Cited by 56Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications

AlphaFold Models of Small Proteins Rival the Accuracy of Solution NMR Structures

Open access
Tejero, Roberto, Huang, Yuanpeng Janet, Ramelot, Theresa A., Montelione, Gaetano T.·2022·Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular modeling using deep learning have the potential to revolutionize the field of structural biology. In particular, AlphaFold has been observed to provide models of protein structures with accuracies rivaling medium-resolution X-ray crystal structures, and with excellent atomic coordinate matches to experimental protein NMR and cryo-electron microscopy structures. Here we assess the hypothesis that AlphaFold models of small, relatively rigid proteins have accuracies (based on comparison against experimental data) similar to experimental solution NMR structures. We selected six representative small proteins with structures determined by both NMR and X-ray crystallography, and modeled each of them using AlphaFold. Using several structure validation tools integrated under the Protein Structure Validation Software suite (PSVS), we then assessed how well these models fit to experimental NMR data, including NOESY peak lists (RPF-DP scores), comparisons between predicted rigidity and chemical shift data (ANSURR scores), and 15 N- 1 H residual dipolar coupling data (RDC Q factors) analyzed by software tools integrated in the PSVS suite. Remarkably, the fits to NMR data for the protein structure models predicted with AlphaFold are generally similar, or better, than for the corresponding experimental NMR or X-ray crystal structures. Similar conclusions were reached in comparing AlphaFold2 predictions and NMR structures for three targets from the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP). These results contradict the widely held misperception that AlphaFold cannot accurately model solution NMR structures. They also document the value of PSVS for model vs. data assessment of protein NMR structures, and the potential for using AlphaFold models for guiding analysis of experimental NMR data and more generally in structural biology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmolb.2022.877000

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NMR structural ensembles provide a unique validation metric for AF2 because AF2's training PDB subset excluded NMR data.

    “NMR structural ensembles offer a unique validation metric to assess the accuracy of predicted AlphaFold2 models since AlphaFold2 was trained on a subset of the PDB that excluded NMR data1,27–30”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vaswani A. Shazeer N. Parmar N. Uszkoreit J. Jones L. Gomez A. N. (2017). “ Attention Is All You Need,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Long Beach, California, USA: Curran Associates Inc.).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tejero, R., Huang, Y. J., Ramelot, T. A., & Montelione, G. T.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tejero, Roberto
  • Montelione, Gaetano T.
Venue
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Published
2022-06-13
Volume
9
Pages
877000-877000
ISSN
2296-889X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282840217
Cited by
56
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01-GM120574 R35-GM141818)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Keywords
AlphaFold, AlphaFold2, small proteins, protein structure prediction, NMR solution structure, structural validation, residual dipolar couplings, chemical shift prediction, CASP

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review