Cited by 174Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Within-school social comparison: How students perceive the standing of their class predicts academic self-concept.

Trautwein, Ulrich, Lüdtke, Oliver, Marsh, Herbert W., Nagy, Gabriel·2009·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Results from prior research indicate that a student's academic self-concept is negatively influenced by the achievement of others in his or her school (a frame of reference effect) and that this negative frame of reference effect is not or only slightly reduced by the quality, standing, or prestige of the track or school attended (a effect). Going beyond prior studies, the present research used both between-school and within-school approaches to investigate frame of reference and reflected glory effects in education, incorporating students' own perceptions of the standing of their school and class. Multilevel analyses were performed with data from 3 large-scale assessments with 4,810, 1,502, and 4,247 students, respectively. Findings from all 3 studies showed that, given comparable individual achievement, placement in high-achieving learning groups was associated with comparatively low academic self-concepts. However, students' academic self-concept was not merely a reflection of their relative position within the class but also substantively associated with their individual and shared perceptions of the class's standing. Moreover, the negative effects of being placed in high-achieving learning groups were weaker for high-achieving students. Overall, the studies support both educational and social psychology theorizing on social comparison.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016306

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial attempts to study mediating processes in longitudinal designs yielded mixed findings with regards to the role of effort in the relationship between academic self-concept and academic achievement.

    “To our knowledge, initial attempts to study mediating processes in longitudinal designs (Marsh et al., 2016;Pinxten et al., 2014;Trautwein et al., 2009) yielded mixed findings with regards to the role of effort in the relationship between ASC and academic achievement.”

    From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Trautwein et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., & Nagy, G.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2009-11
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
853-866
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2033643606
Cited by
174
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
academic self-concept, class standing, learning groups, high-achieving students, school prestige

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review