Cited by 68Embodied and Extended CognitionFree Will and AgencyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

An Active Inference view of cognitive control

Open access
Pezzulo, Giovanni·2012·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

GENERAL COMMENTARY article Front. Psychol., 05 November 2012Sec. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology Volume 3 - 2012 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00478

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00478

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive control entails a high degree of precision of higher areas such as PFC, so that more cognitively complex and long-term goals dominate the inference.

    “Here, cognitive control entails a high degree of precision of “higher” areas such as PFC, so that more cognitively complex and long-term goals dominate the inference (Pezzulo, 2012, Stoianov et al., 2015).”

    From Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control (2015) · cites this paper as Pezzulo, 2012

    In “An Active Inference view of cognitive control” (page unavailable), Pezzulo links cognitive control to prefrontal hierarchies, longer-timescale goals, strong priors, and top-down guidance of behavior. The copy does not explicitly say that higher areas have a high degree of precision or that this precision makes complex, long-term goals dominate inference; a search for “precision” found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pezzulo, G.
Affiliations
Institute for Computational Linguistics “A. Zampolli” (IT)
Corresponding author
Pezzulo, Giovanni
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2012
Volume
3
Pages
478-478
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994565738
Cited by
68
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
active inference, cognitive control, free energy principle, Bayesian inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review