The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Myth of Cultured Meat: A Review
Open accessAbstract
To satisfy the increasing demand for food by the growing human population, cultured meat (also called in vitro, artificial or lab-grown meat) is presented by its advocates as a good alternative for consumers who want to be more responsible but do not wish to change their diet. In terms of technical issues, research is still required to optimize cell culture, for instance in terms of culture medium. Nevertheless, whereas we can produce muscle cells, it is almost impossible to reproduce the diversity of meats derived from various species, breeds and cuts. Although these are not yet known, we speculated on the potential health benefits and drawbacks of cultured meat. It is true that the absence of adjacent digestive organs would suggest that cultured muscle cells may be safer. On the other hand, with this high level of cell multiplication, some dysregulation is likely as happens in cancer cells. Likewise, the control of its nutritional composition is still unclear, especially for micronutrients. Regarding environmental issues, the potential advantages of cultured meat for greenhouse gas emissions are a matter of controversy, although less land will be used compared to livestock. However, more criteria need to be taken into account for a comparison with current meat production. Regarding the market share, cultured meat will have to compete with other meat substitutes, especially plant-based alternatives, with many of these already commercialized, unlike artificial meat. Consumer acceptance will be strongly influenced by the name given to this new product, since consumers tend to reject “in vitro” or “cultured” meat technology. In fact, consumers seem to dislike unnatural food. Ethically, cultured meat aims to use considerably fewer animals than conventional livestock farming, making it attractive to vegetarians and vegans. However, some animals will still have to be reared to harvest cells for the production of in vitro meat. Finally, we discussed in this review the nebulous status of cultured meat from a religious point of view. Indeed, religious authorities are still debating the question of whether in vitro meat is kosher or Halal (e.g. compliant with Jewish or Islamic dietary laws).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31788-4 · Cited by 10,880
Aleksandrowicz, L., Green, R., Joy, E. J. M., Smith, P., & Haines, A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165797 · Cited by 1,037
Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate
Mottet, A., de Haan, C., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., Opio, C., & Gerber, P. (2017) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001 · Cited by 1,034
Environmental impacts of cultured meat production
Tuomisto, H. L., & Teixeira de Mattos, M. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es200130u · Cited by 891
Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review
Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. (2017) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.006 · Cited by 880
Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges and prospects
Post, M. J. (2012) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.008 · Cited by 780
Stephens, N., Di Silvio, L., Dunsford, I., Ellis, M., Glencross, A., & Sexton, A. (2018) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.010 · Cited by 768
Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors
Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.010 · Cited by 656
A Survey of Consumer Perceptions of Plant-Based and Clean Meat in the USA, India, and China
Bryant, C., Szejda, K., Parekh, N., Deshpande, V., & Tse, B. (2019) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00011 · Cited by 529
Meat alternatives: an integrative comparison
van der Weele, C., Feindt, P., Jan van der Goot, A., van Mierlo, B., & van Boekel, M. (2019) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.018 · Cited by 430
Cited by
Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market - a review
Lee, H. J., Yong, H. I., Kim, M., Choi, Y.-S., & Jo, C. (2020) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.20.0419 · Cited by 280
Immortalizing Cells for Human Consumption
Soice, E., & Johnston, J. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222111660 · Cited by 119
Tzachor, A., Smidt-Jensen, A., Ramel, A., & Geirsdóttir, M. (2022) · Marine Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10126-022-10162-8 · Cited by 52
Sustainable Diets for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Management
Mendoza-Vasconez, A. S., Landry, M. J., Crimarco, A., Bladier, C., & Gardner, C. D. (2021) · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11883-021-00929-0 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Chriki, S., & Hocquette, J.-F.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Nutrition
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-02-07
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 7-7
- ISSN
- 2296-861X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3005085005
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 34.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Myth of Cultured Meat: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnut.2020.00007
- The paper
- Chriki, S., & Hocquette, J.-F. (2020). The Myth of Cultured Meat: A Review. Frontiers in Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.