Cited by 182Cardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCongenital Heart Disease StudiesUltrasound in Clinical Applications

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Ventricular Function—For the Neonatologist and Pediatric Intensivist

Open access
Tissot, Cécile, Singh, Yogen, Sekarski, Nicole·2018·Frontiers in Pediatrics

Abstract

In the neonatal and pediatric intensive care setting, bedside cardiac ultrasound is often used to assess ventricular dimensions and function. Depending upon the underlying disease process, it is necessary to be able to evaluate the systolic and diastolic function of left and or right ventricles. The systolic function of left ventricle is mostly assessed qualitatively on visual inspection "eye-balling" and quantitatively by measuring circumferential fraction shortening or calculating the ejection fraction by Simpson's planimetry. The assessment of left ventricular diastolic function relies essentially on the mitral valve and pulmonary venous Doppler tracings or tissue Doppler evaluation. The right ventricular particular shape and anatomical position does not permit to use the same parameters for measuring systolic function as is used for the LV. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and S' velocity on tissue Doppler imaging are more often used for quantitative assessment of right ventricle systolic function. Several parameters proposed to assess right ventricle systolic function such as fractional area change, 3D echocardiography, speckle tracking, and strain rate are being researched and normal values for children are being established. Diastolic function of right ventricle is evaluated by tricuspid valve and hepatic venous Doppler tracings or on tissue Doppler evaluation. The normal values for children are pretty similar to adults while normal values for the neonates, especially preterm infants, may differ significantly from adult population. The normal values for most of the parameters used to assess cardiac function in term neonates and children have now been established.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fped.2018.00079

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In neonates without shunting, echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output is generally reliable, with values ranging between 150 and 300 mL/kg/min.

    “In neonates without shunting, echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output is generally reliable, with values ranging between 150 and 300 mL/kg/min [53,54].”

    From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [53]

    The “Evaluation of CO and Cardiac Index” section says echocardiographic cardiac-output measurement is fairly reliable even in neonates and is reliable in children without shunts. It gives normal values of 150–400 mL/kg/day for infants and children, not the claimed 150–300 mL/kg/min; no page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tissot, C., Singh, Y., & Sekarski, N.
Affiliations
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Sekarski, Nicole
Venue
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Published
2018-04-04
Volume
6
Pages
79-79
ISSN
2296-2360 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795722279
Cited by
181
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Keywords
ventricular function, neonatal echocardiography, pediatric intensive care, left ventricular systolic function, left ventricular diastolic function, right ventricular systolic function, right ventricular diastolic function, ejection fraction, tissue Doppler imaging, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area change, reference values, preterm infants, neonates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review