The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More Is Better: Selecting for Broad Host Range Bacteriophages
Open accessAbstract
Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria. In this perspective, we discuss several aspects of a characteristic feature of bacteriophages, their host range. Each phage has its own particular host range, the range of bacteria that it can infect. While some phages can only infect one or a few bacterial strains, other phages can infect many species or even bacteria from different genera. Different methods for determining host range may give different results, reflecting the multiple mechanisms bacteria have to resist phage infection and reflecting the different steps of infection each method depends on. This makes defining host range difficult. Another difficulty in describing host range arises from the inconsistent use of the words "narrow" and especially "broad" when describing the breadth of the host range. Nearly all bacteriophages have been isolated using a single host strain of bacteria. While this procedure is fairly standard, it may more likely produce narrow rather than broad host range phage. Our results and those of others suggest that using multiple host strains during isolation can more reliably produce broader host range phages. This challenges the common belief that most bacteriophages have a narrow host range. We highlight the implications of this for several areas that are affected by host range including horizontal gene transfer and phage therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marine viruses — major players in the global ecosystem
Suttle, C. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1750 · Cited by 3,157
Virioplankton: Viruses in Aquatic Ecosystems
Wommack, K. E., & Colwell, R. R. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.1.69-114.2000 · Cited by 2,160
Adams, M. H. (1959) · Interscience Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.6966 · Cited by 2,097
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
Phages and the Evolution of Bacterial Pathogens: from Genomic Rearrangements to Lysogenic Conversion
Brüssow, H., Canchaya, C., & Hardt, W.-D. (2004) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.68.3.560-602.2004 · Cited by 1,725
Pros and cons of phage therapy
Loc-Carrillo, C., & Abedon, S. T. (2011) · Bacteriophage · doi:10.4161/bact.1.2.14590 · Cited by 1,020
Bacteriophage Host Range and Bacterial Resistance
Hyman, P., & Abedon, S. T. (2010) · Advances in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2164(10)70007-1 · Cited by 819
Self-citationRevenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences
Samson, J. E., Magadán, A. H., Sabri, M., & Moineau, S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3096 · Cited by 698
Importance of prophages to evolution and virulence of bacterial pathogens
Fortier, L.-C., & Sekulovic, O. (2013) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.24498 · Cited by 577
The phage‐host arms race: Shaping the evolution of microbes
Stern, A., & Sorek, R. (2011) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201000071 · Cited by 527
Cited by
Role of the gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes and related diseases
Yang, G., Wei, J., Liu, P., Zhang, Q., Tian, Y., Hou, G., Meng, L., Xin, Y., & Jiang, X. (2021) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154712 · Cited by 418
Kent, A. G., Vill, A. C., Shi, Q., Satlin, M. J., & Brito, I. L. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18164-7 · Cited by 216
Unifying the known and unknown microbial coding sequence space
Vanni, C., Schechter, M. S., Acinas, S. G., Barberán, A., Buttigieg, P. L., Casamayor, E. O., Delmont, T. O., Duarte, C. M., Eren, A. M., Finn, R. D., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.67667 · Cited by 134
Promises of microbiome-based therapies
Bajaj, J. S., Ng, S. C., & Schnabl, B. (2022) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.003 · Cited by 119
Genetically Engineered Microorganisms and Their Impact on Human Health
Mahdizade Ari, M., Dadgar, L., Elahi, Z., Ghanavati, R., & Taheri, B. (2024) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1155/2024/6638269 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, A., Ward, S., & Hyman, P.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-09-08
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 1352-1352
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2515956436
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: More Is Better: Selecting for Broad Host Range Bacteriophages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01352
- The paper
- Ross, A., Ward, S., & Hyman, P. (2016). More Is Better: Selecting for Broad Host Range Bacteriophages. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01352
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.