Cited by 295Sleep and Work-Related FatigueHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Fatigue Countermeasures in Aviation

Caldwell, John A., Mallis, Melissa M., Caldwell, J. Lynn, Paul, Michel A., Miller, James C., Neri, David F.·2009·Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

Pilot fatigue is a significant problem in modern aviation operations, largely because of the unpredictable work hours, long duty periods, circadian disruptions, and insufficient sleep that are commonplace in both civilian and military flight operations. The full impact of fatigue is often underappreciated, but many of its deleterious effects have long been known. Compared to people who are well-rested, people who are sleep deprived think and move more slowly, make more mistakes, and have memory difficulties. These negative effects may and do lead to aviation errors and accidents. In the 1930s, flight time limitations, suggested layover durations, and aircrew sleep recommendations were developed in an attempt to mitigate aircrew fatigue. Unfortunately, there have been few changes to aircrew scheduling provisions and flight time limitations since the time they were first introduced, despite evidence that updates are needed. Although the scientific understanding of fatigue, sleep, shift work, and circadian physiology has advanced significantly over the past several decades, current regulations and industry practices have in large part failed to adequately incorporate the new knowledge. Thus, the problem of pilot fatigue has steadily increased along with fatigue-related concerns over air safety. Accident statistics, reports from pilots themselves, and operational flight studies all show that fatigue is a growing concern within aviation operations. This position paper reviews the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3357/asem.2435.2009

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caldwell, J. A., Mallis, M. M., Caldwell, J. L., Paul, M. A., Miller, J. C., & Neri, D. F.
Affiliations
Archinoetics (United States) (US)
Venue
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
29-59
ISSN
  • 0001-9402 (ISSN-L)
  • 0095-6562
OpenAlex
W1987324686
Cited by
295
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
FWCI
13.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
pilot fatigue, fatigue countermeasures, aviation safety, flight time limitations, circadian rhythm disruption, shift work, sleep deprivation, aviation law, aviation accidents, military aviation, civil aviation
MeSH terms
Accidents, Aviation, Aerospace Medicine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Circadian Rhythm, Fatigue, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Rest, Sleep Deprivation, Task Performance and Analysis, United States, Wakefulness, Work Schedule Tolerance, Occupational Health, Workload, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review