The DOI matches its Crossref record; 221 of the 221 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Therapeutic Potential for Bacterial Skin Infections and Wounds
Open accessAbstract
Alarming data about increasing resistance to conventional antibiotics are reported, while at the same time the development of new antibiotics is stagnating. Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are mainly caused by the so called ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) which belong to the most recalcitrant bacteria and are resistant to almost all common antibiotics. S. aureus and P. aeruginosa are the most frequent pathogens isolated from chronic wounds and increasing resistance to topical antibiotics has become a major issue. Therefore, new treatment options are urgently needed. In recent years, research focused on the development of synthetic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) with lower toxicity and improved activity compared to their endogenous counterparts. AMPs appear to be promising therapeutic options for the treatment of SSTIs and wounds as they show a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, low resistance rates and display pivotal immunomodulatory as well as wound healing promoting activities such as induction of cell migration and proliferation and angiogenesis. In this review, we evaluate the potential of AMPs for the treatment of bacterial SSTIs and wounds and provide an overview of the mechanisms of actions of AMPs that contribute to combat skin infections and to improve wound healing. Bacteria growing in biofilms are more resistant to conventional antibiotics than their planktonic counterparts due to limited biofilm penetration and distinct metabolic and physiological functions, and often result in chronification of infections and wounds. Thus, we further discuss the feasibility of AMPs as anti-biofilm agents. Finally, we highlight perspectives for future therapies and which issues remain to bring AMPs successfully to the market.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Huang, H.-N., Pan, C., Chan, Y.-L., Chen, J., & Wu, C. (2013) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.02427-13 · Cited by 36
RetractedAntimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?
Brogden, K. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098 · Cited by 5,829
Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & William Costerton, J. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1 · Cited by 4,585
Regulation of Wound Healing by Growth Factors and Cytokines
WERNER, S., & GROSE, R. (2003) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2003.83.3.835 · Cited by 3,629
Jenssen, H., Hamill, P., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00056-05 · Cited by 2,518
Designing antimicrobial peptides: form follows function
Fjell, C. D., Hiss, J. A., Hancock, R. E. W., & Schneider, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3591 · Cited by 2,035
Spellberg, B., Guidos, R., Gilbert, D., Bradley, J., Boucher, H. W., Scheld, W. M., Bartlett, J. G., Edwards, J., & the Infectious Diseases Society of America (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/524891 · Cited by 1,642
Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens
Santajit, S., & Indrawattana, N. (2016) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2016/2475067 · Cited by 1,641
The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases
Gabbiani, G. (2003) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.1427 · Cited by 1,630
The expanding scope of antimicrobial peptide structures and their modes of action
Nguyen, L. T., Haney, E. F., & Vogel, H. J. (2011) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.05.001 · Cited by 1,604
Cited by
Emerging Strategies to Combat ESKAPE Pathogens in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review
Mulani, M. S., Kamble, E. E., Kumkar, S. N., Tawre, M. S., & Pardesi, K. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00539 · Cited by 1,644
Therapeutic strategies for enhancing angiogenesis in wound healing
Veith, A. P., Henderson, K., Spencer, A., Sligar, A. D., & Baker, A. B. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.09.010 · Cited by 1,021
Role of Metabolic Endotoxemia in Systemic Inflammation and Potential Interventions
Mohammad, S., & Thiemermann, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.594150 · Cited by 585
The Immune Functions of Keratinocytes in Skin Wound Healing
Piipponen, M., Li, D., & Landén, N. X. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21228790 · Cited by 503
A New Era of Antibiotics: The Clinical Potential of Antimicrobial Peptides
Browne, K., Chakraborty, S., Chen, R., Willcox, M. D., Black, D. S., Walsh, W. R., & Kumar, N. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21197047 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfalzgraff, A., Brandenburg, K., & Weindl, G.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-03-28
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 281-281
- ISSN
- 1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2795098196
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 221
- FWCI
- 30.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Therapeutic Potential for Bacterial Skin Infections and Wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fphar.2018.00281
- The paper
- Pfalzgraff, A., Brandenburg, K., & Weindl, G. (2018). Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Therapeutic Potential for Bacterial Skin Infections and Wounds. Frontiers in Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.