Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 434

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 243 of the 243 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update

Open access
Ringø, Einar, Hoseinifar, Seyed Hossein, Ghosh, Koushik, Doan, Hien Van, Beck, Bo Ram, Song, Seong Kyu·2018·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

Fish intestinal mucosal surfaces comprise of a complex and dynamic community of microorganisms, which play important roles within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Of the bacteria colonising the GI tract, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), are generally considered as favourable bacteria due to their abilities to stimulating host GI development, digestive function, maintaining mucosal tolerance, stimulating immune response and provide protection towards bacterial pathogens. In early finfish studies culture-dependent methods were used to enumerate bacterial population levels within the GI tract; members of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Carnobacterium genera were isolated. However, due to limitations by using culture media, techniques such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis (TTGE), 16S rRNA clone libraries, and MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA genes have been used during the last decade. These investigations have revealed the presence of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Carnobacterium, Weissella and Pediococcus as indigenous species. In the GI tract of warm water fish species, members of the genera Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Enterococcus, Weissella and Pediococcus have commonly been identified, however, Carnobacterium are rarely identified. Numerous strains of LAB isolated from finfish are capable of producing antibacterial substances against different potential fish pathogenic bacteria as well as human pathogens. In addition, many LAB have the ability to inhibit growth of closely related bacteria including strains of carnobacteria, lactobacilli, lactococci, leuconostoc and pediococci. LAB are revealed be the most promising bacterial genera as probiotic in aquaculture. During the decade increasing number of research attempts are performed on evaluation of probiotic properties of different genus and species of LAB. Except limited contradictory reports, most of administered strains showed beneficial effects on growth performance, reproductive performance, immune responses and disease resistance of finfish. This eventually led to industrial scale up and introduction LAB-based commercial probiotics. Pathogenic LAB such as members of the genera Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Carnobacterium and Lactococcus have been detected from ascites, kidney, liver, heart and spleen of several finfish species. These pathogenic bacteria will be addressed in present review which includes their impacts on finfish aquaculture, possible routes for treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01818

Cites

243 of 243 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 243 references

Cited by

See all 434

Metadata

Authors
Ringø, E., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ghosh, K., Doan, H. V., Beck, B. R., & Song, S. K.
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2018-08-10
Volume
9
Pages
1818-1818
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887898816
Cited by
434
References
243
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01818
The paper
Ringø, E., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ghosh, K., Doan, H. V., Beck, B. R., & Song, S. K. (2018). Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01818

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.