The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing Neurocognition via Gamified Experimental Logic: A Novel Approach to Simultaneous Acquisition of Multiple ERPs
Open accessAbstract
The present study describes the development of a neurocognitive paradigm: "Assessing Neurocognition via Gamified Experimental Logic" (ANGEL), for performing the parametric evaluation of multiple neurocognitive functions simultaneously. ANGEL employs an audiovisual sensory motor design for the acquisition of multiple event related potentials (ERPs)-the C1, P50, MMN, N1, N170, P2, N2pc, LRP, P300, and ERN. The ANGEL paradigm allows assessment of 10 neurocognitive variables over the course of three "game" levels of increasing complexity ranging from simple passive observation to complex discrimination and response in the presence of multiple distractors. The paradigm allows assessment of several levels of rapid decision making: speeded up response vs. response-inhibition; responses to easy vs. difficult tasks; responses based on gestalt perception of clear vs. ambiguous stimuli; and finally, responses with set shifting during challenging tasks. The paradigm has been tested using 18 healthy participants from both sexes and the possibilities of varied data analyses have been presented in this paper. The ANGEL approach provides an ecologically valid assessment (as compared to existing tools) that quickly yields a very rich dataset and helps to assess multiple ERPs that can be studied extensively to assess cognitive functions in health and disease conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification"
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011) · Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments · doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040 · Cited by 8,402
Duncan, C. C., Barry, R. J., Connolly, J. F., Fischer, C., Michie, P. T., Näätänen, R., Polich, J., Reinvang, I., & Van Petten, C. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045 · Cited by 1,191
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Arbel, 2014, Error and performance feedback processing by children with Specific Language Impairment-An ERP study, Biol. Psychol., 99, 83, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.02.012 · DOI
- Bigdely-Shamlo, 2013, Measure projection analysis: a probabilistic approach to EEG source comparison and multi-subject inference, Neuroimage, 72, 287, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.040 · DOI
- Caharel, 2013, Early holistic face-like processing of Arcimboldo paintings in the right occipito-temporal cortex: evidence from the N170 ERP component, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 90, 157, 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.024 · DOI
- Cespón, 2013, N2pc is modulated by stimulus-stimulus, but not by stimulus-response incompatibilities, Biol. Psychol., 93, 75, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.01.010 · DOI
- Chen, 2014, Domain-specific suppression of auditory mismatch negativity with transcranial direct current stimulation, Clin. Neurophysiol., 125, 585, 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.08.007 · DOI
- Fu, 2010, Dissociation of visual C1 and P1 components as a function of attentional load: an event-related potential study, Biol. Psychiatry, 85, 171, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.06.008 · DOI
- Hajcak, 2008, Oops!. I did it again: an ERP and behavioral study of double-errors, Brain Cogn., 68, 15, 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.02.118 · DOI
- Kanizsa, 1979, Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception
- Kappenman, 2012, Manipulation of orthogonal neural systems together in electrophysiological recordings: the MONSTER approach to simultaneous assessment of multiple neurocognitive dimensions, Schizophr. Bull., 38, 92, 10.1093/schbul/sbr147 · DOI
- Kelly, 2008, Spatial attention modulates initial afferent activity in human primary visual cortex, Cereb. Cortex, 18, 2629, 10.1093/cercor/bhn022 · DOI
- Lopez-Calderon, 2014, ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 8, 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213 · DOI · Paper page
- Luck, 2012, The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components
- Mooney, 1951, A new closure test, Can. J. Psychol. Can. Psychol., 5, 129, 10.1037/h0083540 · DOI
- Rossion, 2011, ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception, Vision Res., 51, 1297, 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Shaikh, 2013, Effect of DISC1 on the P300 waveform in psychosis, Schizophr. Bull., 39, 161, 10.1093/schbul/sbr101 · DOI
- Smith, 2013, Auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia correlate with P50 gating, Clin. Neurophysiol., 124, 1329, 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.004 · DOI
- Uhlhaas, 2006, Dysfunctional long-range coordination of neural activity during Gestalt perception in schizophrenia, J. Neurosci., 26, 8168, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-06.2006 · DOI · Paper page
- Vainio, 2014, Does gaze cueing produce automatic response activation: a lateralized readiness potential (LRP) study, Neurosci. Lett., 567, 1, 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.03.015 · DOI
- Wang, 2014, Action planning and predictive coding when speaking, Neuroimage, 91, 91, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.003 · DOI
- Willenbockel, 2010, Controlling low-level image properties: the SHINE toolbox, Behav. Res. Methods, 42, 671, 10.3758/BRM.42.3.671 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Role of tau protein in Alzheimer’s disease: The prime pathological player
Muralidar, S., Ambi, S. V., Sekaran, S., Thirumalai, D., & Palaniappan, B. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.327 · Cited by 278
Shoumy, N. J., Ang, L.-M., Seng, K. P., Rahaman, D. M. M., & Zia, T. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.102447 · Cited by 171
Targeting gut microbiome: a novel and potential therapy for autism
Yang, Y., Tian, J., & Yang, B. (2018) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2017.12.027 · Cited by 140
Impaired Wnt Signaling in the Prefrontal Cortex of Alzheimer’s Disease
Folke, J., Pakkenberg, B., & Brudek, T. (2019) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-018-1103-z · Cited by 123
Eating and Mealtime Behaviors in Patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Current Perspectives
Margari, L., Marzulli, L., Gabellone, A., & de Giambattista, C. (2020) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s224779 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Nair, A. K., Sasidharan, A., John, J. P., Mehrotra, S., & Kutty, B. M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-01-29
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2253787383
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Funders
- Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology (SR/CSI/63/2011)
- Indian Council of Medical Research (3/1/3/37/Neuro/2013-NCD-I)
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Neurocognition via Gamified Experimental Logic: A Novel Approach to Simultaneous Acquisition of Multiple ERPs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnins.2016.00001
- The paper
- Nair, A. K., Sasidharan, A., John, J. P., Mehrotra, S., & Kutty, B. M. (2016). Assessing Neurocognition via Gamified Experimental Logic: A Novel Approach to Simultaneous Acquisition of Multiple ERPs. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
