Cited by 111Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Adjunctive Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus Probio-M9 Administration Enhances the Effect of Anti-PD-1 Antitumor Therapy via Restoring Antibiotic-Disrupted Gut Microbiota

Open access
Gao, Guangqi, Ma, Teng, Zhang, Tao, Jin, Hao, Li, Yalin, Kwok, Lai-Yu, Zhang, Heping, Sun, Zhihong·2021·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

Emerging evidence supports that the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy is associated with the host’s gut microbiota, as prior antibiotic intake often leads to poor outcome and low responsiveness toward ICB treatment. Therefore, we hypothesized that the efficacy of ICB therapy like anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) treatment required an intact host gut microbiota, and it was established that probiotics could enhance the recovery of gut microbiota disruption by external stimuli. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of the probiotics, Lactobacillus rhamnosus Probio-M9, on recovering antibiotic-disrupted gut microbiota and its impact on the outcome of ICB therapy in tumor-bearing mice. We first disrupted the mouse microbiota by antibiotics and then remediated the gut microbiota by probiotics or naturally. Tumor transplantation was then performed, followed by anti-PD-1-based antitumor therapy. Changes in the fecal metagenomes and the tumor suppression effect were monitored during different stages of the experiment. Our results showed that Probio-M9 synergized with ICB therapy, significantly improving tumor inhibition compared with groups not receiving the probiotic treatment ( P < 0.05 at most time points). The synergistic effect was accompanied by effective restoration of antibiotic-disrupted fecal microbiome that was characterized by a drastically reduced Shannon diversity value and shifted composition of dominating taxa. Moreover, probiotic administration significantly increased the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria (e.g., Bifidobacterium pseudolongum , Parabacteroides distasonis , and some Bacteroides species; 0.0001 < P < 0.05). The gut microbiome changes were accompanied by mild reshaping of the functional metagenomes characterized by enrichment in sugar degradation and vitamin and amino acid synthesis pathways. Collectively, this study supported that probiotic administration could enhance the efficacy and responsiveness of anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy, and Probio-M9 could be a potential candidate of microbe-based synergistic tumor therapeutics. The preclinical data obtained here would support the design of future human clinical trials for further consolidating the current findings and for safety assessment of probiotic adjunctive treatment in ICB therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2021.772532

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • F. prausnitzii or Lactobacillus rhamnosus restored ICB responses in the context of antibiotic-induced microbiota perturbation.

    “Other probiotics like F. prausnitzii (Bredon et al., 2024) or Lactobacillus rhamnosus (Gao et al., 2021) restored ICB responses in the context of antibiotic-induced microbiota perturbation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Almonte AA Rangarajan H Yip D Fahrer AM. How Does the Gut Microbiome Influence Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy? Immunol Cell Biol (2020) 99(4): 361–72. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12423 33147357 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, G., Ma, T., Zhang, T., Jin, H., Li, Y., Kwok, L.-Y., Zhang, H., & Sun, Z.
Affiliations
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Heping
  • Sun, Zhihong
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2021-12-14
Volume
12
Pages
772532-772532
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200535906
Cited by
111
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 13
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Agriculture Research System of China (31720103911, 2021ZD0014)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
probiotics, anti-PD-1 therapy, immune checkpoint blockade, gut microbiota, antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, microbiota restoration, cancer immunotherapy, tumor-bearing mice, fecal microbiota, metagenome, Bifidobacterium pseudolongum, Parabacteroides distasonis, Bacteroides, tumor suppression
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Feces, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Neoplasms, Probiotics, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review