CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tick bite-induced alpha-gal syndrome and immunologic responses in an alpha-gal deficient murine model

Sharma, Surendra Raj, Choudhary, Shailesh K., Vorobiov, Julia, Commins, Scott P., Karim, Shahid·2024·Frontiers in Immunology
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1336883PMC PMC10882631

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction: Alpha-Gal Syndrome (AGS) is a delayed allergic reaction due to specific IgE antibodies targeting galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal), a carbohydrate found in red meat. This condition has gained significant attention globally due to its increasing prevalence, with more than 450,000 cases estimated just in the United States alone. Previous research has established a connection between AGS and tick bites, which sensitize individuals to α-gal antigens and elevate the levels of specific IgE. However, the precise mechanism by which tick bites influence the host’s immune system and contribute to the development of AGS remains poorly understood. This study investigates various factors related to ticks and the host associated with the development of AGS following a tick bite, using mice with a targeted disruption of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase (AGKO) as a model organism. Methods: Lone-star tick ( Amblyomma americanum ) and gulf-coast tick ( Amblyomma maculatum ) nymphs were used to sensitize AGKO mice, followed by pork meat challenge. Tick bite site biopsies from sensitized and non-sensitized mice were subjected to mRNA gene expression analysis to assess the host immune response. Antibody responses in sensitized mice were also determined. Results: Our results showed a significant increase in the total IgE, IgG1, and α-gal IgG1 antibodies titers in the lone-star tick-sensitized AGKO mice compared to the gulf-coast tick-sensitized mice. Pork challenge in Am. americanum -sensitized mice led to a decline in body temperature after the meat challenge. Gene expression analysis revealed that Am. americanum bites direct mouse immunity toward Th2 and facilitate host sensitization to the α-gal antigen. Conclusion: This study supports the hypothesis that specific tick species may increase the risk of developing α-gal-specific IgE and hypersensitivity reactions or AGS, thereby providing opportunities for future research on the mechanistic role of tick and host-related factors in AGS development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1336883

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Sensitization of AGKO mice with tick nymphs. Schematics of tick-bite induced sensitization, collection of tick-bite site biopsy site for immune gene expression, and oral meat challenge (A). Quantitation of total IgE (B), alpha-gal specific IgE (C), total IgG1 (D), and alpha-gal specific IgG1 (E). Each dot represents an individual mouse and error bars represent the geometric mean with a 95% confidence interval. The dotted line shows a limit of detection of alpha-gal sIgE. Aa represents a group of mice (N=10) infested with Amblyomma americanum, Am represents a group of mice (N=6) infested with Amblyomma maculatum and Ctrl represents a group of mice with no infestation (N=16). Mice without nymph infestation exhibited untraceable total IgE, even at 60-fold plasma dilutions. IgE analysis plot includes six pooled replicate samples (from N=16) demonstrating IgE detection. The analysis plot for both total IgG1 and α-gal-specific IgG1 incorporated the examination of 10 replicate samples from control mice and those infested with Aa, along with 6 replicate samples from mice infested with Am. Fifteen nymphs were used per mouse in each round of infestation.
Figure 1 Sensitization of AGKO mice with tick nymphs. Schematics of tick-bite induced sensitization, collection of tick-bite site biopsy site for immune gene expression, and oral meat challenge (A). Quantitation of total IgE (B), alpha-gal specific IgE (C), total IgG1 (D), and alpha-gal specific IgG1 (E). Each dot represents an individual mouse and error bars represent the geometric mean with a 95% confidence interval. The dotted line shows a limit of detection of alpha-gal sIgE. Aa represents a group of mice (N=10) infested with Amblyomma americanum, Am represents a group of mice (N=6) infested with Amblyomma maculatum and Ctrl represents a group of mice with no infestation (N=16). Mice without nymph infestation exhibited untraceable total IgE, even at 60-fold plasma dilutions. IgE analysis plot includes six pooled replicate samples (from N=16) demonstrating IgE detection. The analysis plot for both total IgG1 and α-gal-specific IgG1 incorporated the examination of 10 replicate samples from control mice and those infested with Aa, along with 6 replicate samples from mice infested with Am. Fifteen nymphs were used per mouse in each round of infestation.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Anaphylaxis in tick infested mice following post-oral challenge with 400 mg of cooked pork kidney homogenates. Body temperature was recorded at baseline and post-oral challenge and a drop in body temperature >3 was considered as a sign of severe anaphylaxis. The two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test was performed for statistical significance; *** P<0.001; **** P<0.0001. Aa, Amblyomma americanum; Am, Amblyomma maculatum; Ctrl, no infestation.
Figure 2 Anaphylaxis in tick infested mice following post-oral challenge with 400 mg of cooked pork kidney homogenates. Body temperature was recorded at baseline and post-oral challenge and a drop in body temperature >3 was considered as a sign of severe anaphylaxis. The two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test was performed for statistical significance; *** P<0.001; **** P<0.0001. Aa, Amblyomma americanum; Am, Amblyomma maculatum; Ctrl, no infestation.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Repeated sensitization of AGKO mice via nymph tick bite and analysis of tick engorgement (A) Engorgement weight of Amblyomma americanum nymph tick recovered during different stage of sensitization of AGKO mice (N=5). (B) Engorgement weight of Amblyomma maculatum nymph tick recovered during different stage of sensitization of AGTKO mice (N=5). Statistical test-students t-test. **, p<0.01, ns not significant.
Figure 3 Repeated sensitization of AGKO mice via nymph tick bite and analysis of tick engorgement (A) Engorgement weight of Amblyomma americanum nymph tick recovered during different stage of sensitization of AGKO mice (N=5). (B) Engorgement weight of Amblyomma maculatum nymph tick recovered during different stage of sensitization of AGTKO mice (N=5). Statistical test-students t-test. **, p<0.01, ns not significant.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Differential gene transcription in biopsy site at tick attachment. (A) Sample correlation heatmap. (B) Volcano plot with dotted line displays mean gene expression fold change ≥ 2.0 and ≤ -2.0 between tick-infested mice and control infestation. The dashed red line shows where adjusted p value = 0.01. (C) Heat map of genes displaying two-fold change and p-Adjusted value ≥0.01. The legend displays mapping to row-wise Z-scores. Aa, Amblyomma americanum; 1S, first sensitization; 2S, second sensitization; 3S, third sensitization; TR1-TR6, Aa infested mice; CR1-CR6, non-infested mice.
Figure 4 Differential gene transcription in biopsy site at tick attachment. (A) Sample correlation heatmap. (B) Volcano plot with dotted line displays mean gene expression fold change ≥ 2.0 and ≤ -2.0 between tick-infested mice and control infestation. The dashed red line shows where adjusted p value = 0.01. (C) Heat map of genes displaying two-fold change and p-Adjusted value ≥0.01. The legend displays mapping to row-wise Z-scores. Aa, Amblyomma americanum; 1S, first sensitization; 2S, second sensitization; 3S, third sensitization; TR1-TR6, Aa infested mice; CR1-CR6, non-infested mice.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Heat map representation of differentially transcribed genes involved in cell migration and recruitment of leucocytes to tick-infestation sites. (A) Cell population present on site of tick attachment based on gene characteristics determined by NanoString cell type profiler. (B) Chemokine and chemokine receptors, (C) Cell adhesion, vascular permeability and leucocyte migration. (D) Plasminogen and complement activation. Aa, Amblyomma americanum; 1S, first sensitization; 2S, second sensitization; 3S, third sensitization.
Figure 5 Heat map representation of differentially transcribed genes involved in cell migration and recruitment of leucocytes to tick-infestation sites. (A) Cell population present on site of tick attachment based on gene characteristics determined by NanoString cell type profiler. (B) Chemokine and chemokine receptors, (C) Cell adhesion, vascular permeability and leucocyte migration. (D) Plasminogen and complement activation. Aa, Amblyomma americanum; 1S, first sensitization; 2S, second sensitization; 3S, third sensitization.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Heat map representation of differentially transcribed genes involved in inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses. (A) Cytokines and cytokine receptors. (B) Pattern recognizing receptor (PRR), toll-like receptor (TLR) and inflammasome activation. (C) MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathway. (D) Interferon and antiviral responses. (E) JAK-STAT signaling pathway. (F) Other inflammatory response genes.
Figure 6 Heat map representation of differentially transcribed genes involved in inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses. (A) Cytokines and cytokine receptors. (B) Pattern recognizing receptor (PRR), toll-like receptor (TLR) and inflammasome activation. (C) MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathway. (D) Interferon and antiviral responses. (E) JAK-STAT signaling pathway. (F) Other inflammatory response genes.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Modulation of genes involved in antigen presentation and Th1 response. (A) Heat map showing representation of differentially transcribed genes involved in antigen presentation. (B, C) Dot plots showing transcript counts of Treg transcription factor Foxp3 and Th1 transcription factor Tbx21. Each dot represents an individual mouse. The dotted line shows the limit of detection.
Figure 7 Modulation of genes involved in antigen presentation and Th1 response. (A) Heat map showing representation of differentially transcribed genes involved in antigen presentation. (B, C) Dot plots showing transcript counts of Treg transcription factor Foxp3 and Th1 transcription factor Tbx21. Each dot represents an individual mouse. The dotted line shows the limit of detection.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 Modulation of genes involved in B cell signaling and Th2 response. Heat map showing representation of differentially transcribed genes involved in B cell signaling and Th2 response (A). Dot plot showing differential transcription of cytokine IL-4 and its receptor (B, C), cytokine IL-21 and its receptor (D, E), cytokine IL-13 receptor (F) and ER stress response factor XBP-1 (G). Each dot represents an individual mouse. The dotted line shows the limit of detection.
Figure 8 Modulation of genes involved in B cell signaling and Th2 response. Heat map showing representation of differentially transcribed genes involved in B cell signaling and Th2 response (A). Dot plot showing differential transcription of cytokine IL-4 and its receptor (B, C), cytokine IL-21 and its receptor (D, E), cytokine IL-13 receptor (F) and ER stress response factor XBP-1 (G). Each dot represents an individual mouse. The dotted line shows the limit of detection.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. Macher, 2008, The Galalpha1,3Galbeta1,4GlcNAc-R (alpha-Gal) epitope: a carbohydrate of unique evolution and clinical relevance, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1780, 75, 10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Commins, 2009, Delayed anaphylaxis, angioedema, or urticaria after consumption of red meat in patients with IgE antibodies specific for galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 123, 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.10.052 · DOI
  3. Galili, 1999, α-gal and anti-gal, α1,3-galactosyltransferase, α-gal epitopes, and the natural anti-gal antibody subcellular biochemistry, 10.1007/978-1-4615-4771-6 · DOI
  4. Apostolovic, 2014, Immunoproteomics of processed beef proteins reveal novel galactose-α-1,3-galactose-containing allergens, Allergy, 69, 10.1111/all.12462 · DOI
  5. Takahashi, 2014, Laminin γ-1 and collagen α-1 (VI) chain are galactose-α-1,3-galactose-bound allergens in beef, Allergy, 69, 199, 10.1111/all.12302 · DOI
  6. Iweala, 2020, Glycolipid-mediated basophil activation in alpha-gal allergy, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 146, 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.02.006 · DOI
  7. Hilger, 2016, Two galactose-α-1,3-galactose carrying peptidases from pork kidney mediate anaphylactogenic responses in delayed meat allergy, Allergy, 71, 10.1111/all.12835 · DOI
  8. Commins, 2014, Delayed clinical and ex vivo response to mammalian meat in patients with IgE to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 134, 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.024 · DOI
  9. Sharma, 2021, Tick saliva and the alpha-gal syndrome: finding a needle in a haystack, Front Cell infection Microbiol, 11, 10.3389/fcimb.2021.680264 · DOI
  10. Galili, 1999, Evolution of alpha 1,3galactosyltransferase and of the alpha-Gal epitope, Sub-cellular Biochem, 32, 1, 10.1007/978-1-4615-4771-6_1 · DOI
  11. Galili, 2005, The alpha-gal epitope and the anti-Gal antibody in xenotransplantation and in cancer immunotherapy, Immunol Cell Biol, 83, 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2005.01366.x · DOI
  12. Galili, 1993, One percent of human circulating B lymphocytes are capable of producing the natural anti-Gal antibody, Blood, 82, 10.1182/blood.V82.8.2485.2485 · DOI
  13. Fischer, 2014, Galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose sensitization is a prerequisite for pork-kidney allergy and cofactor-related mammalian meat anaphylaxis, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 134, 755, 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.051 · DOI
  14. Hamanova, 2015, Anti-Gal IgM, IgA and IgG natural antibodies in childhood, Immunol Lett, 164, 10.1016/j.imlet.2015.02.001 · DOI
  15. Hilger, 2019, Role and mechanism of galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose in the elicitation of delayed anaphylactic reactions to red meat, Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, 19, 10.1007/s11882-019-0835-9 · DOI
  16. Berg, 2014, Drug allergens and food–the cetuximab and galactose-α-1,3-galactose story, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 112, 97, 10.1016/j.anai.2013.11.014 · DOI
  17. Roseman, 2001, Reflections on glycobiology, J Biol Chem, 276, 10.1074/jbc.R100053200 · DOI
  18. Chmelař, 2016, All for one and one for all on the tick-host battlefield, Trends Parasitol, 32, 10.1016/j.pt.2016.01.004 · DOI
  19. Bullard, 2019, Repurposing of glycine-rich proteins in abiotic and biotic stresses in the lone-star tick (Amblyomma americanum), Front Physiol, 10, 10.3389/fphys.2019.00744 · DOI
  20. Adegoke, 2020, Tick-borne pathogens shape the native microbiome within tick vectors, Microorganisms, 8, 10.3390/microorganisms8091299 · DOI
  21. Commins, 2011, The relevance of tick bites to the production of IgE antibodies to the mammalian oligosaccharide galactose-α-1,3-galactose, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 127, 1286, 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.02.019 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hamsten, 2013, Identification of galactose-α-1,3-galactose in the gastrointestinal tract of the tick Ixodes ricinus; possible relationship with red meat allergy, Allergy, 68, 10.1111/all.12128 · DOI
  23. Araujo, 2016, Amblyomma sculptum tick saliva: α-Gal identification, antibody response and possible association with red meat allergy in Brazil, Int J Parasitol, 46, 10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.12.005 · DOI
  24. van Nunen, 2015, Tick-induced allergies: mammalian meat allergy, tick anaphylaxis and their significance, Asia Pac Allergy, 5, 3, 10.5415/apallergy.2015.5.1.3 · DOI
  25. Thompson, 2023, Geographic distribution of suspected alpha-gal syndrome cases - United States, january 2017-december 2022, MMWR. Morbidity mortality weekly Rep, 72, 10.15585/mmwr.mm7230a2 · DOI
  26. Binder, 2021, Diagnostic testing for galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose, United States 2010 to 2018, Ann allergy Asthma immunology: Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol, 126, 411, 10.1016/j.anai.2020.12.019 · DOI
  27. Monzón, 2016, Population and evolutionary genomics of amblyomma americanum, an expanding arthropod disease vector, Genome Biol Evol, 8, 10.1093/gbe/evw080 · DOI
  28. Raghavan, 2019, Current and future distribution of the lone star tick, amblyomma americanum (L.) (Acari: ixodidae) in North America, PloS One, 14, 10.1371/journal.pone.0209082 · DOI
  29. Crispell, 2019, Discovery of alpha-gal-containing antigens in north american tick species believed to induce red meat allergy, Front Immunol, 10, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01056 · DOI
  30. Choudhary, 2021, Tick salivary gland extract induces alpha-gal syndrome in alpha-gal deficient mice, Immun. Inflamm Dis, 9, 10.1002/iid3.457 · DOI
  31. Commins, 2013, Delayed anaphylaxis to red meat in patients with IgE specific for galactose alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal), Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, 13, 10.1007/s11882-012-0315-y · DOI
  32. Hashizume, 2018, Repeated Amblyomma testudinarium tick bites are associated with increased galactose-α-1,3-galactose carbohydrate IgE antibody levels: A retrospective cohort study in a single institution, J Am Acad Dermatol, 78, 1135, 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.028 · DOI
  33. Kim, 2020, IgE to galactose-α-1,3-galactose wanes over time in patients who avoid tick bites, J Allergy Clin Immunol In Pract, 8, 364, 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.08.045 · DOI
  34. Kersh, 2023, Tick bite as a risk factor for alpha-gal-specific immunoglobulin E antibodies and development of alpha-gal syndrome, Ann allergy Asthma immunology: Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol, 130, 10.1016/j.anai.2022.11.021 · DOI
  35. Patrick, 1975, Laboratory rearing procedures and equipment for multi-host ticks (Acarina: Ixodidae), J Med Entomol, 12, 10.1093/jmedent/12.3.389 · DOI
  36. Tearle, 1996, The alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout mouse. Implications for xenotransplantation, Transplantation, 61, 10.1097/00007890-199601150-00004 · DOI
  37. Wilson, 2021, A dynamic relationship between two regional causes of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis: α-Gal syndrome and imported fire ant, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 147, 643, 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.034 · DOI
  38. Snapper, 1987, Interferon-gamma and B cell stimulatory factor-1 reciprocally regulate Ig isotype production, Sci (New York N.Y.), 236, 10.1126/science.3107127 · DOI
  39. Finkelman, 2007, Anaphylaxis: lessons from mouse models, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 120, 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.07.033 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Orgel, 2019, Genetic diversity between mouse strains allows identification of the CC027/GeniUnc strain as an orally reactive model of peanut allergy, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 143, 1027, 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.10.009 · DOI
  41. Wright, 1990, CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein, Sci (New York N.Y.), 249, 10.1126/science.1698311 · DOI
  42. Kawasaki, 2014, Toll-like receptor signaling pathways, Front Immunol, 5, 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00461 · DOI
  43. Rühl, 2015, Caspase-11 activates a canonical NLRP3 inflammasome by promoting K(+) efflux, Eur J Immunol, 45, 10.1002/eji.201545772 · DOI
  44. Wagner, 2009, Evaluation of Nod-like receptor (NLR) effector domain interactions, PloS One, 4, e4931, 10.1371/journal.pone.0004931 · DOI
  45. Rutz, 2014, The IL-20 subfamily of cytokines–from host defence to tissue homeostasis, Nat Rev Immunol, 14, 10.1038/nri3766 · DOI
  46. Yánez, 2020, The IFITM protein family in adaptive immunity, Immunology, 159, 10.1111/imm.13163 · DOI
  47. Tangye, 2023, Cytokine-mediated STAT-dependent pathways underpinning human B-cell differentiation and function, Curr Opin Immunol, 81, 10.1016/j.coi.2023.102286 · DOI
  48. Boulay, 1990, The human N-formylpeptide receptor. Characterization of two cDNA isolates and evidence for a new subfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors, Biochemistry, 29, 10.1021/bi00502a016 · DOI
  49. Sarrias, 2007, CD6 binds to pathogen-associated molecular patterns and protects from LPS-induced septic shock, Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America, 104, 10.1073/pnas.0702815104 · DOI
  50. He, 1998, RORgamma t, a novel isoform of an orphan receptor, negatively regulates Fas ligand expression and IL-2 production in T cells, Immunity, 9, 797, 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80645-7 · DOI
  51. Ono, 2007, Foxp3 controls regulatory T-cell function by interacting with AML1/Runx1, Nature, 446, 10.1038/nature05673 · DOI
  52. Szabo, 2000, A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment, Cell, 100, 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80702-3 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Angel, 2009, Distinctive localization of antigen-presenting cells in human lymph nodes, Blood, 113, 10.1182/blood-2008-06-165266 · DOI
  54. Baranov, 2019, The phosphoinositide kinase PIKfyve promotes cathepsin-S-mediated major histocompatibility complex class II antigen presentation, iScience, 11, 10.1016/j.isci.2018.12.015 · DOI
  55. Cannons, 2010, Optimal germinal center responses require a multistage t cell:B cell adhesion process involving integrins, SLAM-associated protein, and CD84, Immunity, 32, 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.01.010 · DOI
  56. Eto, 2011, IL-21 and IL-6 are critical for different aspects of B cell immunity and redundantly induce optimal follicular helper CD4 T cell (Tfh) differentiation, PloS One, 6, 10.1371/journal.pone.0017739 · DOI
  57. Dienz, 2009, The induction of antibody production by IL-6 is indirectly mediated by IL-21 produced by CD4+ t cells, J Exp Med, 206, 69, 10.1084/jem.20081571 · DOI
  58. Coffman, 1986, B cell stimulatory factor-1 enhances the IgE response of lipopolysaccharide-activated B cells, J Immunol (Baltimore Md.: 1950), 136, 10.4049/jimmunol.136.12.4538 · DOI
  59. DeFrance, 1994, Interleukin 13 is a B cell stimulating factor, J Exp Med, 179, 10.1084/jem.179.1.135 · DOI
  60. Schmitz, 2005, IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines, Immunity, 23, 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.09.015 · DOI
  61. Ho, 1998, c-maf promotes T helper cell type 2 (Th2) and attenuates Th1 differentiation by both interleukin 4-dependent and -independent mechanisms, J Exp Med, 188, 10.1084/jem.188.10.1859 · DOI
  62. Troutman, 2012, Role for B-cell adapter for PI3K (BCAP) as a signaling adapter linking Toll-like receptors (TLRs) to serine/threonine kinases PI3K/Akt, Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America, 109, 10.1073/pnas.1118579109 · DOI
  63. Avery, 2018, Germline-activating mutations in PIK3CD compromise B cell development and function, J Exp Med, 215, 10.1084/jem.20180010 · DOI
  64. So, 2018, Roles of endoplasmic reticulum stress in immune responses, Molecules Cells, 41, 10.14348/molcells.2018.0241 · DOI
  65. Commins, 2020, Diagnosis & Management of alpha-gal syndrome: lessons from 2,500 patients. Expert rev, Clin Immunol, 16, 10.1080/1744666X.2020.1782745 · DOI
  66. Van Nunen, 2009, An association between tick bite reactions and red meat allergy in humans, Med J Aust, 190, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02533.x · DOI
  67. Chandrasekhar, 2019, Cutaneous exposure to clinically relevant lone star ticks promotes igE production and hypersensitivity through CD4+ T cell- and myD88-dependent pathways in mice, J Immunol (Baltimore Md.: 1950), 203, 10.4049/jimmunol.1801156 · DOI
  68. Park, 2020, Alpha-gal and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in the n-glycans of salivary glands in the lone star tick, amblyomma americanum, Vaccines, 8, 10.3390/vaccines8010018 · DOI
  69. Joral, 2022, The quantification of igG specific to α-gal could be used as a risk marker for suffering mammalian meat allergy, Foods, 11, 10.3390/foods11030466 · DOI
  70. Kotál, 2015, Modulation of host immunity by tick saliva, J Proteomics, 128, 58, 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.07.005 · DOI
  71. Cabezas-Cruz, 2017, Salivary prostaglandin E2: role in tick-induced allergy to red meat, Trends Parasitol, 33, 10.1016/j.pt.2017.03.004 · DOI
  72. Carvalho-Costa, 2015, Immunosuppressive effects of amblyomma cajennense tick saliva on murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, Parasit Vectors, 8, 22, 10.1186/s13071-015-0634-7 · DOI
  73. Van Kaer, 2018, Therapeutic potential of invariant natural killer T cells in autoimmunity, Front Immunol, 9, 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00519 · DOI
  74. Karim, 2011, A deep insight into the sialotranscriptome of the gulf coast tick, amblyomma maculatum, PloS One, 6, 10.1371/journal.pone.0028 · DOI
  75. Wolf, 2016, Hexokinase is an innate immune receptor for the detection of bacterial peptidoglycan, Cell, 166, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.076 · DOI
  76. Tanaka, 2014, IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease, Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol, 6, 10.1101/cshperspect.a016295 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Heinze, 2012, Transcriptional profiling of the murine cutaneous response during initial and subsequent infestations with Ixodes scapularis nymphs, Parasites Vectors, 5, 10.1186/1756-3305-5-26 · DOI
  78. Malandain, 2005, IgE-reactive carbohydrate epitopes–classification, cross-reactivity, and clinical impact, Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol, 37
  79. Sánchez-Fueyo, 2003, Tim-3 inhibits T helper type 1-mediated auto- and alloimmune responses and promotes immunological tolerance, Nat Immunol, 4, 10.1038/ni987 · DOI
  80. Gautron, 2014, Enhanced suppressor function of TIM-3+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, Eur J Immunol, 44, 10.1002/eji.201344392 · DOI
  81. Kosaka, 1994, Characterization of the human gene (PTGS2) encoding prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2, Eur J Biochem, 221, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18804.x · DOI
  82. Jose, 1981, Bradykinin-stimulated prostaglandin E2 production by endothelial cells and its modulation by antiinflammatory compounds, Inflammation, 5, 10.1007/BF00911100 · DOI
  83. Qian, 1997, A specific prostaglandin E2 receptor and its role in modulating salivary secretion in the female tick, Amblyomma americanum (L.), Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 27, 10.1016/s0965-1748(97)00010-6 · DOI
  84. Poole, 2013, Prostaglandin E(2) in tick saliva regulates macrophage cell migration and cytokine profile, Parasites Vectors, 6, 10.1186/1756-3305-6-261 · DOI
  85. Li, 2013, Regulation of T helper cell subsets by cyclooxygenases and their metabolites, Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat, 74, 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2012.11.002 · DOI
  86. Ouyang, 2011, Regulation and functions of the IL-10 family of cytokines in inflammation and disease, Annu Rev Immunol, 29, 71, 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101312 · DOI
  87. Wang, 2019, Lipocalin 2 protects against escherichia coli infection by modulating neutrophil and macrophage function, Front Immunol, 10, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02594 · DOI
  88. Behnsen, 2014, The cytokine IL-22 promotes pathogen colonization by suppressing related commensal bacteria, Immunity, 40, 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.01.003 · DOI
  89. Myles, 2013, Signaling via the IL-20 receptor inhibits cutaneous production of IL-1β and IL-17A to promote infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Nat Immunol, 14, 10.1038/ni.2637 · DOI
  90. Kitsou, 2021, Tick host immunity: vector immunomodulation and acquired tick resistance, Trends Immunol, 42, 10.1016/j.it.2021.05.005 · DOI
  91. Allen, 1979, The location of tick salivary antigens, complement and immunoglobulin in the skin of Guinea-pigs infested with Dermacentor andersoni larvae, Immunology, 38
  92. Yoshikawa, 2021, The role of basophils in acquired protective immunity to tick infestation, Parasite Immunol, 43, 10.1111/pim.12804 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sharma, S. R., Choudhary, S. K., Vorobiov, J., Commins, S. P., & Karim, S.
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2024-02-08
Volume
14
ISSN
1664-3224
DOI
10.3389/fimmu.2023.1336883
PMC
PMC10882631
Cited by
23
References
2
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review