Cited by 81Sarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Quality of Life Following Amputation or Limb Preservation in Patients with Lower Extremity Bone Sarcoma

Open access
Mason, Gary E., Aung, Lele, Gall, Sarah, Meyers, Paul A., Butler, Robert, Krüg, Sarah, Kim, Mimi, Healey, John H. +1 more·2013·Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although functional differences have been described between patients with lower extremity bone sarcoma with amputation and limb-preservation surgery, differences have not clearly been shown between the two groups related to quality of life. The purpose of the study was to determine if there is a difference in overall quality of life in lower extremity bone sarcoma survivors related to whether they had an amputation or a limb-preservation procedure while identifying psychological differences for further evaluation. The main hypothesis was that sparing a person's limb, as opposed to amputating it, would result in a better quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-two long-term survivors of lower extremity bone sarcoma were studied to make a comparison of the overall quality of life, pain assessment, and psychological evaluations in limb preservation and amputation patients. Forty-eight patients with limb preservation and thirty-four patients with amputations were enrolled in the study. Validated psychometric measures including the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ), the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, and visual analog scales were utilized. RESULTS: The overall quality of life of patients with limb preservation was significantly higher than patients with amputation (p-value < 0.01). Significant differences were noted in the categories of material well-being, job satisfiers, and occupational relations. CONCLUSION: The overall quality of life of patients with limb-preservation appears to be better than for those patients with amputation based on the QLQ in patients surviving lower extremity bone sarcoma. Further analysis needs to verify the results and focus on the categories that significantly affect the overall quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2013.00210

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most consistent impairment shown after osteosarcoma surgery is increased oxygen consumption associated with ambulation, reflecting increased effort needed to walk.

    “The most consistent impairment shown is increased oxygen consumption associated with ambulation reflecting the increased effort needed to walk 156 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [156]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mason, G. E., Aung, L., Gall, S., Meyers, P. A., Butler, R., Krüg, S., Kim, M., Healey, J. H., & Gorlick, R.
Affiliations
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Gorlick, Richard
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2013
Volume
3
Pages
210-210
ISSN
2234-943X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973831506
Cited by
81
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
limb-sparing surgery, amputation, quality of life, long-term cancer survivors, pain assessment, psychological well-being, material well-being, job satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review