Cited by 16Neuroscience and Music PerceptionPhonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and Disorders

Language experience during the sensitive period narrows infants’ sensory encoding of lexical tones—Music intervention reverses it

Open access
Zhao, Tian Christina, Llanos, Fernando, Chandrasekaran, Bharath, Kuhl, Patricia K.·2022·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The sensitive period for phonetic learning (6∼12 months), evidenced by improved native speech processing and declined non-native speech processing, represents an early milestone in language acquisition. We examined the extent that sensory encoding of speech is altered by experience during this period by testing two hypotheses: (1) early sensory encoding of non-native speech declines as infants gain native-language experience, and (2) music intervention reverses this decline. We longitudinally measured the frequency-following response (FFR), a robust indicator of early sensory encoding along the auditory pathway, to a Mandarin lexical tone in 7- and 11-months-old monolingual English-learning infants. Infants received either no intervention (language-experience group) or music intervention (music-intervention group) randomly between FFR recordings. The language-experience group exhibited the expected decline in FFR pitch-tracking accuracy to the Mandarin tone, while the music-intervention group did not. Our results support both hypotheses and demonstrate that both language and music experiences alter infants’ speech encoding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2022.941853

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bidelman G. M. Gandour J. T. Krishnan A. (2011). Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23 425– 434. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21362 19925180 · DOI
  2. Delorme A. Makeig S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. J. Neurosci. Methods 134 9– 21. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 15102499 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Skoe E. Krizman J. Anderson S. Kraus N. (2015). Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan. Cereb. Cortex 25 1415– 1426. 10.1093/cercor/bht311 24366906 PMC4428291 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, T. C., Llanos, F., Chandrasekaran, B., & Kuhl, P. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Tian Christina
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2022-07-09
Volume
16
Pages
941853-941853
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294354303
Cited by
16
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R21NS114343)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
sensitive period, lexical tone, Mandarin tones, frequency-following response, non-native speech, music intervention, pitch tracking, language experience, speech perception development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review