Cited by 12Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesGene expression and cancer classificationRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies

Machine-learning algorithm-based prediction of a diagnostic model based on oxidative stress-related genes involved in immune infiltration in diabetic nephropathy patients

Open access
Zhu, Heng-Mei, Liu, Na, Sun, Dong-Xuan, Luo, Liang·2023·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the most prevalent microvascular consequence of diabetes and has recently risen to the position of the world’s second biggest cause of end-stage renal diseases. Growing studies suggest that oxidative stress (OS) responses are connected to the advancement of DN. This study aimed to developed a novel diagnostic model based on OS-related genes. The differentially expressed oxidative stress-related genes (DE-OSRGs) experiments required two human gene expression datasets, which were given by the GEO database (GSE30528 and GSE96804, respectively). The potential diagnostic genes were identified using the SVM-RFE assays and the LASSO regression model. CIBERSORT was used to determine the compositional patterns of the 22 different kinds of immune cell fraction seen in DN. These estimates were based on the combined cohorts. DN serum samples and normal samples were both subjected to RT-PCR in order to investigate the degree to which certain genes were expressed. In this study, we were able to locate 774 DE-OSRGs in DN. The three marker genes (DUSP1, PRDX6 and S100A8) were discovered via machine learning on two different machines. The high diagnostic value was validated by ROC tests, which focused on distinguishing DN samples from normal samples. The results of the CIBERSORT study suggested that DUSP1, PRDX6, and S100A8 may be associated to the alterations that occur in the immunological microenvironment of DN patients. Besides, the results of RT-PCR indicated that the expression of DUSP1, PRDX6, and S100A8 was much lower in DN serum samples compared normal serum samples. The diagnostic value of the proposed model was likewise verified in our cohort, with an area under the curve of 9.946. Overall, DUSP1, PRDX6, and S100A8 were identified to be the three diagnostic characteristic genes of DN. It’s possible that combining these genes will be effective in diagnosing DN and determining the extent of immune cell infiltration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202298

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most molecular-omics-driven DN prediction studies were single-center; only two transcriptomics studies utilized public multi-cohort integrative to enable external validation.

    “most studies were single-center; only two transcriptomics studies utilized public multi-cohort integrative to enable external validation [76, 77].”

    From Artificial intelligence-powered prediction of diabetic complications: from clinical data to molecular omics (2026) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Materials and methods section (no page given) says the study downloaded two public GEO expression datasets, GSE30528 and GSE96804. The Results section reports testing the diagnostic model on GSE96804 and then on GSE30528, supporting its use of a second cohort for validation. The paper does not establish that most other studies were single-center or that only two transcriptomics studies used this approach. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using ML, one study identified three key oxidative stress-related genes, DUSP1, PRDX6, and S100A8, with strong diagnostic value.

    “Using ML, one study identified three key oxidative stress-related genes, DUSP1, PRDX6, and S100A8, with strong diagnostic value [76]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, H.-M., Liu, N., Sun, D.-X., & Luo, L.
Affiliations
  • Third Hospital of Nanchang (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Ganzhou People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Luo, Liang
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2023-07-24
Volume
14
Pages
1202298-1202298
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385198380
Cited by
12
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality
  • Health Commission of Jiangxi Province
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Keywords
diabetic nephropathy, oxidative stress, diagnostic biomarkers, immune cell infiltration, MKP-1, peroxiredoxin 6, S100A8, differentially expressed genes, serum gene expression, tumor immune microenvironment
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Biological Assay, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Nephropathies, Humans, Oxidative Stress, Calgranulin A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review