The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?
Open accessAbstract
Until recently, it has been thought that under interocular suppression high-level visual processing is strongly inhibited if not abolished. With the development of continuous flash suppression (CFS), a variant of binocular rivalry, this notion has now been challenged by a number of reports showing that even high-level aspects of visual stimuli, such as familiarity, affect the time stimuli need to overcome CFS and emerge into awareness. In this "breaking continuous flash suppression" (b-CFS) paradigm, differential unconscious processing during suppression is inferred when (a) speeded detection responses to initially invisible stimuli differ, and (b) no comparable differences are found in non-rivalrous control conditions supposed to measure non-specific threshold differences between stimuli. The aim of the present study was to critically evaluate these assumptions. In six experiments we compared the detection of upright and inverted faces. We found that not only under CFS, but also in control conditions upright faces were detected faster and more accurately than inverted faces, although the effect was larger during CFS. However, reaction time (RT) distributions indicated critical differences between the CFS and the control condition. When RT distributions were matched, similar effect sizes were obtained in both conditions. Moreover, subjective ratings revealed that CFS and control conditions are not perceptually comparable. These findings cast doubt on the usefulness of non-rivalrous control conditions to rule out non-specific threshold differences as a cause of shorter detection latencies during CFS. Thus, at least in its present form, the b-CFS paradigm cannot provide unequivocal evidence for unconscious processing under interocular suppression. Nevertheless, our findings also demonstrate that the b-CFS paradigm can be fruitfully applied as a highly sensitive device to probe differences between stimuli in their potency to gain access to awareness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring consciousness: relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches
Seth, A. K., Dienes, Z., Cleeremans, A., Overgaard, M., & Pessoa, L. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.008 · Cited by 458 · cited 1×
“For example, there is little consensus on the nature of a direct measure that validly indexes conscious awareness (Cheesman and Merikle, 1986; Draine and Greenwald, 1998; Seth et al., 2008).”
BackgroundJiang, Y., Costello, P., & He, S. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01902.x · Cited by 384
On Wildebeests and Humans: The Preferential Detection of Negative Stimuli
Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01412 · Cited by 324
Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes
Rousselet, G. A., Macé, M. J.-M., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2003) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/3.6.5 · Cited by 215
Eye contact facilitates awareness of faces during interocular suppression
Stein, T., Senju, A., Peelen, M. V., & Sterzer, P. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.008 · Cited by 146 · cited 7×
“THE PRESENT STUDY We focused on the advantage of upright over inverted faces in overcoming CFS as an exemplary and consistent b-CFS finding (Jiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2010a; Stein et al., 2011).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationThe face-detection effect: configuration enhances detection
Purcell, D. G., & Stewart, A. L. (1988) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03208806 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness
Maier, A., Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., Tsuchiya, N., & Keliris, G. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00263 · Cited by 629
Expectations accelerate entry of visual stimuli into awareness
Pinto, Y., van Gaal, S., de Lange, F. P., Lamme, V. A. F., & Seth, A. K. (2015) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/15.8.13 · Cited by 159
The Insula Mediates Access to Awareness of Visual Stimuli Presented Synchronously to the Heartbeat
Salomon, R., Ronchi, R., Dönz, J., Bello-Ruiz, J., Herbelin, B., Martet, R., Faivre, N., Schaller, K., & Blanke, O. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4262-15.2016 · Cited by 178
Continuous flash suppression modulates cortical activity in early visual cortex
Yuval-Greenberg, S., & Heeger, D. J. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4612-12.2013 · Cited by 126
Hedger, N., Gray, K. L. H., Garner, M., & Adams, W. J. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000054 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Stein, T., Hebart, M. N., & Sterzer, P.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 167-167
- ISSN
- 1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159903256
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00167
- The paper
- Stein, T., Hebart, M. N., & Sterzer, P. (2011). Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00167
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.