The DOI matches its Crossref record; 243 of the 243 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update
Open accessAbstract
Fish intestinal mucosal surfaces comprise of a complex and dynamic community of microorganisms, which play important roles within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Of the bacteria colonising the GI tract, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), are generally considered as favourable bacteria due to their abilities to stimulating host GI development, digestive function, maintaining mucosal tolerance, stimulating immune response and provide protection towards bacterial pathogens. In early finfish studies culture-dependent methods were used to enumerate bacterial population levels within the GI tract; members of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Carnobacterium genera were isolated. However, due to limitations by using culture media, techniques such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis (TTGE), 16S rRNA clone libraries, and MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA genes have been used during the last decade. These investigations have revealed the presence of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Carnobacterium, Weissella and Pediococcus as indigenous species. In the GI tract of warm water fish species, members of the genera Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Enterococcus, Weissella and Pediococcus have commonly been identified, however, Carnobacterium are rarely identified. Numerous strains of LAB isolated from finfish are capable of producing antibacterial substances against different potential fish pathogenic bacteria as well as human pathogens. In addition, many LAB have the ability to inhibit growth of closely related bacteria including strains of carnobacteria, lactobacilli, lactococci, leuconostoc and pediococci. LAB are revealed be the most promising bacterial genera as probiotic in aquaculture. During the decade increasing number of research attempts are performed on evaluation of probiotic properties of different genus and species of LAB. Except limited contradictory reports, most of administered strains showed beneficial effects on growth performance, reproductive performance, immune responses and disease resistance of finfish. This eventually led to industrial scale up and introduction LAB-based commercial probiotics. Pathogenic LAB such as members of the genera Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Carnobacterium and Lactococcus have been detected from ascites, kidney, liver, heart and spleen of several finfish species. These pathogenic bacteria will be addressed in present review which includes their impacts on finfish aquaculture, possible routes for treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dietary Modulation of the Human Colonic Microbiota: Introducing the Concept of Prebiotics
Gibson, G. R., & Roberfroid, M. B. (1995) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/125.6.1401 · Cited by 7,667
The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease
Round, J. L., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2009) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2515 · Cited by 5,029
The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: Time for reassessment
Martinez, F. O., & Gordon, S. (2014) · F1000Prime Reports · doi:10.12703/p6-13 · Cited by 4,689
Bacteriocins: Developing innate immunity for food
Cotter, P. D., Hill, C., & Ross, R. P. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1273 · Cited by 2,380
Cabello, F. C. (2006) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01054.x · Cited by 2,329
Probiotic Bacteria as Biological Control Agents in Aquaculture
Verschuere, L., Rombaut, G., Sorgeloos, P., & Verstraete, W. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.655-671.2000 · Cited by 2,283
Cytokines and chemokines: At the crossroads of cell signalling and inflammatory disease
Turner, M. D., Nedjai, B., Hurst, T., & Pennington, D. J. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.05.014 · Cited by 2,162
Genetics of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria
Klaenhammer, T. (1993) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/0168-6445(93)90057-g · Cited by 2,029
Bacteriocins—A viable alternative to antibiotics?
Cotter, P. D., Ross, R. P., & Hill, C. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2937 · Cited by 1,793
Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat
Schillinger, U., & L�cke, F. K. (1989) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.55.8.1901-1906.1989 · Cited by 1,330
Cited by
Host-Associated Probiotics: A Key Factor in Sustainable Aquaculture
Van Doan, H., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ringø, E., Ángeles Esteban, M., Dadar, M., Dawood, M. A. O., & Faggio, C. (2020) · Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture · doi:10.1080/23308249.2019.1643288 · Cited by 348
Self-citationUse of probiotics in aquaculture of China—a review of the past decade
Wang, A., Ran, C., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Ding, Q., Yang, Y., Olsen, R. E., Ringø, E., Bindelle, J., & Zhou, Z. (2019) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2018.12.026 · Cited by 346
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ringø, E., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ghosh, K., Doan, H. V., Beck, B. R., & Song, S. K.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-08-10
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 1818-1818
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887898816
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 243
- FWCI
- 12.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01818
- The paper
- Ringø, E., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ghosh, K., Doan, H. V., Beck, B. R., & Song, S. K. (2018). Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01818
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.