Cited by 499Marine and fisheries researchSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeMarine animal studies overview

Predicted habitat shifts of Pacific top predators in a changing climate

Hazen, Elliott L., Jorgensen, Salvador, Rykaczewski, Ryan R., Bograd, Steven J., Foley, David G., Jonsen, Ian D., Shaffer, Scott A., Dunne, John P. +3 more·2013·Nature Climate Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate1686

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hazen et al. (2013) estimated an optimum of around 20oC for yellowfin, while our results of both quotient analysis and GAM suggest a preference for waters of up to 30oC.

    “However, Hazen et al. (2013), using an extensive and detailed tagging dataset, estimated an optimum of around 20ºC for yellowfin, while our results of both the quotient analysis and the GAM suggest a preference for waters of up to 30ºC.”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Hazen et al. (2013)

  • In the case of albacore, our quotient analysis results for temperature preference (up to and beyond 20oC) are comparable to those of Hazen et al. (2013), while our GAM results suggest somewhat lower preferred values (around 15oC), more in line with Boyce et al. (2008) and Lan et al. (2012).

    “In the case of albacore, our quotient analysis results for temperature preference (up to and beyond 20ºC) are comparable to those of Hazen et al. (2013), while our GAM results suggest somewhat lower preferred values (around 15ºC), more in line with Boyce et al. (2008) and Lan et al. (2012).”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Hazen et al. (2013)

  • Changes in habitat qualities are highly likely to result in range shifts and redistributions.

    “Changes in habitat qualities are highly likely to result in range shifts and redistributions [99]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hazen, E. L., Jorgensen, S., Rykaczewski, R. R., Bograd, S. J., Foley, D. G., Jonsen, I. D., Shaffer, S. A., Dunne, J. P., Costa, D. P., Crowder, L. B., & Block, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • San Jose State University (US)
  • NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Hopkins Marine Station (US)
Corresponding author
Hazen, Elliott L.
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2012-09-23
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
234-238
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W2158073743
Cited by
499
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 2
FWCI
19.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
climate change, marine top predators, sea surface temperature, range shifts, species distribution, electronic monitoring, core habitat, biodiversity projections, North Pacific, northward range shift, migration timing, predator guilds, conservation management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review