Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validating the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II) Using Set-ESEM: Identifying Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Sample of School Principals

Open access
Dicke, Theresa, Marsh, Herbert W., Riley, Philip, Parker, Philip D., Guo, Jiesi, Horwood, Marcus·2018·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

School principals world-wide report high levels of strain and attrition resulting in a shortage of qualified principals. It is thus, crucial to identify psychosocial risk factors that reflect principals’ occupational wellbeing. For this purpose, we used the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II), a widely used self-report measure covering multiple psychosocial factors identified by leading occupational stress theories. We evaluated the COPSOQ-II regarding factor structure and longitudinal, discriminant, and convergent validity using latent structural equation modeling in a large sample of Australian school principals (N = 2,049). Results reveal that confirmatory factor analysis produced marginally acceptable model fit. A novel approach we call set exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM-set), where cross-loadings were only allowed within a priori defined sets of factors, fit well, and was more parsimonious than a full ESEM. Further multitrait-multimethod models based on the set-ESEM confirm the importance of a principal’s psychosocial risk factors; Stressors and depression were related to demands and ill-being, while confidence and autonomy were related to wellbeing. We also show that working in the private sector was beneficial for showing a low psychosocial risk, while other demographics have little effects. Finally, we identify five latent risk profiles (high risk to no risk) of school principals based on all psychosocial factors. Overall the research presented here closes the theory application gap of a strong multi-dimensional measure of psychosocial risk-factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00584

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Dadaczynski, 2011, Psychische Gesundheit aus Sicht von Schulleitungen: Erste Ergebnisse einer internationalen Onlinestudie für Deutschland [Psychological health from principals' perspective: First results of a German online study], Psychol. Erziehung Unterricht, 58, 306, 10.2378/peu2011.art08d · doi:10.2378/peu2011.art08d
  2. Dadaczynski, 2015, Healthy principals–healthy schools? A neglected perspective to school health promotion, 253, 10.1007/978-94-017-9171-7_12 · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9171-7_12
  3. Day, 2011, Leadership development, 37
  4. Fuller, 2017, Questioning the use of outcome measures to evaluate principal preparation programs, Leadership Policy Schools, 1, 10.1080/15700763.2016.1270332 · doi:10.1080/15700763.2016.1270332
  5. Gates, 2006, Mobility and turnover among school principals, Econ. Educ. Rev., 25, 289, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.01.008 · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.01.008
  6. Kompier, 2003, Job design and well-being, 429
  7. Kuipers, 1993, Slagvaardig organiseren: inleiding in de sociotechniek als integrale ontwerpleer [ Successful organization: introduction to the socio-technic approach as integral design theory]
  8. Marsh, 1988, Multitrait-multimethod analyses, 570
  9. Phillips, 2011, Stress in head teachers, 177, 10.4337/9780857931153.00029 · doi:10.4337/9780857931153.00029
  10. 2014, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  11. Riley, 2014, The Australian Principal Occupational Health, Safety & Well-Being Survey: 2011-2014 Data.
  12. Riley, 2015, The Australian Principal Occupational Health, Safety & Well-Being Survey: 2015 Data.
  13. Riley, 2017, The Australian Principal Occupational Health, Safety & Well-Being Survey: 2016 Data.
  14. Rosário, 2014, Cultural and linguistic adaptation and validation of the long version of Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) in Portuguese, 441
  15. Sahlberg, 2015, Finnish Schools and the Global Education Reform Movement, 162, 10.4324/9781315678573-19 · doi:10.4324/9781315678573-19
  16. Warr, 1996, Employee well-being

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Dicke, T., Marsh, H. W., Riley, P., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., & Horwood, M.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2018-04-30
Volume
9
Pages
584-584
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2797960792
Cited by
264
References
93
FWCI
67.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
Australian Research Council (LP160101056)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validating the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II) Using Set-ESEM: Identifying Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Sample of School Principals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00584
The paper
Dicke, T., Marsh, H. W., Riley, P., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., & Horwood, M. (2018). Validating the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II) Using Set-ESEM: Identifying Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Sample of School Principals. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00584

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.