CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 150Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenome Rearrangement AlgorithmsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Frequency, Origins, and Evolutionary Role of Chromosomal Inversions in Plants

Open access
Huang, Kaichi, Rieseberg, Loren H.·2020·Frontiers in Plant Science
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.00296PMC PMC7093584
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Chromosomal inversions have the potential to play an important role in evolution by reducing recombination between favorable combinations of alleles. Until recently, however, most evidence for their likely importance derived from dipteran flies, whose giant larval salivary chromosomes aided early cytogenetic studies. The widespread application of new genomic technologies has revealed that inversions are ubiquitous across much of the plant and animal kingdoms. Here we review the rapidly accumulating literature on inversions in the plant kingdom and discuss what we have learned about their establishment and likely evolutionary role. We show that inversions are prevalent across a wide range of plant groups. We find that inversions are often associated with locally favored traits, as well as with traits that contribute to assortative mating, suggesting that they may be key to adaptation and speciation in the face of gene flow. We also discuss the role of inversions in sex chromosome formation, and explore possible parallels with inversion establishment on autosomes. The identification of inversion origins, as well as the causal variants within them, will advance our understanding of chromosomal evolution in plants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpls.2020.00296

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This genomic work has uncovered ubiquitous structural variation of all kinds between closely related species, offering a level of resolution that previous cytogenetic and comparative genetic mapping studies could never achieve.

    “This genomic work has uncovered ubiquitous structural variation of all kinds between closely related species, offering a level of resolution that previous cytogenetic and comparative genetic mapping studies could never achieve (Huang and Rieseberg, 2020; Mérot et al., 2020).”

    From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Huang and Rieseberg, 2020

    The Comparative Genetic Mapping and Comparative Genomic Studies sections report that genomic studies found many more inversions between closely related plant genomes than earlier mapping and cytogenetic approaches detected. The paper does not establish that structural variation of all kinds is ubiquitous: its comparison concerns chiefly inversions, and the Different Likelihood section says increased resolution yielded little or no increase in detected inter-chromosomal translocations. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Examples include the origin of dune sunflower ecotypes in the southwestern US, in which traits associated with dune adaptation and RI map to inversions that are old and pre-date ecotype divergence.

    “Examples include the origin of dune sunflower ecotypes in the southwestern US, in which traits associated with dune adaptation and RI map to inversions, which are old and pre-date ecotype divergence (Ostevik et al., 2016; Huang and Rieseberg, 2020; Todesco et al., 2020).”

    From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Huang and Rieseberg, 2020

    The Role in Speciation section (page unavailable) says seed size drives reproductive isolation between dune and non-dune sunflower ecotypes and maps to three inversions. Origin and Establishment of Inversions (page unavailable) says Helianthus inversion haplotypes typically predate species splits, but does not establish that the particular dune-associated inversions predate dune ecotype divergence. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Access to high-quality genomes, in combination with enhanced algorithms and tools for SV detection, has allowed detailed interrogation of structural variation in both model and non-model species.

    “Access to such genomes, in combination with enhanced algorithms and tools for SV detection, has allowed detailed interrogation of structural variation in both model and non-model species (Wellenreuther et al., 2019; Huang and Rieseberg, 2020; Lei et al., 2021).”

    From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Huang and Rieseberg, 2020

  • Other studies have examined the role of chromosomal rearrangements in speciation via their effects on hybrid sterility or recombination suppression.

    “Other studies have examined the role of chromosomal rearrangements in speciation via their effects on hybrid sterility (reviewed in Fishman and Sweigart, 2018) or recombination suppression (reviewed in Huang and Rieseberg, 2020; Mérot et al., 2020).”

    From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Huang and Rieseberg, 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 111 · Cited by 150

Research works printed but not linked: 99

  1. Ahmad Q. N. Britten E. J. Byth D. E. (1979). Inversion heterozygosity in the hybrid soybean × Glycine soja: evidence from a pachytene loop configuration and other meiotic irregularities. J. Heredity 70 358– 364. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109277 · DOI
  2. Ahn S. Tanksley S. D. (1993). Comparative linkage maps of the rice and maize genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90 7980– 7984. 10.1073/pnas.90.17.7980 8103599 PMC47271 · DOI
  3. Anderson L. K. Covey P. A. Larsen L. R. Bedinger P. Stack S. M. (2010). Structural differences in chromosomes distinguish species in the tomato clade. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 129 24– 34. 10.1159/000313850 20551606 · DOI
  4. Ayala D. Fontaine M. C. Cohuet A. Fontenille D. Vitalis R. Simard F. (2010). Chromosomal inversions, natural selection and adaptation in the malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28 745– 758. 10.1093/molbev/msq248 20837604 PMC3002248 · DOI
  5. Ayala F. J. Coluzzi M. (2005). Chromosome speciation: humans, Drosophila, and mosquitoes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102(Suppl. 1), 6535– 6542. 10.1073/pnas.0501847102 15851677 PMC1131864 · DOI
  6. Barb J. G. Bowers J. E. Renaut S. Rey J. I. Knapp S. J. Rieseberg L. H. (2014). Chromosomal evolution and patterns of introgression in Helianthus. Genetics 197 969– 979. 10.1534/genetics.114.165548 24770331 PMC4096374 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bergero R. Forrest A. Kamau E. Charlesworth D. (2007). Evolutionary strata on the X chromosomes of the dioecious plant Silene latifolia: evidence from new sex-linked genes. Genetics 175 1945– 1954. 10.1534/genetics.106.070110 17287532 PMC1855140 · DOI
  8. Berhan A. M. Hulbert S. H. Butler L. G. Bennetzen J. L. (1993). Structure and evolution of the genomes of Sorghum bicolor and Zea mays. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86 598– 604. 10.1007/BF00838715 24193709 · DOI
  9. Bonierbale M. W. Plaisted R. L. Tanksley S. D. (1988). RFLP maps based on a common set of clones reveal modes of chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics 120 1095– 1103. 17246486 PMC1203572
  10. Burger R. Akerman A. (2011). The effects of linkage and gene flow on local adaptation: a two-locus continent–island model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 80 272– 288. 10.1016/j.tpb.2011.07.002 21801739 PMC3257863 · DOI
  11. Burke J. M. Lai Z. Salmaso M. Nakazato T. Tang S. Heesacker A. (2004). Comparative mapping and rapid karyotypic evolution in the genus Helianthus. Genetics 167 449– 457. 10.1534/genetics.167.1.449 15166168 PMC1470840 · DOI
  12. Charlesworth B. Barton N. H. (2018). The spread of an inversion with migration and selection. Genetics 208 377– 382. 10.1534/genetics.117.300426 29158424 PMC5753870 · DOI
  13. Charlesworth D. (2012). Plant sex chromosome evolution. J. Exp. Bot. 64 405– 420. 10.1093/jxb/ers322 23125359 · DOI
  14. Chen J. Huang Q. Gao D. Wang J. Lang Y. Liu T. (2013). Whole-genome sequencing of Oryza brachyantha reveals mechanisms underlying Oryza genome evolution. Nat. Commun. 4: 1595. 10.1038/ncomms2596 23481403 PMC3615480 · DOI
  15. Coughlan J. M. Willis J. H. (2019). Dissecting the role of a large chromosomal inversion in life history divergence throughout the Mimulus guttatus species complex. Mol. Ecol. 28 1343– 1357. 10.1111/mec.14804 30028906 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Coyne J. A. (1989). A test of the role of meiotic drive in chromosome evolution. Genetics 123 241– 243. 2806886 PMC1203787
  17. Delprat A. Negre B. Puig M. Ruiz A. (2009). The transposon Galileo generates natural chromosomal inversions in Drosophila by ectopic recombination. PLoS One 4: e7883. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007883 19936241 PMC2775673 · DOI
  18. Dobzhansky T. G. (1970). Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  19. Drost D. R. Novaes E. Boaventura-Novaes C. Benedict C. I. Brown R. S. Yin T. (2009). A microarray-based genotyping and genetic mapping approach for highly heterozygous outcrossing species enables localization of a large fraction of the unassembled Populus trichocarpa genome sequence. Plant J. 58 1054– 1067. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03828.x 19220791 · DOI
  20. Dvorak J. Wang L. Zhu T. Jorgensen C. M. Deal K. R. Dai X. (2018). Structural variation and rates of genome evolution in the grass family seen through comparison of sequences of genomes greatly differing in size. Plant J. 95 487– 503. 10.1111/tpj.13964 29770515 · DOI
  21. Faria R. Chaube P. Morales H. E. Larsson T. Lemmon A. R. Lemmon E. M. (2019). Multiple chromosomal rearrangements in a hybrid zone between Littorina saxatilis ecotypes. Mol. Ecol. 28 1375– 1393. 10.1111/mec.14972 30537056 PMC6518922 · DOI
  22. Feder J. L. Berlocher S. H. Roethele J. B. Dambroski H. Smith J. J. Perry W. L. (2003a). Allopatric genetic origins for sympatric host-plant shifts and race formation in Rhagoletis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 10314– 10319. 10.1073/pnas.1730757100 12928500 PMC193558 · DOI
  23. Feder J. L. Roethele J. B. Filchak K. Niedbalski J. Romero-Severson J. (2003b). Evidence for inversion polymorphism related to sympatric host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella. Genetics 163 939– 953. 12663534 PMC1462491
  24. Feder J. L. Gejji R. Powell T. H. Nosil P. (2011). Adaptive chromosomal divergence driven by mixed geographic mode of evolution. Evolution 65 2157– 2170. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01321.x 21790566 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Feschotte C. Pritham E. J. (2007). DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41 331– 368. 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090448 18076328 PMC2167627 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Fishman L. Stathos A. Beardsley P. M. Williams C. F. Hill J. P. (2013). Chromosomal rearrangements and the genetics of reproductive barriers in Mimulus (monkey flowers). Evolution 67 2547– 2560. 10.1111/evo.12154 24033166 · DOI
  27. Flagel L. E. Blackman B. K. Fishman L. Monnahan P. J. Sweigart A. Kelly J. K. (2019). GOOGA: a platform to synthesize mapping experiments and identify genomic structural diversity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15: e1006949. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006949 30986215 PMC6483263 · DOI
  28. Fransz P. Linc G. Lee C. R. Aflitos S. A. Lasky J. R. Toomajian C. (2016). Molecular, genetic and evolutionary analysis of a paracentric inversion in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 88 159– 178. 10.1111/tpj.13262 27436134 PMC5113708 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Garcia-Mas J. Benjak A. Sanseverino W. Bourgeois M. Mir G. González V. M. (2012). The genome of melon (Cucumis melo L.). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 11872– 11877. 10.1073/pnas.1205415109 22753475 PMC3406823 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Gopinathan M. C. Babu C. R. (1986). Meiotic studies of the F 1 hybrid between rice bean (Vigna umbellata) and its wild relative V. minima. Genetica 71 115– 117. 10.1007/bf00058693 · DOI
  31. Gray Y. H. (2000). It takes two transposons to tango: transposable-element-mediated chromosomal rearrangements. Trends Genet. 16 461– 468. 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02104-1 11050333 · DOI
  32. Hobza R. Kejnovsky E. Vyskot B. Widmer A. (2007). The role of chromosomal rearrangements in the evolution of Silene latifolia sex chromosomes. Mol. Genet. Genomics 278 633– 638. 10.1007/s00438-007-0279-0 17671795 · DOI
  33. Hoffmann A. A. Rieseberg L. H. (2008). Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 39 21– 42. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173532 20419035 PMC2858385 · DOI
  34. Hooper D. M. Price T. D. (2017). Chromosomal inversion differences correlate with range overlap in passerine birds. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1 1526– 1534. 10.1038/s41559-017-0284-6 29185507 · DOI
  35. Hu T. T. Pattyn P. Bakker E. G. Cao J. Cheng J. F. Clark R. M. (2011). The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nat. Genet. 43 476– 481. 10.1038/ng.807 21478890 PMC3083492 · DOI
  36. Huang K. Andrew R. L. Owens G. L. Ostevik K. L. Rieseberg L. H. (2019). Multiple chromosomal inversions contribute to adaptive divergence of a dune sunflower ecotype. bioRxiv [Preprint] Available online at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/829622v1 (accessed November 7, 2019). 32246540 · DOI
  37. Huang S. Li R. Zhang Z. Li L. Gu X. Fan W. (2009). The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Nat. Genet. 41 1275– 1281. 10.1038/ng.475 19881527 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Kemppainen P. Knight C. G. Sarma D. K. Hlaing T. Prakash A. Maung Maung Y. N. (2015). Linkage disequilibrium network analysis (LDna) gives a global view of chromosomal inversions, local adaptation and geographic structure. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15 1031– 1045. 10.1111/1755-0998.12369 25573196 PMC4681347 · DOI
  39. King M. (1993). Species Evolution: the Role of Chromosome Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Kirkpatrick M. Barton N. (2006). Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173 419– 434. 10.1534/genetics.105.047985 16204214 PMC1461441 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Knoll A. Fauser F. Puchta H. (2014). DNA recombination in somatic plant cells: mechanisms and evolutionary consequences. Chromosome Res. 22 191– 201. 10.1007/s10577-014-9415-y 24788060 · DOI
  42. Konishi T. Linde-Laursen I. (1988). Spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements in cultivated and wild barleys. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75 237– 243. 10.1007/bf00303959 · DOI
  43. Korunes K. L. Noor M. A. (2019). Pervasive gene conversion in chromosomal inversion heterozygotes. Mol. Ecol. 28 1302– 1315. 10.1111/mec.14921 30387889 PMC6475484 · DOI
  44. Krimbas C. B. Powell J. R. (1992). Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  45. Lagercrantz U. (1998). Comparative mapping between Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica nigra indicates that Brassica genomes have evolved through extensive genome replication accompanied by chromosome fusions and frequent rearrangements. Genetics 150 1217– 1228. 9799273 PMC1460378
  46. Lande R. (1979). Effective deme sizes during long-term evolution estimated from rates of chromosomal rearrangement. Evolution 33(1 Part 1), 234– 251. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04678.x 28568063 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Lee C. R. Wang B. Mojica J. P. Mandáková T. Prasad K. V. Goicoechea J. L. (2017). Young inversion with multiple linked QTLs under selection in a hybrid zone. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1: 119. PMC5607633 28812690
  48. Lewis H. Roberts M. R. (1956). The origin of Clarkia lingulata. Evolution 10 126– 138. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1956.tb02839.x · DOI
  49. Li H. Ralph P. (2019). Local PCA shows how the effect of population structure differs along the genome. Genetics 211 289– 304. 10.1534/genetics.118.301747 30459280 PMC6325702 · DOI
  50. Li S. F. Su T. Cheng G. Q. Wang B. X. Li X. Deng C. L. (2017). Chromosome evolution in connection with repetitive sequences and epigenetics in plants. Genes 8: 290. 10.3390/genes8100290 29064432 PMC5664140 · DOI
  51. Lister C. Jackson D. Martin C. (1993). Transposon-induced inversion in Antirrhinum modifies nivea gene expression to give a novel flower color pattern under the control of cycloidearadialis. Plant Cell 5 1541– 1553. 10.1105/tpc.5.11.1541 8312739 PMC160384 · DOI
  52. Lowry D. B. Popovic D. Brennan D. J. Holeski L. M. (2019). Mechanisms of a locally adaptive shift in allocation among growth, reproduction, and herbivore resistance in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 73 1168– 1181. 10.1111/evo.13699 30793293 · DOI
  53. Lowry D. B. Willis J. H. (2010). A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation. PLoS Biol. 8: e1000500. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000500 20927411 PMC2946948 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Lysak M. A. Berr A. Pecinka A. Schmidt R. McBreen K. Schubert I. (2006). Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 5224– 5229. 10.1073/pnas.0510791103 16549785 PMC1458822 · DOI
  55. Lysak M. A. Cheung K. Kitschke M. Bures P. (2007). Ancestral chromosomal blocks are triplicated in Brassiceae species with varying chromosome number and genome size. Plant Physiol. 145 402– 410. 10.1104/pp.107.104380 17720758 PMC2048728 · DOI
  56. Lysak M. A. Lexer C. (2006). Towards the era of comparative evolutionary genomics in Brassicaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 259 175– 198. 10.1007/s00606-006-0418-9 · DOI
  57. Mandakova T. Lysak M. A. (2008). Chromosomal phylogeny and karyotype evolution in x=7 crucifer species (Brassicaceae). Plant Cell 20 2559– 2570. 10.1105/tpc.108.062166 18836039 PMC2590746 · DOI
  58. Mandakova T. Singh V. Kraemer U. Lysak M. A. (2015). Genome structure of the heavy metal hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens and its stability on metalliferous and nonmetalliferous soils. Plant Physiol. 169 674– 689. 10.1104/pp.15.00619 26195571 PMC4577401 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Navarro A. Barton N. H. (2003). Accumulating postzygotic isolation genes in parapatry: a new twist on chromosomal speciation. Evolution 57 447– 459. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01537.x 12703935 · DOI
  60. Nicolas M. Marais G. Hykelova V. Janousek B. Laporte V. Vyskot B. (2004). A gradual process of recombination restriction in the evolutionary history of the sex chromosomes in dioecious plants. PLoS Biol. 3: e4. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030004 15630476 PMC536007 · DOI
  61. Noor M. A. Grams K. L. Bertucci L. A. Reiland J. (2001). Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 12084– 12088. 10.1073/pnas.221274498 11593019 PMC59771 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Oneal E. Lowry D. B. Wright K. M. Zhu Z. Willis J. H. (2014). Divergent population structure and climate associations of a chromosomal inversion polymorphism across the Mimulus guttatus species complex. Mol. Ecol. 23 2844– 2860. 10.1111/mec.12778 24796267 PMC4111140 · DOI
  63. Ortiz-Barrientos D. Reiland J. Hey J. Noor M. A. (2002). Recombination and the divergence of hybridizing species. Genetica 116 167– 178. 10.1007/978-94-010-0265-3_2 12555775 · DOI
  64. Ostevik K. L. Andrew R. L. Otto S. P. Rieseberg L. H. (2016). Multiple reproductive barriers separate recently diverged sunflower ecotypes. Evolution 70 2322– 2335. 10.1111/evo.13027 27479368 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Ostevik K. L. Samuk K. Rieseberg L. H. (2019). Ancestral reconstruction of sunflower karyotypes reveals dramatic chromosomal evolution. bioRxiv [Preprint] Available online at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/737155v1 (accessed August 15, 2019). PMC7153943 32033968 · DOI
  66. Owens G. L. Baute G. J. Rieseberg L. H. (2016). Revisiting a classic case of introgression: hybridization and gene flow in Californian sunflowers. Mol. Ecol. 25 2630– 2643. 10.1111/mec.13569 26840428 · DOI
  67. Qin C. Yu C. Shen Y. Fang X. Chen L. Min J. (2014). Whole-genome sequencing of cultivated and wild peppers provides insights into Capsicum domestication and specialization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 5135– 5140. 10.1073/pnas.1400975111 24591624 PMC3986200 · DOI
  68. Rieseberg L. H. Van Fossen C. Desrochers A. M. (1995). Hybrid speciation accompanied by genomic reorganization in wild sunflowers. Nature 375 313– 316. 10.1038/375313a0 · DOI
  69. Rodriguez S. Perera E. Maestra B. Diez M. Naranjo T. (2000). Chromosome structure of Triticum timopheevii relative to T. turgidum. Genome 43 923– 930. 10.1139/gen-43-6-923 11195344 · DOI
  70. Searle J. B. (1993). “ Chromosomal hybrid zones in eutherian mammals,” in Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process, ed. Harrison R. G. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 309– 353.
  71. Servedio M. R. (2000). Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 54 21– 29. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00003.x 10937179 · DOI
  72. Servedio M. R. (2009). The role of linkage disequilibrium in the evolution of premating isolation. Heredity 102 51– 56. 10.1038/hdy.2008.98 18813328 · DOI
  73. Stein J. Quarin C. L. Martínez E. J. Pessino S. C. Ortiz J. P. A. (2004). Tetraploid races of Paspalum notatum show polysomic inheritance and preferential chromosome pairing around the apospory-controlling locus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109 186– 191. 10.1007/s00122-004-1614-z 14985979 · DOI
  74. Sturtevant A. H. (1921). A case of rearrangement of genes in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 7 235– 237. 10.1073/pnas.7.8.235 16576597 PMC1084859 · DOI
  75. Sun Y. Svedberg J. Hiltunen M. Corcoran P. Johannesson H. (2017). Large-scale suppression of recombination predates genomic rearrangements in Neurospora tetrasperma. Nat. Commun. 8: 1140. 10.1038/s41467-017-01317-6 29074958 PMC5658415 · DOI
  76. Sybenga J. (1975). Meiotic Configurations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  77. Szinay D. Wijnker E. van den Berg R. Visser R. G. de Jong H. Bai Y. (2012). Chromosome evolution in Solanum traced by cross-species BAC-FISH. New Phytol. 195 688– 698. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04195.x 22686400 · DOI
  78. Tanksley S. D. Ganal M. W. Prince J. P. De Vicente M. C. Bonierbale M. W. Broun P. (1992). High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132 1141– 1160. 1360934 PMC1205235
  79. Todesco M. Owens G. L. Bercovich N. Légaré J. S. Soudi S. Burge D. O. (2019). Massive haplotypes underlie ecotypic differentiation in sunflowers. bioRxiv [Preprint] Available online at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/790279v1 (accessed October 2, 2019). 32641831 · DOI
  80. Tong C. Li H. Wang Y. Li X. Ou J. Wang D. (2016). Construction of high-density linkage maps of Populus deltoides × P. simonii using restriction-site associated DNA sequencing. PLoS One 11: e0150692. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150692 26964097 PMC4786213 · DOI
  81. Tuttle E. M. Bergland A. O. Korody M. L. Brewer M. S. Newhouse D. J. Minx P. (2016). Divergence and functional degradation of a sex chromosome-like supergene. Curr. Biol. 26 344– 350. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.069 26804558 PMC4747794 · DOI
  82. Twyford A. D. Friedman J. (2015). Adaptive divergence in the monkey flower Mimulus guttatus is maintained by a chromosomal inversion. Evolution 69 1476– 1486. 10.1111/evo.12663 25879251 PMC5029580 · DOI
  83. Wang J. Na J. K. Yu Q. Gschwend A. R. Han J. Zeng F. (2012). Sequencing papaya X and Yh chromosomes reveals molecular basis of incipient sex chromosome evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 13710– 13715. 10.1073/pnas.1207833109 22869747 PMC3427123 · DOI
  84. Wellenreuther M. Bernatchez L. (2018). Eco-evolutionary genomics of chromosomal inversions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33 427– 440. 10.1016/j.tree.2018.04.002 29731154 · DOI
  85. White M. J. D. (1973). Animal Cytology and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  86. Wright A. E. Dean R. Zimmer F. Mank J. E. (2016). How to make a sex chromosome. Nat. Commun. 7: 12087. PMC4932193 27373494
  87. Wu F. Eannetta N. T. Xu Y. Durrett R. Mazourek M. Jahn M. M. (2009). A COSII genetic map of the pepper genome provides a detailed picture of synteny with tomato and new insights into recent chromosome evolution in the genus Capsicum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118 1279– 1293. 10.1007/s00122-009-0980-y 19229514 · DOI
  88. Wu F. Tanksley S. D. (2010). Chromosomal evolution in the plant family Solanaceae. BMC Genomics 11: 182. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-182 20236516 PMC2847972 · DOI
  89. Xu L. Auer G. Peona V. Suh A. Deng Y. Feng S. (2019). Dynamic evolutionary history and gene content of sex chromosomes across diverse songbirds. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3 834– 844. 10.1038/s41559-019-0850-1 30936435 · DOI
  90. Yang L. Koo D. H. Li Y. Zhang X. Luan F. Havey M. J. (2012). Chromosome rearrangements during domestication of cucumber as revealed by high-density genetic mapping and draft genome assembly. Plant J. 71 895– 906. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05017.x 22487099 · DOI
  91. Yang Z. Ge X. Yang Z. Qin W. Sun G. Wang Z. (2019). Extensive intraspecific gene order and gene structural variations in upland cotton cultivars. Nat. Commun. 10: 2989. 10.1038/s41467-019-10820-x 31278252 PMC6611876 · DOI
  92. Yogeeswaran K. Frary A. York T. L. Amenta A. Lesser A. H. Nasrallah J. B. (2005). Comparative genome analyses of Arabidopsis spp: inferring chromosomal rearrangement events in the evolutionary history of A. thaliana. Genome Res. 15 505– 515. 10.1101/gr.3436305 15805492 PMC1074365 · DOI
  93. Yu C. Zhang J. Peterson T. (2011). Genome rearrangements in maize induced by alternative transposition of reversed Ac/Ds termini. Genetics 188 59– 67. 10.1534/genetics.111.126847 21339479 PMC3120142 · DOI
  94. Zapata L. Ding J. Willing E. M. Hartwig B. Bezdan D. Jiao W. B. (2016). Chromosome-level assembly of Arabidopsis thaliana Ler reveals the extent of translocation and inversion polymorphisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113 E4052– E4060. 10.1073/pnas.1607532113 27354520 PMC4948326 · DOI
  95. Zhang J. Peterson T. (2004). Transposition of reversed Ac element ends generates chromosome rearrangements in maize. Genetics 167 1929– 1937. 10.1534/genetics.103.026229 15342530 PMC1471009 · DOI
  96. Zhang J. Q. Imerovski I. Borkowski K. Huang K. Burge D. Rieseberg L. H. (2019). Intraspecific genetic divergence within Helianthus niveus and the status of two new morphotypes from Mexico. Am. J. Bot. 106 1229– 1239. 10.1002/ajb2.1349 31461165 · DOI
  97. Zhou Y. Minio A. Massonnet M. Solares E. Lv Y. Beridze T. (2019). The population genetics of structural variants in grapevine domestication. Nat. Plants 5 965– 979. 10.1038/s41477-019-0507-8 31506640 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Ziolkowski P. A. Blanc G. Sadowski J. (2003). Structural divergence of chromosomal segments that arose from successive duplication events in the Arabidopsis genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 1339– 1350. 10.1093/nar/gkg201 12582254 PMC150220 · DOI
  99. Zluvova J. Janousek B. Negrutiu I. Vyskot B. (2005). Comparison of the X and Y chromosome organization in Silene latifolia. Genetics 170 1431– 1434. 10.1534/genetics.105.040444 15879508 PMC1451171 · DOI

Authors
Huang, K., & Rieseberg, L. H.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Kaichi
  • Rieseberg, Loren H.
ORCID
Venue
Frontiers in Plant Science
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2020-03-18
Volume
11
Pages
296-296
ISSN
1664-462X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fpls.2020.00296
PMC
PMC7093584
OpenAlex
W3014099245
Cited by
150
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in Plant Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
chromosomal inversions, plant cytogenetics, karyotype evolution, recombination suppression, assortative mating, speciation, gene flow, sex chromosome evolution, inversion polymorphism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review