Cited by 25Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationInnovations in Medical Education

The Desire of Medical Students to Integrate Artificial Intelligence Into Medical Education: An Opinion Article

Open access
Frommeyer, Timothy C., Fursmidt, Reid M., Gilbert, Michael M., Bett, Ean S.·2022·Frontiers in Digital Health

Abstract

OPINION article Front. Digit. Health, 13 May 2022Sec. Personalized Medicine https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.831123

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fdgth.2022.831123

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contributions elaborated mainly or solely by medical students strongly call for the inclusion of AI education in medical curricula; students were enthusiastic about learning AI and recognized its crucial role in the future of medicine, but reported a lack of formal AI training and insufficient AI-related learning opportunities; researchers and educators also demanded inclusion of AI in medical Cur

    “Finally, contributions elaborated mainly or solely by medical students strongly call for the inclusion of AI education in medical curricula [50–54]. Students were enthusiastic about learning AI and recognized its crucial role in the future of medicine [45, 55]. However, they reported a lack of formal AI training and insufficient AI-related learning opportunities in their medical education [46, 56,”

    From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frommeyer, T. C., Fursmidt, R. M., Gilbert, M. M., & Bett, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Wright State University (US)
  • Ohio University (US)
Corresponding author
Frommeyer, Timothy C.
Venue
Frontiers in Digital Health
Published
2022-05-13
Volume
4
Pages
831123-831123
ISSN
2673-253X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280602135
Cited by
25
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, medical education, medical students, student attitudes, AI integration in education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review