Cited by 44Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMarine and coastal ecosystemsMarine and fisheries research

Propagation of the 2014–2016 Northeast Pacific Marine Heatwave Through the Salish Sea

Open access
Khangaonkar, Tarang, Nugraha, Adi, Yun, Su Kyong, Premathilake, Lakshitha, Keister, Julie E., Bos, Julia·2021·Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract

Effects and impacts of the Northeast Pacific marine heatwave of 2014–2016 on the inner coastal estuarine waters of the Salish Sea were examined using a combination of monitoring data and an established three-dimensional hydrodynamic and biogeochemical model of the region. The anomalous high temperatures reached the U.S. Pacific Northwest continental shelf toward the end of 2014 and primarily entered the Salish Sea waters through an existing strong estuarine exchange. Elevated temperatures up to + 2.3°C were observed at the monitoring stations throughout 2015 and 2016 relative to 2013 before dissipating in 2017. The hydrodynamic and biogeochemical responses to this circulating high-temperature event were examined using the Salish Sea Model over a 5-year window from 2013 to 2017. Responses of conventional water-quality indicator variables, such as temperature and salinity, nutrients and phytoplankton, zooplankton, dissolved oxygen, and pH, were evaluated relative to a baseline without the marine heatwave forcing. The simulation results relative to 2014 show an increase in biological activity (+14%, and 6% Δ phytoplankton biomass, respectively) during the peak heatwave year 2015 and 2016 propagating toward higher zooplankton biomass (+14%, +18% Δ mesozooplankton biomass). However, sensitivity tests show that this increase was a direct result of higher freshwater and associated nutrient loads accompanied by stronger estuarine exchange with the Pacific Ocean rather than warming due to the heatwave. Strong vertical circulation and mixing provided mitigation with only ≈+0.6°C domain-wide annual average temperature increase within Salish Sea, and served as a physical buffer to keep waters cooler relative to the continental shelf during the marine heatwave.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmars.2021.787604

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The start of the Pacific Coast Feeding Group abundance decline preceded the current eastern breeding stock episodic mortality event and may show the Pacific Coast Feeding Group response to the 2014-2016 marine heatwave.

    “The start of this decline in PCFG abundance preceded the current EME of EBS gray whales and may show the PCFG response to the 2014-2016 marine heatwave (Peterson et al., 2017;Khangaonkar et al., 2021;Maniscalco, 2023).”

    From Update on the status of gray whales since the 2020 Implementation Review (2024) · cites this paper as Khangaonkar et al., 2021

    The Introduction describes the 2014–2016 marine heatwave and reports effects on parts of the food web. It does not discuss Pacific Coast Feeding Group abundance, eastern breeding stock gray-whale mortality, or the timing of a whale decline relative to that mortality event. Its ecological findings therefore do not establish the proposed whale response. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khangaonkar, T., Nugraha, A., Yun, S. K., Premathilake, L., Keister, J. E., & Bos, J.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Washington Tacoma (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Washington State Department of Ecology (US)
Corresponding author
Khangaonkar, Tarang
Venue
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2021-12-07
Volume
8
ISSN
2296-7745 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200020759
Cited by
44
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Marine Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Washington State University
  • University of Washington
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
marine heatwaves, Salish Sea, estuarine exchange, phytoplankton biomass, zooplankton biomass, nutrient loading, freshwater discharge, vertical mixing, dissolved oxygen, pH, water quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review