Cited by 299School Choice and PerformanceParental Involvement in EducationUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

Are High Quality Schools Enough to Close the Achievement Gap? Evidence from a Social Experiment in Harlem

Open access
Dobbie, Will, Fryer, Roland·2009·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

Harlem Children's Zone (HCZ), which combines community investments with reform minded charter schools, is one of the most ambitious social experiments to alleviate poverty of our time.We provide the first empirical test of the causal impact of HCZ on educational outcomes, with an eye toward informing the long-standing debate whether schools alone can eliminate the achievement gap or whether the issues that poor children bring to school are too much for educators alone to overcome.Both lottery and instrumental variable identification strategies lead us to the same story: Harlem Children's Zone is effective at increasing the achievement of the poorest minority children.Taken at face value, the effects in middle school are enough to close the black-white achievement gap in mathematics and reduce it by nearly half in English Language Arts.The effects in elementary school close the racial achievement gap in both subjects.We conclude by presenting four pieces of evidence that high-quality schools or high-quality schools coupled with community investments generate the achievement gains.Community investments alone cannot explain the results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w15473

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rigorous evaluation of the Harlem Children's Zone has shown that it eliminated racial gaps in academic achievement and was successful in improving housing conditions and childhood asthma outcomes.

    “Rigorous evaluation of the HCZ has shown that it eliminated racial gaps in academic achievement and was successful in improving housing conditions and childhood asthma outcomes [50,51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R.
Affiliations
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2009-11
OpenAlex
W1599415996
Cited by
299
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Keywords
achievement gap, charter schools, school quality, community investment, poverty, racial achievement gap, black-white gap, educational outcomes, lottery assignment, instrumental variables, junior high school, elementary school, Harlem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review