Cited by 87

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parasocial Interactions and Relationships in Early Adolescence

Gleason, Tracy R., Theran, Sally A., Newberg, Emily M.·2017·Frontiers in Psychology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00255

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Adams-Price, 1990, Secondary attachments and adolescent self concept., Sex Roles, 22, 187, 10.1007/BF00288191 · DOI
  2. Auter, 1992, TV that talks back: an experimental validation of parasocial interaction scale., J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, 36, 173, 10.1080/08838159209364165 · DOI
  3. Berscheid, 2005, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relationships.
  4. Bond, 2014, Parasocial breakup among young children in the United States., J. Children Media, 8, 474, 10.1080/17482798.2014.953559 · DOI
  5. Boon, 2001, Admirer-celebrity relationships among young adults: explaining perceptions of celebrity influence on identity., Hum. Commun. Res., 27, 432, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00788.x · DOI
  6. Brunick, 2016, Children’s future parasocial relationships with media characters: the age of intelligent characters., J. Children Media, 10, 181, 10.1080/17482798.2015.1127839 · DOI
  7. Calvert, 2014, “Children’s parasocial relationships,” in, Media and the Well-Being of Children and Adolescents, 187
  8. Cohen, 1999, Favorite characters of teenage viewers of Israeli serials., J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, 43, 327, 10.1080/08838159909364495 · DOI
  9. Cohen, 2003, Parasocial breakups: measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships., Mass Commun. Soc., 6, 191, 10.1207/S15327825MCS0602_5 · DOI
  10. Cohen, 2004, Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: the role of attachment styles and relationship intensity., J. Soc. Pers. Relat., 21, 187, 10.1177/0265407504041374 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cole, 1999, Attachment styles and intimate television viewing: insecurely forming relationships in a parasocial way., J. Soc. Pers. Relat., 16, 495, 10.1177/0265407599164005 · DOI
  12. Derrick, 2009, Social surrogacy: how favored television programs provide the experience of belonging., J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 45, 352, 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003 · DOI
  13. Derrick, 2008, Parasocial relationships and self-discrepancies: faux relationships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals., Pers. Relat., 15, 261, 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00197.x · DOI
  14. Dibble, 2011, Parasocial interaction as more than friendship: evidence for parasocial interactions with disliked media figures., J. Media Psychol., 23, 122, 10.1027/1864-1105/a000044 · DOI
  15. Erikson, 1968, Identity: Youth and Crisis.
  16. Giles, 2002, Parasocial interaction: a review of the literature and a model for future research., Media Psychol., 4, 279, 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00154-5 · DOI
  17. Giles, 2004, The role of media figures in adolescent development: relations between autonomy, attachment, and interest in celebrities., Pers. Individ. Differ., 36, 813, 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00154-5 · DOI
  18. Greenwood, 2009, Idealized TV friends and young women’s body concerns., Body Image, 6, 97, 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.12.001 · DOI
  19. Hartmann, 2008, Positive parasocial relationships with drivers affect suspense in racing sport spectators., J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl., 20, 24, 10.1027/1864-1105.20.1.24 · DOI
  20. Hartup, 1995, The three faces of friendship., J. Soc. Pers. Relat., 12, 569, 10.1177/0265407595124012 · DOI
  21. Hoffner, 1996, Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters., J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, 40, 389, 10.1080/08838159609364360 · DOI
  22. Klimmt, 2006, Parasocial interactions and relationships, Psychology of Entertainment, 291
  23. Madison, 2015, The people we meet: discriminating functions of parasocial interactions., Imagin. Cogn. Pers., 35, 47, 10.1177/0276236615574490 · DOI
  24. Madison, 2016, Cognitive and imagery attributes of parasocial relationships., Imagin. Cogn. Pers., 35, 359, 10.1177/0276236615599340 · DOI
  25. Maltby, 2006, Extreme celebrity worship, fantasy proneness and dissociation: developing the measurement and understanding of celebrity worship within a clinical personality context., Pers. Individ. Differ., 40, 273, 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.004 · DOI
  26. Maltby, 2005, Intense-personal celebrity worship and body image: evidence of a link among female adolescents., Br. J. Health Psychol., 10, 17, 10.1348/135910704X15257 · DOI
  27. McCutcheon, 2004, Celebrity Worshippers: Inside the Minds of Stargazers.
  28. Rhodes, 2006, A model for the influence of mentoring relationships on youth development., J. Commun. Psychol., 34, 691, 10.1002/jcop.20124 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rosaen, 2008, Investigating the relationships among child’s age, parasocial interactions, and the social realism of favorite television characters., Commun. Res. Rep., 25, 145, 10.1080/08824090802021806 · DOI
  30. Rubin, 1987, Audience activity and soap opera involvement: a uses and effects investigation., Hum. Commun. Res., 14, 246, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x · DOI
  31. Rubin, 1985, Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing., Hum. Commun. Res., 12, 155, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x · DOI
  32. Rubin, 1987, Development of parasocial interaction relationships., J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, 31, 279, 10.1080/08838158709386664 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Rubin, 2001, “Attribution in social and parasocial relationships,” in, Attribution, Communication Behavior, and Close Relationships, 320
  34. Schiappa, 2007, “Parasocial relationships and television: a meta-analysis of the effects,” in, Mass Media Effects Research: Advances through Meta-Analysis, 301
  35. Schramm, 2008, The PSI-process scales: a new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes., Communications, 33, 385, 10.1515/COMM.2008.025 · DOI
  36. Singer, 2009, “Make-believe play, imagination and creativity: links to children’s media exposure,” in, Handbook of Children, Media and Development, 290
  37. Sood, 2000, Dimensions of parasocial interaction by letter-writers to a popular entertainment-education soap opera in India., J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, 44, 386, 10.1207/s15506878jobem4403_4 · DOI
  38. Tian, 2010, Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series., Mass Commun. Soc., 13, 250, 10.1080/15205430903296051 · DOI
  39. Tsay-Vogel, 2014, Theorizing parasocial interactions based on authenticity: the development of a media figure classification scheme., Psychol. Pop. Med. Cult., 3, 66, 10.1037/a0034615 · DOI
  40. Turner, 1993, Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers., Commun. Q., 41, 443, 10.1080/01463379309369904 · DOI
  41. Wartberg, 2015, Gender-related consequences of internet use perceived by parents in a representative quota sample of adolescents., Behav. Inform. Technol., 34, 341, 10.1080/0144929X.2014.928746 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 87

Metadata

Authors
Gleason, T. R., Theran, S. A., & Newberg, E. M.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2017-02-23
Volume
8
ISSN
1664-1078
Cited by
87
References
4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review