Cited by 181Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceEducation and Public Policy

The Impact of Price Caps and Spending Cuts on U.S. Postsecondary Attainment

Open access
Deming, David, Walters, Christopher·2017·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

Increasing the postsecondary attainment rate of college-age youth is an important economic priority in the U.S. and in other developed countries.Yet little is known about whether different forms of public subsidy can increase degree completion.In this paper, we compare the impact of the marginal taxpayer dollar on postsecondary attainment when it is spent on lowering tuition prices versus increasing the quality of the college experience.We do so by estimating the causal impact of changes in tuition and spending on enrollment and degree completion in U.S. public postsecondary institutions between 1990 and 2013.We estimate these impacts using a newly assembled data set of legislative tuition caps and freezes, combined with variation in exposure to state budget shocks that is driven by differences in historical reliance on state appropriations.We find large impacts of spending on enrollment and degree completion.In contrast, we find no impact of price changes.Our estimates suggest that spending increases are more effective perdollar than price cuts as a means of increasing postsecondary attainment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w23736

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enrollment and attainment outcomes for public institutions are more sensitive to college expenditure shocks than to sticker price shocks.

    “Deming and Walters (2017) find that enrollment and attainment outcomes for public institutions are more sensitive to college expenditure shocks than to sticker price shocks.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Deming and Walters (2017)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke (2009): Mostly Harmless Econometrics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  2. Barr, A. and S. E. Turner (2013): "Expanding enrollments and contracting state budgets: the effect of the great recession on higher education," The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650, 168-193.
  3. Card, D. (2001): "Immigrant inflows, native outflows, and the local market impacts of higher immigration," Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 22-64.
  4. Deming, D. and S. Dynarski (2010): "College aid," in Targeting Investments in Children: Fighting Poverty When Resources are Limited, ed. by P. B. Levine and D. J. Zimmerman, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, chap. 10, 283-302.
  5. Ginsberg, B. (2011): The Fall of the Faculty, Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deming, D., & Walters, C.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2017-08
OpenAlex
W2749056983
Cited by
181
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
Keywords
postsecondary attainment, tuition freeze, higher education funding, graduation, college enrollment, state appropriations, government subsidies, college affordability, higher education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review