Cited by 270COVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact

Internal and External Effects of Social Distancing in a Pandemic

Open access
Farboodi, Maryam, Jarosch, Gregor, Shimer, Robert·2020·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

We develop a quantitative framework for exploring how individuals trade off the utility benefit of social activity against the internal and external health risks that come with social interactions during a pandemic.We calibrate the model to external targets and then compare its predictions with daily data on social activity, fatalities, and the estimated effective reproduction number R(t) from the COVID-19 pandemic in March-June 2020.While the laissez-faire equilibrium is consistent with much of the decline in social activity that we observed in US data, optimal policy further imposes immediate and highly persistent social distancing.Notably, neither equilibrium nor optimal social distancing is extremely restrictive, in the sense that the effective reproduction number never falls far below 1.The expected cost of COVID-19 in the US is substantial, $12,700 in the laissez-faire equilibrium and $8,100 per person under an optimal policy.Optimal policy generates this large welfare gain by shifting the composition of costs from fatalities to persistent social distancing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w27059

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social distancing can be related to increased stress and isolation.

    “Although a protective measure against the spread of COVID-19, social distancing can be related to increased stress and isolation (Farboodi et al., 2020; Hoffart et al., 2020).”

    From Evaluating Experiential Avoidance in terms of COVID-19 Fear and Pandemic Emotional Distress Symptoms Among Latinx Adults (2022) · cites this paper as Farboodi et al., 2020

    The Introduction reports that social distancing reduced social activity, including activities such as meeting friends, which supports the reduced-contact aspect of isolation. The paper models the costs of reduced social activity in §5.5, but our copy does not link distancing to increased stress or assess psychological isolation. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farboodi, M., Jarosch, G., & Shimer, R.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2020-04
OpenAlex
W3020418618
Cited by
270
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 103
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Keywords
social distancing, COVID-19 pandemic, social activity, effective reproduction number, optimal policy, fatality, social interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review