Cited by 43Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationGene Regulatory Network Analysis

An Enhancer's Length and Composition Are Shaped by Its Regulatory Task

Open access
Li, Lily, Wunderlich, Zeba·2017·Frontiers in Genetics

Abstract

Enhancers drive the gene expression patterns required for virtually every process in metazoans. We propose that enhancer length and transcription factor (TF) binding site composition—the number and identity of TF binding sites— reflect the complexity of the enhancer’s regulatory task. In development, we define regulatory task complexity as the number of fates specified in a set of cells at once. We hypothesize that enhancers with more complex regulatory tasks will be longer, with more, but less specific, TF binding sites. Larger numbers of binding sites can be arranged in more ways, allowing enhancers to drive many distinct expression patterns, and therefore cell fates, using a finite number of TF inputs. We compare ~100 enhancers patterning the more complex anterior-posterior axis and the simpler dorsal-ventral axis in Drosophila and find that the anterior-posterior enhancers are longer with more, but less specific binding sites than the dorsal-ventral enhancers. Using a set of ~3500 enhancers, we find enhancer length and TF binding site number again increase with increasing regulatory task complexity. Therefore, to be broadly applicable, computational tools to study enhancers must account for differences in regulatory task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fgene.2017.00063

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A typical enhancer is probably hundreds of base-pairs in length and acts over a few to tens of kilobases.

    “Although the endogenous distributions of enhancer sizes and enhancer–gene distances remain an important topic of exploration, a typical enhancer is probably hundreds of base-pairs in length70,71, and acts over a few to tens of kilobases72.”

    From Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers (2020) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Introduction says enhancers can range from about 10 to 1,000 base pairs, so a length of hundreds of base pairs is consistent with the source. It does not establish that hundreds of base pairs is typical. The distance claim is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L., & Wunderlich, Z.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Wunderlich, Zeba
Venue
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2017-05-23
Volume
8
Pages
63-63
ISSN
1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620467763
Cited by
42
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R00HD073191)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (T32EB009418)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
transcription factor binding sites, anterior-posterior patterning, dorsoventral patterning, Drosophila, cell fate specification, gene expression patterns, enhancer evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review