Cited by 92Climate Change Policy and EconomicsCapital Investment and Risk AnalysisClimate Change and Geoengineering

Applying Asset Pricing Theory to Calibrate the Price of Climate Risk

Open access
Daniel, Kent, Litterman, Robert, Wagner, Gernot·2016·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

Pricing greenhouse gas emissions involves making trade-offs between consumption today and unknown damages in the (distant) future.This setup calls for an optimal control model to determine the carbon dioxide (CO2) price.It also relies on society's willingness to substitute consumption across time and across uncertain states of nature, the forte of Epstein-Zin preference specifications.We develop the EZ-Climate model, a simple discrete-time optimization model in which uncertainty about the effect of CO2 emissions on global temperature and on eventual damages is gradually resolved over time.We embed a number of features including potential tail risk, exogenous and endogenous technological change, and backstop technologies.The EZ-Climate model suggests a high optimal carbon price today that is expected to decline over time as uncertainty about the damages is resolved.It also points to the importance of backstop technologies and to very large deadweight costs of delay.We decompose the optimal carbon price into two components: expected discounted damages and the risk premium.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w22795

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 128 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daniel, K., Litterman, R., & Wagner, G.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2016-11
OpenAlex
W2181820239
Cited by
91
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
Keywords
carbon pricing, climate risk, greenhouse gas emissions, Epstein-Zin preferences, optimal control, tail risk, technological change, backstop technology, risk premium, climate damages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review