Cited by 48Language Development and DisordersHearing Impairment and CommunicationChild and Animal Learning Development

Integrated Communication System: Gesture and Language Acquisition in Typically Developing Children and Children With LD and DLD

Open access
Lüke, Carina, Ritterfeld, Ute, Grimminger, Angela, Rohlfing, Katharina J., Liszkowski, Ulf·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Gesture and language development are strongly connected to each other. Two types of gestures in particular are analyzed regarding their role for language acquisition: pointing gestures and iconic gestures. With the present longitudinal study, the predictive values of index-finger pointing at 12 months and the comprehension of iconic gestures at 3;0 years for later language skills in typically developing (TD) children and in children with a language delay (LD) or developmental language disorder (DLD) are examined.Forty-two monolingual German children and their primary caregivers participated in the study and were followed longitudinally from 1;0 to 6;0 years. Within a total of 14 observation sessions, the gestural and language abilities of the children were measured using standardized tests and parent questionnaires as well as ad-hoc tests and semi-natural interactions with the caregivers. At the age of 2;0 years, 10 of the 42 children were identified as having a LD. The ability to point with the extended index finger at 1;0 year is predictive for language skills at 5;0 and 6;0 years. This predictive effect is mediated by the language skills of the children at 3;0 years. The comprehension of iconic gestures at 3;0 years correlates with index-finger pointing at 1;0 year and also with earlier and later language skills. It mediates the predictive value of index-finger pointing at 1;0 year for grammar skills at 5;0 and 6;0 years. Children with LD develop the ability to understand the iconicity in gestures later than TD children and score lower in language tests until the age of 6;0 years. These language differences between the two groups of children remain partially until the age of 5;0 years even when the two children with persistent DLD within the group of children with LD are excluded from analyses. Beyond that age, no differences in the language skills between children with and without a history of LD are found when children with a persistent DLD are excluded.The findings support the assumption of an integrated speech-gesture communication system, which functions similarly in TD children and children with LD or DLD, but with a time delay.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00118

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pointing ability at one year predicts language skills at 5 and 6 years of age, and this effect was mediated by comprehension of iconic gestures between 3-5 years.

    “Lüke et al. [25] observed that pointing ability at one year predicts language skills at 5 and 6 years of age, and this effect was mediated by comprehension of iconic gestures (e.g., opening and closing the extended index and middle finger to represent scissors) between 3–5 years.”

    From Tracking Acquisition of Language in Kids (TALK) study protocol: A longitudinal investigation of infants at high vs. low risk for atypical speech and language development (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results report that index-finger pointing at age 1 predicts later language skills, and that iconic-gesture comprehension at age 3 mediates its relation to grammar skills at ages 5 and 6. The claim overgeneralizes the mediation to language skills as a whole and places gesture comprehension across ages 3–5; the Results explicitly find no such mediation for lexical skills or sentence comprehension and identify age 3 as the mediator measurement. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The findings support an integrated speech-gesture communication system and the importance of early assessment of gesture production and comprehension to detect children with language delay.

    “Their findings support the view of an integrated speech–gesture communication system and the importance of an early assessment of gesture production and comprehension to detect children with LD.”
  • The predictive effect of pointing at 1;0 year on future language skills is mediated by language skills at 3;0 years and by iconic gesture comprehension at 3;0 years for grammar skills at 5;0 and 6;0.

    “This predictive effect is mediated by language skills at 3;0 years and by iconic gesture comprehension at 3;0 years for grammar skills at 5;0 and 6;0.”
  • Pointing with the extended index finger at 1;0 year is predictive of future language skills up to 5;0 and 6;0 years.

    “They showed that pointing with the extended index finger at 1;0 year is predictive of future language skills up to 5;0 and 6;0 years.”
  • The following age ranges have been identified for assessment of potential predictors of DLD: communicative gestures between 12 and 30 months; communication and receptive lexical skills between 15 and 30 months; expressive lexical skills between 15 and 32 months; syntactic comprehension from 28 months onward; word combination from 30 months onward; non-word repetition from 32 months onward; and Exp

    “The following age ranges have been identified: (a) use of communicative gestures between 12 and 30 months [75,79,80,81,86]; (b) communication and receptive lexical skills between 15 and 30 months [75,82,83,86]; (c) expressive lexical skills between 15 and 32 months [75,76,82,83,86,87]; (d) syntactic comprehension from 28 months onward [88]; (f) word combination from 30 months onward [89]; (g) non”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Baron-Cohen S. Allen J. Gillberg C. (1992). Can autism be detected at 18 months? The needle, the haystack, and the CHAT. Br. J. Psychiatry 161 839– 843. 10.1192/bjp.161.6.839 1483172 · DOI
  2. Bates E. (1976). Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  3. Blackwell A. K. M. Harding S. Babayiğit S. Roulstone S. (2015). Characteristics of parent-child interactions: a systematic review of studies comparing children with primary language impairment and their typically developing peers. Commun. Disord. Q. 36 67– 78. 10.1177/1525740114540202 · DOI
  4. Hayes A. F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: Methodology in the Social Sciences, 2nd Edn New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  5. Kendon A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Lausberg H. Sloetjes H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES–ELAN system. Behav. Res. Methods 41 841– 849. 10.3758/BRM.41.3.591 19587200 · DOI
  7. Liszkowski U. (2008). Before L1: a differentiated perspective on infant gestures. Gesture 8 180– 196. 10.1075/gest.8.2.04lis · DOI
  8. Maisch G. Wisch F. H., (1994-2001). Gebärden-Lexikon. Hamburg: Verlag Hörgeschädigte Kinder. 10.1111/1460-6984.12115 · DOI
  9. McNeill D. (1992). Hand and Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Murillo E. Belinchón M. (2012). Gestural-vocal coordination: longitudinal changes and predictive value on early lexical development. Gesture 12 16– 39. 10.1075/gest.12.1.02mur · DOI
  11. Petermann F. Stein I. A. Macha T. (2008). ET 6-6. Entwicklungstest sechs Monate bis sechs Jahre. Frankfurt am Main: Pearson.
  12. Rescorla L. Roberts J. Dahlsgaard K. (1997). Late talkers at 2: outcome at age 3. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40 556– 566. 10.1044/jslhr.4003.556 9210114 · DOI
  13. Szagun G. Stumper B. Schramm S. A. (2009). FRAKIS. Fragebogen zur frühkindlichen Sprachentwicklung. Frankfurt am Main: Pearson.
  14. Volterra V. Capirci O. Caselli M. C. Rinaldi P. Sparaci L. (2017). The gesture–sign interface in language acquisition / L’interface geste–signe dans l’acquisition du langage. LIA 8 13– 41. 10.1075/lia.8.1.02vol · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lüke, C., Ritterfeld, U., Grimminger, A., Rohlfing, K. J., & Liszkowski, U.
Affiliations
  • TU Dortmund University (DE)
  • Paderborn University (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Lüke, Carina
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-02-04
Volume
11
Pages
118-118
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005024125
Cited by
48
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RI 898/6-1, RI 898/6-2, LU 2116/1-2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
gesture, language acquisition, pointing gestures, iconic gestures, language delay, specific language impairment, grammatical development, gesture-speech integration, typically developing children, German-speaking children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review