Cited by 62Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Expert-Augmented computational drug repurposing identified baricitinib as a treatment for COVID-19

Open access
Smith, Daniel P., Oechsle, Olly, Rawling, Michael J., Savory, Ed, Lacoste, Alix M.B., Richardson, Peter John·2021·Frontiers in Pharmacology

Abstract

The onset of the 2019 Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic necessitated the identification of approved drugs to treat the disease, before the development, approval and widespread administration of suitable vaccines. To identify such a drug, we used a visual analytics workflow where computational tools applied over an AI-enhanced biomedical knowledge graph were combined with human expertise. The workflow comprised rapid augmentation of knowledge graph information from recent literature using machine learning (ML) based extraction, with human-guided iterative queries of the graph. Using this workflow, we identified the rheumatoid arthritis drug baricitinib as both an antiviral and anti-inflammatory therapy. The effectiveness of baricitinib was substantiated by the recent publication of the data from the ACTT-2 randomised Phase 3 trial, followed by emergency approval for use by the FDA, and a report from the CoV-BARRIER trial confirming significant reductions in mortality with baricitinib compared to standard of care. Such methods that iteratively combine computational tools with human expertise hold promise for the identification of treatments for rare and neglected diseases and, beyond drug repurposing, in areas of biological research where relevant data may be lacking or hidden in the mass of available biomedical literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphar.2021.709856

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on an in-house drug discovery knowledge graph, BenevolentAI scientists proposed baricitinib, at the time approved for rheumatoid arthritis, as a drug repurposing candidate for severe COVID-19.

    “Based on an in-house drug discovery knowledge graph, BenevolentAI scientists proposed baricitinib, at the time approved for rheumatoid arthritis, as a drug repurposing candidate for severe COVID-19 (52,53).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bouma G. (2009). Normalized (Pointwise) Mutual Information in Collocation Extraction. Editors G. Chiarcos, R. Eckart de Castillo, M Stede, Von der Form zur bedeutung: Texte automatische verarbeiten (From form to meaning: process texts automatically) Proc. GSCL, 31– 40.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, D. P., Oechsle, O., Rawling, M. J., Savory, E., Lacoste, A. M. B., & Richardson, P. J.
Affiliations
BenevolentAI (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Richardson, Peter John
Venue
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2021-07-28
Volume
12
Pages
709856-709856
ISSN
1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3185323030
Cited by
62
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
baricitinib, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, drug repurposing, visual analytics, biomedical knowledge graphs, human-computer collaboration, antiviral therapy, anti-inflammatory therapy, rheumatoid arthritis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review