Cited by 288Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersGut microbiota and healthImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Generation of systemic antitumour immunity via the in situ modulation of the gut microbiome by an orally administered inulin gel

Open access
Han, Kai, Nam, Jutaek, Xu, Jin, Sun, Xiaoqi, Huang, Xuehui, Animasahun, Olamide, Achreja, Abhinav, Jeon, Jin Heon +5 more·2021·Nature Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

The performance of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, which benefit only a subset of patients and can cause serious immune-related adverse events, underscores the need for strategies that induce T-cell immunity with minimal toxicity. The gut microbiota has been implicated in the outcomes of patients following cancer immunotherapy, yet manipulating the gut microbiome to achieve systemic antitumour immunity is challenging. Here we show in multiple murine tumour models that inulin-a widely consumed dietary fibre-formulated as a 'colon-retentive' orally administered gel can effectively modulate the gut microbiome in situ, induce systemic memory-T-cell responses and amplify the antitumour activity of the checkpoint inhibitor anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (α-PD-1). Orally delivered inulin-gel treatments increased the relative abundances of key commensal microorganisms and their short-chain-fatty-acid metabolites, and led to enhanced recall responses for interferon-γ+CD8+ T cells as well as to the establishment of stem-like T-cell factor-1+PD-1+CD8+ T cells within the tumour microenvironment. Gels for the in situ modulation of the gut microbiome may be applicable more broadly to treat pathologies associated with a dysregulated gut microbiome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41551-021-00749-2

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inulin gel reformulates the composition of gut microbiota and its metabolic outputs, invigorating the immune system and potentiating an antitumor-immune response.

    “This gel has the propensity to reformulate the composition of the gut microbiota and its metabolic outputs, consequently invigorating the immune system and potentiating an antitumor-immune response.224”

    From Drug repurposing for cancer therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [224]

    The Results sections on gut-microbiome modulation and microbial metabolites report changes in microbial composition and metabolites, alongside stronger antitumour CD8+ T-cell responses. But the pronounced immune and antitumour effects were observed with inulin gel plus α-PD-1 therapy; the Results section on antitumour efficacy says gel alone had only a modest effect. The citing sentence omits that treatment condition. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In animal models, oral administration of inulin gel significantly amplifies the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy while maintaining a safety profile.

    “Intriguingly, experimental studies on animal models have revealed that oral administration of inulin gel significantly amplifies the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy while maintaining an admirable safety profile.”

    From Drug repurposing for cancer therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [224]

  • A mouse study showed that orally administered inulin induced memory T cell responses and improved responses to anti-PD-1 therapy.

    “For instance, a mouse study showed that orally administered inulin induced memory T cell responses and improved responses to anti-PD-1 therapy (Han et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, K., Nam, J., Xu, J., Sun, X., Huang, X., Animasahun, O., Achreja, A., Jeon, J. H., Pursley, B., Kamada, N., Chen, G. Y., Nagrath, D., & Moon, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Moon, James J.
Venue
Nature Biomedical Engineering
Published
2021-06-24
Volume
5
Issue
11
Pages
1377-1388
ISSN
2157-846X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175731140
Cited by
287
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 8
FWCI
13.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI127070)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB022563)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK125087)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
inulin, gut microbiota modulation, antitumor immunity, immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-PD-1 therapy, dietary fiber, short-chain fatty acids, memory T cells, CD8+ T cells, tumor microenvironment, cancer immunotherapy, commensal bacteria
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Gels, Humans, Immunotherapy, Inulin, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review