Cited by 16Action Observation and SynchronizationPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

A systematic review of hyperscanning in clinical encounters

Open access
Adel, Lena, Moses, Lisane, Irvine, Elisabeth, Greenway, Kyle T., Dumas, Guillaume, Lifshitz, Michael·2025·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Therapeutic alliance is defined as the collaborative relationship between patient and therapist. Strong therapeutic alliances have been associated with positive clinical outcomes, but much remains unknown about alliance and its physiological basis. Interpersonal neural synchrony (INS) - the synchronization of neural signals between interacting individuals - is emerging as a novel lens for studying interactions with relatively objective and time-sensitive neuroimaging techniques. We searched four databases to identify studies of INS in clinical encounters. Our search yielded 161 articles, 46 met criteria for full-text review and 11 were included. The included articles reported INS across a total of 160 dyads, all published since 2018. Despite diverse methodologies, INS was observed in all studies and was often related to therapeutic outcomes. However, results were mixed regarding associations between INS and therapeutic alliance. These results highlight that, while promising, additional research is needed to elucidate the relationship between INS, therapeutic alliance and clinical outcomes. Future studies should aim to standardize methodologies, explore temporal dynamics (e.g., through longitudinal assessments), and include larger sample sizes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106248

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adel, L., Moses, L., Irvine, E., Greenway, K. T., Dumas, G., & Lifshitz, M.
Affiliations
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Adel, Lena
  • Lifshitz, Michael
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-09
Volume
176
Pages
106248
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411079423
Cited by
13
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec
  • Usona Institute (CF00137433)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (DGECR-2023-00089)
  • Fondation de l'Hôpital général juif
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes eV
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
hyperscanning, interpersonal neural synchrony, therapeutic relationship, patient encounters, patient-therapist interaction, neuronal synchronization, clinical outcomes
MeSH terms
Therapeutic Alliance, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review