Cited by 347Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesClimate variability and modelsMarine and fisheries research

Satellite sea surface temperatures along the West Coast of the United States during the 2014–2016 northeast Pacific marine heat wave

Gentemann, Chelle L., Fewings, Melanie R., García‐Reyes, Marisol·2017·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

From January 2014 to August 2016, sea surface temperatures (SSTs) along the Washington, Oregon, and California coasts were significantly warmer than usual, reaching a maximum SST anomaly of 6.2°C off Southern California. This marine heat wave occurred alongside the Gulf of Alaska marine heat wave and resulted in major disturbances in the California Current ecosystem and massive economic impacts. Here we use satellite and blended reanalysis products to report the magnitude, extent, duration, and evolution of SSTs and wind stress anomalies along the West Coast of the continental United States during this event. Nearshore SST anomalies along the entire coast were persistent during the marine heat wave, and only abated seasonally, during spring upwelling‐favorable wind stress. The coastal marine heat wave weakened in July 2016 and disappeared by September 2016.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2016gl071039

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The warm anomaly maximum was observed in the offshore northerly region and along the west coast of the USA.

    “The warm anomaly maximum was observed in the offshore northerly region and along the west coast of the USA49.”
  • The areas with the strongest warming trends during 2010-2018 are the North and East Pacific, the trend being driven by the warm anomalies observed here between 2014-2016.

    “The areas with the strongest warming trends during 2010–2018 are the North and East Pacific, the trend being driven by the warm anomalies observed here between 2014–201632,49.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gentemann, C. L., Fewings, M. R., & García‐Reyes, M.
Affiliations
  • Earth and Space Research (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Farallon Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Gentemann, Chelle L.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2017-01-12
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
312-319
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2559856220
Cited by
347
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 10
FWCI
16.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Oklahoma Space Grant Consortium (NNH15C077C, NNH13CH09C)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
marine heatwaves, sea surface temperature anomalies, Northeast Pacific, California Current, wind stress anomalies, upwelling, Washington coast, Oregon coast, California coast, satellite SST

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review