Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All models implemented the maximal random effects structure allowed by the data.
“All models implemented the maximal random effect's structure allowed by the data (i.e., by-participant random intercepts and slopes) in the first instance (Barr 2013).”
From Mild traumatic brain injury alters function in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS-EEG study (2025) · cites this paper as Barr 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Barr D. J. Levy R. Scheepers C. Tily H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 255– 278 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 PMC3881361 24403724 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Understanding Mixed-Effects Models Through Data Simulation
DeBruine, L. M., & Barr, D. J. (2021) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920965119 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationVariation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking
Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Barthel, M., Sauppe, S., Levinson, S. C., & Meyer, A. S. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01858 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a2ydw · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Zunhammer, M., Geis, S., Busch, V., Greenlee, M. W., & Eichhammer, P. (2015) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000142 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Speech Planning at Turn Transitions in Dialog Is Associated With Increased Processing Load
Barthel, M., & Sauppe, S. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12768 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Modeling individual vocal differences in group-living lemurs using vocal tract morphology
Gamba, M., Favaro, L., Araldi, A., Matteucci, V., Giacoma, C., & Friard, O. (2017) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/cz/zox023 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Do Humans Trust Advice More if it Comes from AI? An Analysis of Human-AI Interactions
Vodrahalli, K., Daneshjou, R., Gerstenberg, T., & Zou, J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07015 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Mild traumatic brain injury alters function in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS-EEG study
Moore, E., Webb, E., Sasaki, R., Rogasch, N. C., Foo, N., Semmler, J. G., & Opie, G. M. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.22.655676 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“All models implemented the maximal random effect’s structure allowed by the data (i.e., by-participant random intercepts and slopes) in the first instance (Barr 2013).”
Predicting emotional valence in autism: a preregistered study in the Bayesian Brain framework
Plank, I. S., Pior, A., Yurova, A., Nowak, J., Shi, Z., & Falter-Wagner, C. M. (2026) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/s13229-026-00730-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Maximal slopes for the group-level were added, where possible [47, 48].”
- Authors
- Barr, D. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Barr, Dale J.
- ORCID
- Barr, Dale J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 328-328
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3672519
- OpenAlex
- W1995113307
- Cited by
- 782
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15
- FWCI
- 16.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- interaction effects, linear mixed models, random slopes, random intercepts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
