Cited by 113Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A Meta-Analysis

Open access
Fang, Junyan, Huang, Xitong, Zhang, Minqiang, Huang, Feifei, Li, Zhe, Yuan, Qiting·2018·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

The Big-fish-little-Pond effect is well acknowledged as the negative effect of class/school average achievement on student academic self-concept, which profoundly impacts student academic performance and mental development. Although a few studies have been done with regard to this effect, inconsistence exists in the effect size with little success in finding moderators. Here, we present a meta-analysis to synthesize related literatures to reach a summary conclusion on the BFLPE. Furthermore, student age, comparison target, academic self-concept domain, student location, sample size, and publication year were examined as potential moderators. 33 studies with 56 effect sizes (total N=1,276,838) were finally included. The random effects model led to a mean of the BFLPE at β= -.28 (p<0.001). Moreover, moderator analyses revealed that the Big-Fish-Little-Pond effect is an age-based process and an intercultural phenomenon, which is stronger among high school students, in Asia and when verbal self-concept is considered. This meta-analysis is the first quantitative systematic overview of BFLPE, whose results are valuable to the understanding of BFLPE and reveal the necessity for educators from all countries to learn about operative means to help students avoid the potential negative effect. Future research expectations are offered subsequently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01569

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research into the Big-Fish-Little-Pond phenomenon suggests that domain-specific academic self-concept, more so than general academic self-concept, is influenced by social comparison.

    “Research into the Big-Fish-Little-Pond phenomenon (i.e., students in high-achieving classes having lower ASC than those with comparable aptitude in regular classes) suggests that domain-specific ASC (more so than general ASC) is influenced by social comparison (Fang et al., 2018;Marsh et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Valentine J. C. Dubois D. L. (2005). Effects of self-beliefs on academic achievement and vice versa. Separating the chicken from the egg, in International Advances in self Research: New Frontiers for Self Research. Vol.2, eds Marsh H. W. Craven R. G. McInerney D. M. (Greenwich, CT: Information Age), 53– 78.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, J., Huang, X., Zhang, M., Huang, F., Li, Z., & Yuan, Q.
Affiliations
South China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Minqiang
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2018-08-29
Volume
9
Pages
1569-1569
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888791412
Cited by
113
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
South China Normal University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
big-fish-little-pond effect, academic self-concept, verbal self-concept, high school students, intercultural differences, age differences, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review