20 subjects had at least one lifetime DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis in addition to their problematic internet use (mean+/-SD=5.1+/-3.5 diagnoses); 14 (70.0%) had a lifetime diagnosis of bipolar disorder (with 12 having bipolar I disorder). Limitations Methodological limitations of this study included its small sample size, evaluation of psychiatric diagnoses by unblinded investigators, and lack of a cont…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00107-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The frequency of psychiatric comorbidities is a common point to all addictions, particularly mood disorders and anxiety disorders.

    “La fréquence des comorbidités psychiatriques est également un point commun à l'ensemble des addictions, en particulier les troubles de l'humeur et les troubles anxieux [4, 7, 10, 19].”

    From Avant-propos : Les addictions sans drogues (2008) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shapira, N. A., Goldsmith, T. D., Keck, P. E., Khosla, U. M., & McElroy, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Shapira, Nathan A.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-01
Volume
57
Issue
1-3
Pages
267-272
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080120652
Cited by
898
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 49
FWCI
23.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
problematic internet use, internet addiction, impulse control disorders, bipolar disorder, psychiatric comorbidity, family history of mental illness, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, functional disability, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Female, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review