Cited by 77Educational Outcomes and InfluencesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessHigher Education Research Studies

Cognitive Investments in Academic Success: The Role of Need for Cognition at University

Open access
Grass, Julia, Strobel, Alexander, Strobel, Anja·2017·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Previous research has shown that Need for Cognition (NFC), the individual tendency to engage in and enjoy cognitive endeavors, contributes to academic performance. Most studies on NFC and related constructs have thereby focused on grades to capture tertiary academic success. This study aimed at a more comprehensive approach on NFC's meaning to success in university. We examined not only performance but also rather affective indicators of success. The current sample consisted of 396 students of different subjects with a mean age of 24 years (139 male). All participants took part in an online survey that assessed NFC together with school performance and further personality variables via self-report. Success in university was comprehensively operationalized including performance, satisfaction with one's studies, and thoughts about quitting/changing one's major as indicators. The value of NFC in predicting tertiary academic success was examined with correlation analyses and path analysis. NFC significantly correlated with all success variables with the highest correlation for study satisfaction. Path analysis confirmed the importance of NFC for study satisfaction showing that NFC had a significant direct effect on study satisfaction and via this variable also a significant indirect effect on termination thoughts. This study clearly indicates that NFC broadly contributes to the mastery of academic requirements and that it is worthwhile to intensify research on NFC in the context of tertiary education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00790

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High levels of NFC have a positive impact on performance and school grades.

    “High levels of NFC have a positive impact on performance (Weissgerber et al., 2018) and school grades (Grass et al., 2017; Luong et al., 2017; Strobel et al., 2019).”

    From Retrieval Practice Is Effective Regardless of Self-Reported Need for Cognition - Behavioral and Brain Imaging Evidence (2022) · cites this paper as Grass et al., 2017

    Table 2 in Results (page unavailable) reports positive correlations between NFC and both school GPA (r = 0.16) and university GPA (r = 0.19). But the path analysis in Results found no significant direct path from NFC to grades, so the paper supports an association, not the claimed positive impact. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rindermann H. Oubaid V. (1999). Auswahl von Studienanfängern durch Universitäten - Kriterien, Verfahren und Prognostizierbarkeit des Studienerfolgs [College student admission: criteria, procedures, and predictability of study success]. Z. Diff. Diagn. Psychol. [J. Individ. Dif.] 20, 172– 191. 10.1024/0170-1789.20.3.172 · DOI
  2. von Stumm S. Chamorro-Premuzic T. Ackerman P. (2011a). Re-visiting intelligence-personality associations. Vindicating intellectual engagement, in The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Individual Differences, 1st Edn., eds Chamorro-Premuzic T. von Stumm S. Furnham A. (Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell), 217– 241.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grass, J., Strobel, A., & Strobel, A.
Affiliations
Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Grass, Julia
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2017-05-16
Volume
8
Pages
790-790
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2615256180
Cited by
77
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
need for cognition, academic performance, university students, learning satisfaction, higher education, personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review